Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph:
The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Claims 1-32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention.
Claims 1 recites the limitation "a microfluidic rotary mixer" in line 4. Claims 1 recites the limitation "a microfluidic rotary mixer" in line 5. Applicant should claim a first microfluidic rotary mixer and a second rotary mixer or distinguish between the two microfluidic rotary mixers, or if they are the same, provide “the microfluidic rotary mixer” for antecedent basis. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim.
Claims 2-17 are rejected as being dependent upon claim 1.
Claim 19 recites, “a device comprising the microfluidic chip” in line 2. Claim 19 refers to claim to by “a method of making the microfluidic chip of claim 1 or a device comprising the microfluidic chip. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim because “the microfluidic chip” is not referred to as “a device comprising the microfluidic chip of claim 1”.
Claim 20 recites, “a device comprising the microfluidic chip” in line 2. Claim 20 refers to claim to by “a method of measuring analyte concentration in a sample comprising applying the sample and an analyte capture element o the flow layer of the microfluidic chip of claim 1, or a device comprising the microfluidic chip. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim because “the microfluidic chip” is not referred to as “a device comprising the microfluidic chip of claim 1”.
Claims 21-32 are rejected as being dependent upon claim 20.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows:
1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness.
Claims 1-32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ichiki et al. (US 20170370922) in view of Stern et al. (US 2015/0258544).
Regarding claim 1, Ichiki discloses a microfluidic chip comprising one or more electrochemical biosensors (fig. 6), each biosensor comprising:
a) a flow layer (201) comprising an analyte capture zone (40 or 42; para 140-142) comprising a microfluidic rotary mixer (first circular flow path 10 which includes analyte capture zone 40; a second analyte capture zone 42 resides in a second circulation flow path 50); and
a detection zone (60 in the second circulation flow path 50) comprising a microfluidic rotary mixer (circular flow path 50) with a sensing region (60) comprising a working electrode (para 110); wherein the analyte capture zone is fluidically connected with the detection zone by a microfluidic channel (see fig. 6, valve V9 channel or O3, O4, or O4 structures having microfluidic channels that connect the first rotary mixer to the second rotary mixer); and
one or more valves positioned at the flow flayer and intersecting the analyte capture zone and the detection zone (see fig. 6, showing a plurality of valves to control the flow between the two separate rotary mixers
wherein the rotary mixers are looped microfluidic channels intersected with at least one, at least two, or at least three valves (see fig. 6 which shows a first rotary mixer 10 and a second rotary mixer 50 which are intersected with at least one valve (V9, O4,O2, O3,).
Ichiki does not provide a control layer having the valves located above or below the flow layer.
Stern teaches a microfluidic device have a flow layer 600 having the microfluidic channels therein and a control layer (actuation layer 620) located below the flow layer that has valves which actuated to control fluid flow within the flow layer (para 83-88). A membrane (610) separates the flow layer from the control layer (para 83-88). It would have been obvious to one having an ordinary skill in the art to modify Ichiki to employ a control layer separate from the flow layer in order to control movement within a microfluidic device without the need of actual valves within the flow path of the microfluidic channels as is taught by Stern (para 83-88) in order to reduce the potential clogging of mechanical valves within a channel which reduces flow volume over time.
Regarding claim 2, the microfluidic chip of claim 1, wherein the one or more valves of the control layer comprise a flexible membrane at intersections with the analyte capture zone, the detection zone, or both (flexible membrane 610 as seen in fig. 6 of Stern is provided to separate the flow channel from the control layer).
Regarding claim 3, the microfluidic chip of claim 1, wherein the one or more valves of the control layer form a rotary pump (para 75) comprising at least three valves configured for sequential operability and intersecting the analyte capture zone and/or the detection zone (See fig. 6 of Ichiki, para 75).
Regarding claim 4, the microfluidic chip of claim 3, wherein the rotary pump is a peristaltic pump (para 75, describes a pump having 3 valves which open and close in order to move a fluid around rotary mixer; fig. 6).
Regarding claim 5, the microfluidic chip of claim 1, comprising an inlet zone (10a, fig. 6) comprising one or more microfluidic channels fluidically connected to the analyte capture zone (rotary mixer 10 has multiple channels arranged around a rectangle path 10).
Regarding claim 6, the microfluidic chip of claim 1, comprising a collection zone (waste reservoir 70) comprising one or more microfluidic channels fluidically connected to the detection zone (60).
Regarding claim 7, the microfluidic chip of claim 1, wherein the control layer comprises one or more microfluidic valves (I1,V1, V2, V3, V4, V5) intersecting any one of microfluidic channels fluidically connecting the inlet zone (10a) to the analyte capture zone (40), the analyte capture zone (40) to the detection zone (60), and the detection zone to the collection zone (70)(valves are provided at each intersection and has control over all the flow paths within the device).
Regarding claim 8, the microfluidic chip of claim 1, wherein the control layer is below the flow layer and the valves are pushed up into the flow layer (see fig. 6 of Stern).
Regarding claim 9, the microfluidic chip of claim 1, wherein the flow layer comprises microfluidic channels having a substantially circular cross-section (see fig. 6).
Regarding claim 10, the microfluidic chip of claim 1, wherein the flow layer comprises microfluidic channels having a substantially angular cross-section such as a square, a rectangular, or a triangular cross section, wherein height to width ratio of the microfluidic channels is between about 1:2 and about 1:15 (para 71-74).
Regarding claim 11, the microfluidic chip of claim 1, wherein the flow layer comprises microfluidic channels having a diameter or a height between about 10 um (.01 mm para 67) and 1000 um, and length between about 5 and 100 mm (para 67,177; fig. 6).
Regarding claim 12, the microfluidic chip of claim 1, wherein the microfluidic rotary mixer comprises a looped microfluidic channel having a geometry selected from the group consisting of a square, a rectangular (fig. 6), and a triangular cross-section.
Regarding claim 13, the microfluidic chip of claim 1, wherein the detection zone comprises a trap region comprising a magnet (carrier particles comprises magnetic beads, para. 80), a gel, or a capture substance (carrier particles, magnetic, gold agarose, plastic beads; para 80).
Regarding claim 14, the microfluidic chip of claim 1, wherein the sensing region is coated with a capture moiety (gold moiety, antibody, antigen, para .112).
Regarding claim 15, the microfluidic chip of claim 1, comprising between two and ten electrochemical biosensors (Stern provides multiple electrochemical biosensors, para 152).
Regarding claim 16, a device comprising the microfluidic chip of claim 1 (this limitation does not further structurally limit the instant claim).
Regarding claim 17, the device of claim 16, comprising a microfluidic controlling module (control part, para 220) and a display means (Stern, para 171).
Regarding claim 18, the device of claim 17, wherein the microfluidic controlling module comprises a solenoid valve array (Stern, para 119).
Regarding claim 19, Ichiki teaches a method of making the microfluidic chip of claim 1 or a device comprising the microfluidic chip comprising:
forming the flow layer and/or the control layer using one or more methods selected from the group consisting of stereolithography, soft lithography, laser machining, micromachining, curing, bonding, three-dimensional printing, molding, micromolding, thermal setting, metal deposition, and coating (Stern teaches soft lithography; para 30). It would have been obvious to one having an ordinary sklii in the art at the time of the invention to modify Ichiki to employ soft lithography techniques to make the microfluidic device as these process of making microfluidics are well known as taught by Stern (para 30, 72).
Regarding claim 20, a method of measuring analyte concentration in a sample comprising applying the sample and an analyte capture element to the flow layer of the microfluidic chip of claim 1 or to a device comprising the microfluidic chip. The modified Ichiki provides a device of claim 1 and the teaching of analyte capture element to the flow layer of the microfluidic chip (para 81).
Regarding claim 21, the method of claim 20, comprising mixing the sample and the analyte capture element in the microfluidic rotary mixer of the analyte capture zone to obtain captured analyte (para 78-81).
Regarding claim 22, the method of claim 20, comprising trapping the captured analyte in a trap region of the detection zone (detection zone 60 analyzes the captured analyte at the detection zone having a “trap region” which is being interpreted as any area within the detection zone where the captured analyte resides for detection.
Regarding claim 23, the method of claim 22, comprising trapping the captured analyte in a trap region of the detection zone and washing with buffer. The carrier particle is, as an example, a particle capable of reacting with a sample substance to be detected. The sample substance is, for example, a biomolecule such as a nucleic acid, a DNA, a RNA, a peptide, a protein, and an extracellular vesicle but does not teach a buffer. In para 163-167, teaches the use of a buffer (transport liquid).
Regarding claim 24, the method of claim 21, comprising flowing the captured analyte over the sensing region to contact the one or more electrodes of the sensing region (flowing the captured analyte over the sensing region to contact the electrodes, para 84, 110).
Regarding claim 25, the method of claim 20, comprising adding a substrate reagent and recording a change in current from the sensing region (para 164-168, second reagent).
Regarding claim 26, the method of claim 20, wherein any one of mixing, trapping, washing, and flowing is accomplished using one or more peristaltic pumps (see claim 4 above).
Regarding claim 27, the method of claim 20, comprising detecting a concentration of the analyte in the sample based on a change in current from the sensing region (para 107-117).
Regarding claim 28. (currently amended) The method of claim 20, wherein the microfluidic chip operates with sample volumes between about 0.5 uL and 500 uL (see Stern para 147).
Regarding claim 29, the method of claim20, wherein the microfluidic chip operates at flow rates between about 0.5 uL/min and 15 uL/min (para 82-84).
Regarding claim 30, the method of claim 20, wherein the valves in the microfluidic chip operate at pressures between about 5 psi and 50 psi (Stern para 82, 119).
Regarding claim 31, the method of claim 20, wherein the microfluidic chip operates at valve closure between about 50% and 95% (para 99-102, the act of closing a valve and opening even from 0-100 encompasses the range taught above while a flow is still moving through the valve).
Regarding claim 32, the method of claim 20, wherein the microfluidic chip comprises between two and ten electrochemical biosensors and is configured to measure the concentration of the same analyte with the biosensors, or the concentrations two to ten different analytes with biosensors (Stern provides multiple electrochemical biosensors, para 152).
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMUEL P SIEFKE whose telephone number is (571)272-1262. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8-5.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Maris Kessel can be reached at 571-270-7698. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/SAMUEL P SIEFKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1758