Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/008,093

ANTI-HBV ANTIBODIES AND METHODS OF USE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 02, 2022
Examiner
ALLEN, MARIANNE P
Art Unit
1647
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Institut Pasteur
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
588 granted / 981 resolved
At TC average
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
56 currently pending
Career history
1037
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
§112
44.2%
+4.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 981 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 2, 6-44, 53-65, 69, and 78-85 have been cancelled. Specification The replacement sequence listing submitted 10/22/2025 has been entered. The new sequence listing adds SEQ ID NOS: 277-433. The substitute specification filed 10/22/2025 has been entered. Drawings The replacement drawings (42 sheets) were received on 10/22/2025. These drawings are acceptable. The new drawings contain appropriate sequence identifiers. Claim Objections Claims 1 and 3 are objected to because of the following informalities: Independent claims 1 and 3 should identify the acronym “S-HBs” as small hepatitis B virus surface antigens. See for example page 1 of the specification. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 74 is objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate of claim 3. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). The antibody of claim 3 does not differ in scope from the antibody of claim 74. Sequence Compliance This application contains sequence disclosures in accordance with the definitions for nucleotide and/or amino acid sequences set forth in 37 CFR 1.821(a)(1) and (a)(2). However, this application fails to comply with the requirements of 37 CFR 1.821 - 1.825. The consensus sequence (i.e. “Sequence logo”) found in Figure 15A (see replacement sheet 32/42 submitted 10/22/2025) below SEQ ID NOS: 255-258, 254, 262, 260, 259, and 261 is a sequence that must be in sequence compliance and be referenced by a sequence identifier. Required response – Applicant must provide: A "Sequence Listing" part of the disclosure, as described above in item 1); as well as An amendment specifically directing entry of the "Sequence Listing" part of the disclosure into the application in accordance with 1.825(b)(2); A statement that the "Sequence Listing" includes no new matter in accordance with 1.825(b)(5); and A statement that indicates support for the amendment in the application, as filed, as required by 37 CFR 1.825(b)(4). If the "Sequence Listing" part of the disclosure is submitted according to item 1) a) or b) above, Applicant must also provide: A substitute specification in compliance with 37 CFR 1.52, 1.121(b)(3) and 1.125 inserting the required incorporation-by-reference paragraph, consisting of: A copy of the previously-submitted specification, with deletions shown with strikethrough or brackets and insertions shown with underlining (marked-up version); A copy of the amended specification without markings (clean version); and A statement that the substitute specification contains no new matter; If the "Sequence Listing" part of the disclosure is submitted according to item 1) b), c), or d) above, Applicant must also provide: A replacement CRF in accordance with 1.825(b)(6); and Statement according to item 2) a) or b) above. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 45, 47, and 50 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 45 is directed to the antibody of claim 3 which is cross-reactive against each of the HBV proteins of SEQ ID NO: 254-262. The claim is confusing and indefinite as the specification does not specifically disclose that the Bcl.187 antibody having the CDRs recited in claim 3 is cross-reactive to each of these sequences. Furthermore, if Bcl.187 does bind to each of these sequences, then this claim would not further limit the subject matter of claim 3 as each antibody encompassed would have this activity. If they do not have this activity, then the specification does not identify those structural features responsible for the activity. Clarification is requested. Claim 47 is directed to the antibody of claim 3 which has a neutralizing IC50 value against HBV genome D of less than or equal to 1 ng/ml, measured in vitro. The claim is confusing and indefinite as the specification does not specifically disclose that the Bcl.187 antibody having the CDRs recited in claim 3 has this IC50 value. Furthermore, if Bcl.187 does have this IC50 value, then this claim would not further limit the subject matter of claim 3 as each antibody encompassed would have this activity. If they do not all have this activity, then the specification does not identify those structural features responsible for the activity. Clarification is requested. Claim 50 is dependent upon claim 3. Claim 50 is confusing and indefinite as claim 3 does not include antibody fragments and claim 50 is directed to antibody fragments. Clarification is requested. Claim 1 and 3 are free of the prior art. The prior art does not disclose or suggest antibodies having the recited CDR sequences. These claims are objected to for informalities as set forth above. Claims 4-5 are free of the prior. The prior art does not disclose or suggest having the recited VH/VL retaining the CDRs of independent claim 3. These claims depend upon an objected claim. Claims 52 and 67-68 are free of the prior art. The prior art does not disclose or suggest having the recited heavy chain and light chain sequences retaining the CDRs of independent claim 3. These claims depend upon an objected claim. Claims 46, 48-49, 51, 66, 70-73, 75-77, and 86-89 depend upon an objected claim. With respect to claims 86 and 89, the specification examples demonstrate decreased circulating HBsAg levels in viremic mice by administering antibody Bcl.187 having the CDRs as recited in instant claim 3. The prior art was aware that HBV (acute and chronic) could be treated by administering antibodies against HBV surface antigens. See at least claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 12,509,504; 12,410,239; 11,390,664; and 10,689,434. The prior art was aware that HBV could be treated by additional therapeutic agents as recited in claims 87-88. See at least claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 12,404,318 and 11,382,969. Claims 86-89 depend upon an objected claim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARIANNE P ALLEN whose telephone number is (571)272-0712. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00-3:30 EST Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joanne Hama can be reached at 571-272-2911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Marianne P Allen/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1647 mpa
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 02, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600787
METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF THYROID EYE DISEASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600767
COMPOUNDS AND METHODS TARGETING EPIREGULIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600756
RECOMBINANT MODIFIED FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTORS AND THERAPEUTIC USES THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594334
ETAR ANTIBODY, AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590158
ANTI-TRKA ANTIBODY OR ANTIGEN-BINDING FRAGMENT THEREOF, PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF, AND APPLICATION THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+18.0%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 981 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month