Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/007,722

ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION FOR LITHIUM-SULFUR SECONDARY BATTERY, AND LITHIUM-SULFUR SECONDARY BATTERY COMPRISING SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 01, 2022
Priority
Apr 19, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0050433 +1 more
Examiner
SHEIKH, HAROON S
Art Unit
1751
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
320 granted / 454 resolved
+5.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
485
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
86.1%
+46.1% vs TC avg
§102
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§112
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 454 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 3/30/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment This is a non-final office action in response to Applicant's remarks and amendments filed on 3/30/2026. Claims 1 and 5 are currently amended. Claims 2-4 and 7 are cancelled. Claims 1, 5-6 and 8-13 are pending review in this action. The 35 U.S.C. 103 rejections in the previous Office Action are withdrawn. New grounds of rejection necessitated by Applicant's amendments are presented below. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 3/30/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Lee fails to teach or suggest the organic-substituted cyclic anhydrides represented by Chemical formulas 1 and 2, or that represented by Chemical Formula 3. However, the current rejection modifies Lee’s teaching of the cyclic anhydrides with well-known alternatives or species thereof by new references Burkhardt and Kim, where the cyclic anhydrides are known alternatives or species for forming a film on the anode surface in order to improve capacity retention characteristics or cycle characteristics of a lithium battery after high-temperature storage. For further details, please review the rejections below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1, 5-6 and 8-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (KR2020016045A; refer to IDS filed 12/1/2022; machine translation on record) in view of Burkhardt (US20140302401A1) and Kim (US20100183926A1; refer to IDS filed 12/1/2022), and alternatively, further in view of Park (US20180248227A1; refer to IDS filed 12/1/2022). Regarding Claim 1, Lee discloses an electrolyte solution for a lithium-sulfur secondary battery [pars. 0001-2,0008], comprising: a lithium salt [pars. 0008,0029]; a non-aqueous solvent [pars. 0012-18,0026-27]; and a cyclic anhydride compound (characteristic improving agents including carboxylic acid anhydrides such as succinic anhydride, maleic anhydride, etc.) [pars. 0036,0041-42]. Lee fails to explicitly disclose wherein the cyclic anhydride compound is represented by any one of Chemical Formula 1 to Chemical Formula 3. That is, while Lee discloses unsubstituted configurations of anhydrides represented by Chemical Formulas 1 and 2 (carboxylic acid anhydrides such as succinic anhydride, maleic anhydride, etc.) for improving capacity retention or cycle characteristics after high-temperature storage [par. 0041], Lee fails to disclose organic R-substituted configurations, as claimed. However, Burkhardt, from the same field of endeavor, teaches electrolyte compositions for lithium secondary batteries comprising cyclic carboxylic acid anhydrides as film-forming chemical compounds which form a film on the anode in order to prevent side reactions between the anode and the electrolyte, thus improving cycling performance at high temperature [Burkhardt – Abstract; pars. 0005,0016-23,0056,0059]. In particular, Burkhardt teaches that suitable cyclic carboxylic acid anhydrides may be represented by Formula II, Formula I, or Formula IV, where R9-R12 may include H or C1 to C10 linear or branched alkyls [Burkhardt –par. 0059], which belong to the same functional family of Lee’s characteristic improving agents, and which read on, respectively, Chemical Formula 1, Chemical Formula 2, and Chemical Formula 3, as claimed. Particular examples of these cyclic carboxylic acid anhydrides include succinic anhydride, maleic anhydride, 2,3-dimethylmaleic anhydride, 1-cyclopentene-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride, 2,3-diphenylmaleic anhydride, and 3,4,5,6-Tetrahydrophthalic anhydride [Burkhardt – par. 0059]. Similarly, Kim, from the same field of endeavor, discloses an electrolyte compositions for lithium secondary batteries comprising anhydride components a film-forming compounds which form a film on the surface of the anode in order to improve storage characteristics at high temperature and prevent movement of lithium ions at low temperature [Kim – Abstract; pars. 0053,0055-57,0067-68]. Kim particularly teaches that the anhydride component may be represented by Formula (2) or Formula (3), wherein R10-R15 may each independently be hydrogen or C1 to C10 alkyl, including succinic anhydride, dimethyl succinic anhydride, [Kim – 0055-57], which belong to the same functional family of Lee’s characteristic improving agents, and which read on, respectively, Chemical Formula 1 and Chemical Formula 2, as claimed. Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious for an ordinary skilled artisan to have modified the characteristic improving agents including carboxylic acid anhydrides of Lee to have comprised the alternative anhydrides of Burkhardt and/or Kim according to the claimed Chemical Formulas 1-3 as well-known substitutes for or species of succinic anhydride and maleic anhydrides for the purpose of improving capacity retention or cycle characteristics after high-temperature storage with a predictable expectation of success [MPEP § 2143]. Lee further discloses wherein the non-aqueous solvent comprises a linear ether (e.g, dimethoxymethane) and a cyclic ether (e.g., such as dimethyl isosorbide, or dioxolane) [Lee – pars. 0012-16,0027-28,0058,0066]. Alternatively, Park, from the same field of endeavor, teaches an electrolyte composition for lithium sulfur batteries comprising a non-aqueous solvent system including a linear ether and a cyclic ether at a volumetric ratio of 5:95 to 95:5 in order to target effects of suppressing gas generation during battery operation, and thus, reduce a swelling phenomenon of battery, resulting in excellent stability during battery operation [Park – pars. 0022,0031,0036]. Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious for an ordinary skilled artisan to have modified the non-aqueous solvent of Lee to have particularly included a co-solvent system comprising a linear ether and a cyclic ether at a volumetric ratio of 5:95 to 95:5 in order to target effects of suppressing gas generation during battery operation, and thus, reduce a swelling phenomenon of battery, resulting in excellent stability during battery operation, without undue experimentation and with a reasonable expectation of success. Regarding Claim 5, Lee, as modified by Burkhardt, teaches wherein the cyclic anhydride compound includes 2,3-dimethylmaleic anhydride, which reads on the claimed Chemical Formula 1-3 [Burkhardt – par. 0059]. Regarding Claim 6, Lee discloses wherein the lithium salt is at least one selected from the group consisting of LiCl, LiBr, LiI, LiClO4, LiBF4, LiB10Cl10, LiB(Ph)4, LiC4BO8, LiPF6, LiCF3SO3, LiCF3CO2, LiAsF6, LiSbF6, LiAlCl4, LiSO3CH3, LiSO3CF3, LiSCN, LiC(CF3SO2)3, LiN(CF3SO2)2, LiN(C2F5SO2)2, LiN(SO2F)2 and lithium lower aliphatic carboxylate [Lee – par. 0029]. Regarding Claim 8, modified Lee discloses wherein the linear ether is selected from the group consisting of dimethyl ether, diethyl ether, dipropyl ether, dibutyl ether, diisobutyl ether, ethylmethyl ether, ethylpropyl ether, ethyl tert-butyl ether, dimethoxymethane, trimethoxymethane, dimethoxyethane, diethoxyethane, dimethoxypropane, diethylene glycol dimethyl ether, diethylene glycol diethyl ether, triethylene glycol dimethyl ether, tetra-ethylene glycol dimethyl ether, ethylene glycol divinylether, diethylene glycol divinylether, triethylene glycol divinylether, dipropylene glycol dimethyl ether, butylene glycol ether, diethylene glycol ethylmethyl ether, diethylene glycol isopropylmethyl ether, diethylene glycol butylmethyl ether, diethylene glycol tert-butylethyl ether, and ethylene glycol ethylmethyl ether [Lee - pars. 0027,0058,0066; Park – 0029,0031,0035]. Regarding Claim 9, modified Lee discloses wherein the cyclic ether is selected from the group consisting of dioxolane, methyldioxolane, dimethyldioxolane, vinyldioxolane, methoxydioxolane, ethylmethyldioxolane, oxane, dioxane, trioxane, tetrahydrofuran, methyl tetrahydrofuran, dimethyl tetrahydrofuran, dimethoxy tetrahydrofuran, ethoxy tetrahydrofuran, dihydropyran, tetrahydropyran, furan and 2-methylfuran [Lee – pars. 0027,0066; Park – par. 0034]. Regarding Claim 10, modified Lee discloses wherein the content of the cyclic anhydride compound is 0.01 to 5 weight% relative to the total weight of the electrolyte solution [Lee – par. 0041-42], which overlaps the claimed range, establishing a prima facie case of obviousness [MPEP 2144.05(I)]. Regarding Claim 11, Lee discloses the electrolyte solution further comprising a nitric acid-based compound [par. 0032]. Regarding Claim 12, Lee discloses wherein the nitric acid-based compound is at least one selected from the group consisting of lithium nitrate, potassium nitrate, cesium nitrate, barium nitrate, ammonium nitrate, methyl nitrate, dialkyl imidazolium nitrate, guanidine nitrate, imidazolium nitrate, and pyridinium nitrate [par. 0033]. Regarding Claim 13, modified Lee discloses a lithium-sulfur secondary battery, comprising the electrolyte solution of claim 1; a positive electrode; a negative electrode; and a separator [Lee – par. 0043]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HAROON S SHEIKH whose telephone number is (571)270-0302. The examiner can normally be reached 9-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JONATHAN LEONG can be reached at (571) 270-1292. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HAROON S. SHEIKH Primary Examiner Art Unit 1751 /Haroon S. Sheikh/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1751
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 01, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 12, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 30, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12665253
BATTERY ALIGNMENT SYSTEM FOR A CAMERA
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658424
POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY AND METHOD OF PREPARING THE SAME
5y 12m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658450
CURRENT COLLECTOR FOR REDOX FLOW BATTERIES
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12633567
SWELLING TAPE FOR SECONDARY BATTERY AND CYLINDRICAL TYPE SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627011
SYSTEM FOR PROTECTING A DEVICE HAVING VARIABLE INTERNAL RESISTANCE
4y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+18.9%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 454 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month