Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/007,169

HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE AND CONTROL PANEL ASSEMBLY AND TOUCH MODULE THEREOF

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jan 27, 2023
Priority
Jul 27, 2020 — CN 202010730851.7 +1 more
Examiner
THAKER, NIDHI VIVEK
Art Unit
2841
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Bsh Hausgeräte GmbH
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
499 granted / 725 resolved
+0.8% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
739
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
81.5%
+41.5% vs TC avg
§102
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 725 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 37 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 37 discloses “said abutting portion includes an elastic abutting column, or an elastic sheet (Fig. 12), or a spring (Fig. 12),” which should read as “said abutting portion includes an elastic abutting column, or an elastic sheet, or a spring.” Appropriate correction is required. For the purpose of examination, “said abutting portion includes an elastic abutting column, or an elastic sheet (Fig. 12), or a spring (Fig. 12)” is treated as “said abutting portion includes an elastic abutting column, or an elastic sheet, or a spring.” Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 24-29 and 39-45 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Graff et al. (EP 3145082 A1). Re claim 24: Graff discloses a control panel assembly (control housing 11 in fig 1) of a household appliance (see electrical appliance in abstract), the control panel assembly comprising: a touch panel (12 in fig 1); and a touch module abutting against said touch panel, said touch module including a structural support frame (carrier film 20 + plastic 39 + component carrier 30 in figs 1-3) and a touch sensor group (capacitive sensor elements 22 in fig 1; herein, 22 are touch sensors which collectively make up a touch sensor group); said touch sensor group including at least one touch sensor (22), said at least one touch sensor having one side (i.e., bottom side) adhered to said structural support frame (carrier film 20 in fig 1) and another side (i.e., top side) attached to said touch panel (12 in figs 2-3). Re claim 25: Graff discloses the control panel assembly, wherein said structural support frame (21) is formed of a flexible material. Re claim 26: Graff discloses the control panel assembly, wherein said structural support frame includes a support portion (39 in fig 3) and an elastic portion (20 in fig 3), said elastic portion being fixed to said support portion (see fig 3), and said at least one touch sensor (22) being adhered to said elastic portion (20). Re claim 27: Graff discloses the control panel assembly, wherein said elastic portion (20 in fig 3) is detachably connected to said support portion (39 in fig 3). Re claim 28: Graff discloses the control panel assembly, wherein said touch module includes an electronic board (component carrier 30 in figs 1, 3) for providing a light source (LED 35 in fig 1), said electronic board being fixed to said structural support frame (20 +39 in fig 3), and said structural support frame being located between said at least one touch sensor (22) and said electronic board (30). Re claim 29: Graff discloses the control panel assembly, wherein said touch module includes a first touch module (carrier film 20 + plastic 39 + component carrier 30 in fig 3), said first touch module includes a first touch sensor (capacitive sensor elements 22 in fig 1) and a first structural support frame (20 + 39), and said first touch module is configured to (i.e., functional language) control procedure selection (i.e., via microcontroller arranged on the component carrier 30). Re claim 39: Graff discloses a household appliance (herein, electrical appliance may be a hob with a translucent hob plate), comprising the control panel assembly according to claim 24 (see abstract). Re claim 40: Graff discloses a touch module (capacitive sensor elements 22 + carrier film 20 + plastic 39 + component carrier 30 in fig 3) of a household appliance (see electrical appliance in abstract), the touch module comprising: a touch sensor group (capacitive sensor elements 22 in fig 1; herein, 22 are touch sensors which collectively make up a touch sensor group) and a structural support frame (carrier film 20 + plastic 39 + component carrier 30 in figs 1, 3); said touch sensor group including at least one touch sensor (22); and said at least one touch sensor having one side (i.e., bottom side) adhered to said structural support frame (carrier film 20 in fig 1). Re claim 41: Graff discloses the touch module, wherein said structural support frame (21) is formed of a flexible material. Re claim 42: Graff discloses the touch module, wherein said structural support frame includes a support portion (39) and an elastic portion (20), said elastic portion being fixed to said support portion (see fig 3), and said at least one touch sensor (22) being adhered to said elastic portion (see fig 1). Re claim 43: Graff discloses the touch module, wherein said elastic portion is detachably connected to said support portion (see fig 3). Re claim 44: Graff discloses the touch module, comprising an electronic board (component carrier 30 in figs 1, 3) for providing a light source (LED 35 in fig 1), said electronic board being fixed to said structural support frame (20 +39 in fig 3), and said structural support frame being located between said at least one touch sensor (22) and said electronic board (30). Re claim 45: Graff discloses the touch module, wherein said touch module includes a first touch module (carrier film 20 + plastic 39 + component carrier 30 in fig 1), said first touch module includes a first touch sensor (capacitive sensor elements 22 in fig 1) and a first structural support frame (20 + 39), and said first touch module is configured to (i.e., functional language) control procedure selection (i.e., via microcontroller arranged on the component carrier 30). Claim(s) 24, 31-34 and 39 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kim (EP 3256787 B1). Re claim 24: Kim discloses a control panel assembly (40 in figs 1-2) of a household appliance (cooking apparatus 1 in fig 1), the control panel assembly comprising: a touch panel (cover 110 + touch booster 530 in figs 32-33); and a touch module (700 + 750 in fig 25) abutting against said touch panel (530), said touch module including a structural support frame (700) and a touch sensor group (750); said touch sensor group including at least one touch sensor (750), said at least one touch sensor having one side adhered to said structural support frame (700) and another side attached to said touch panel (530). Re claim 31: Kim discloses the control panel assembly, which further comprises a positioning identifier (copper piece 712 + sensor hole 713 in fig 25) located on said structural support frame (700), said positioning identifier configured to (i.e., functional language) locate an adhesion position of said at least one touch sensor (750). Re claim 32: Kim discloses the control panel assembly, which further comprises a printed pattern (indication part 163 in figs 21, 31; herein, the indication part 163 indicates the area of the touching parts 161 by printing or laser processing, and allows the user to touch an exact position corresponding to the touch sensor 750): said printed pattern located on a side of said touch panel (110 in fig 31) facing said at least one touch sensor (750). Re claim 33: Kim discloses the control panel assembly, which further comprises a housing (510 + 520 in figs 22-23) having a receiving cavity, said touch module (700 + 720 + 750) being located in said receiving cavity, and said touch panel (110 +530) being connected to said housing. Re claim 34: Kim discloses the control panel assembly, wherein: said housing includes a front housing (510 in fig 22) and a rear housing (520 in fig 22); said front housing has a mounting opening (512 in fig 22); said touch panel (530) abuts against said touch module through said mounting opening; said rear housing (520) is detachably connected to said front housing; and said rear housing abuts against said touch module (i.e., abuts against elastic member 720 on 700) to apply pressure to said touch module, causing said at least one touch sensor to abut against said touch panel. Re claim 39: Kim discloses a household appliance (cooking apparatus 1 in fig 1), comprising the control panel assembly (40 in figs 1-2) according to claim 24. Claim(s) 24, 29, 40 and 45 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Chu et al. (US 20210131720 A1). Re claim 24: Chu discloses a control panel assembly (see fig 7) of a household appliance (refrigerator 1 in fig 1), the control panel assembly comprising: a touch panel (touch cover 73 in fig 7 and paragraph 153); and a touch module abutting against said touch panel, said touch module including a structural support frame (touch PCB 71 in fig 7 and paragraph 137) and a touch sensor group (touch sensors 712 in fig 7 and paragraph 232); said touch sensor group including at least one touch sensor (712), said at least one touch sensor having one side adhered to said structural support frame (71) and another side attached to said touch panel (73). Re claim 29: Chu discloses the control panel assembly, wherein said touch module includes a first touch module (touch PCB 71 + touch sensors 712 in fig 7), said first touch module includes a first touch sensor (712) and a first structural support frame (71), and said first touch module is configured to (i.e., functional language) control procedure selection. Re claim 40: Chu discloses a touch module of a household appliance (refrigerator 1 in fig 1), the touch module comprising: a touch sensor group (touch sensors 712 in fig 7 and paragraph 232) and a structural support frame (touch PCB 71 in fig 7 and paragraph 137); said touch sensor group including at least one touch sensor (712); and said at least one touch sensor having one side adhered to said structural support frame (71). Re claim 45: Chu discloses the touch module, comprising a first touch module (touch PCB 71 + touch sensors 712 in fig 7), said first touch module includes a first touch sensor (712) and a first structural support frame (71), and said first touch module is configured to (i.e., functional language) control procedure selection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 35-38 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (EP 3256787 B1). Re claim 35: Kim discloses the control panel assembly, wherein said rear housing has a side (524 in fig 22) facing said front housing. Kim fails to disclose said side having an abutting portion, and said abutting portion abutting against said touch module. However, an abutting portion (elastic member 720 in figs 22-23) is provided on a rear side of the touch module (700) for abutting against said side of the rear housing (524) such that said side of the rear housing pushes the abutting portion, to move the touch module forward toward the touch panel, when the front housing and the rear housing are fastened. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the abutting portion on said side of the rear housing instead of providing it on the touch module such that the abutting portion on the rear housing abuts against the touch module as per the designer’s choice. Also, rearrangement of parts is considered obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art and has a little patentable significance unless a new and an unexpected result is produced. Re claim 36: Kim discloses the control panel assembly, wherein said abutting portion (elastic member 720 in figs 22-23) is elastic. Re claim 37: Kim discloses the control panel assembly, wherein said abutting portion (elastic member 720 in figs 22-23) includes an elastic abutting column. Re claim 38: Kim discloses the control panel assembly, wherein said mounting opening (512) defines an inner edge; and said structural support frame (700) has an outer edge. Kim fails to disclose that one of said inner edge or said outer edge is provided with an inlay bayonet; and another of said inner edge or said outer edge is provided with an inlay protrusion adapted to said inlay bayonet. However, embodiment of figs 3-8 of Kim discloses a module (310 in figs 7-8) attached to a frame (200 in figs 7-8), wherein an inner edge of the frame is provided with an inlay bayonet (aligning groove 221 in fig 8); and an outer edge of the module is provided with an inlay protrusion (aligning protrusion 322 in fig 8) adapted to said inlay bayonet. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inner edge of the mounting opening with an inlay bayonet and provide the outer edge of the structural support frame with an inlay protrusion in order to properly position the structural support frame in the housing. Claim(s) 30 and 46 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chu et al. (US 20210131720 A1). Re claim 30: Chu discloses the control panel assembly, wherein said touch module includes a second structural support frame (display PCB 50 in figs 7, 10-11 and paragraph 135, 167-169) connected to said first touch module (i.e., via connector 541 in fig 11), and a display portion (display part 211 in fig 3 and paragraph 107), said display portion is configured to (i.e., functional language) display setting content. Chu fails to disclose a second touch sensor coupled to the second structural support frame and the display portion. However, embodiment of figs 27-28 of Chu discloses a touch display device (80 in paragraph 259-260) comprising a touch module (touch assembly 1100 in paragraph 267), wherein said touch module includes a touch sensor, the second structural support frame (sensor PCB in paragraph 267) and the display portion (frame assembly 1300 in figs 28, 30 and paragraphs 285-286). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the display portion of Chu with a second touch sensor in order to provide more intuitive user experience and promoting increased productivity. Re claim 46: Chu discloses the touch module, wherein said touch module further includes a second structural support frame (display PCB 50 in figs 7, 10-11 and paragraph 135, 167-169) connected to said first touch module (i.e., via connector 541 in fig 11), and a display portion (display part 211 in fig 3 and paragraph 107), said display portion is configured to (i.e., functional language) display setting content. Chu fails to disclose a second touch sensor coupled to the second structural support frame and the display portion. However, embodiment of figs 27-28 of Chu discloses a touch display device (80 in paragraph 259-260) comprising a touch module (touch assembly 1100 in paragraph 267), wherein said touch module includes a touch sensor, the second structural support frame (sensor PCB in paragraph 267) and the display portion (frame assembly 1300 in figs 28, 30 and paragraphs 285-286). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the display portion of Chu with a second touch sensor in order to provide more intuitive user experience and promoting increased productivity. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Nidhi Thaker whose telephone number is (571)270-3408. The examiner can normally be reached M, TH, F 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Imani Hayman can be reached at 571-270-5528. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NIDHI THAKER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 27, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Feb 23, 2026
Response Filed
May 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638880
Drive Mechanisms for Activating Emergency Features
2y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12632086
Adapter for a Handle Attachment for a Mobile Computing Device
2y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12608042
DOCKING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DOCKING A HANDHELD DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12608043
Modular Dock for Mobile Computing Devices
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12608054
LAPTOP COMPUTER
2y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+19.6%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 725 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month