Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/008,666

PHENOL RESIN, EPOXY RESIN, METHODS FOR PRODUCING THESE, EPOXY RESIN COMPOSITION AND CURED PRODUCT THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 07, 2022
Priority
Jun 11, 2020 — JP 2020-101469 +1 more
Examiner
BROOKS, KREGG T
Art Unit
1764
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Kukdo Chemical Co. Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
58%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
411 granted / 722 resolved
-8.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+1.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
781
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
74.7%
+34.7% vs TC avg
§102
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 722 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 19 March 2026 has been entered. Claims 1-21 as amended are pending. All outstanding objections and rejections made in the previous Office Action, and not repeated below, are hereby withdrawn. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 1-4, 7, and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP H07-2830 B2 (“Sanyo”). A partial machine translation is enclosed. As to claims 1 and 2, Sanyo teaches a highly purified phenolic resin displayed with the general formula PNG media_image1.png 121 387 media_image1.png Greyscale (abstract). Example 1 (translation, p. 4) teaches a reaction of dicyclopentadiene and p-cresol, which is expected to provide a structure of formula 1 with R1 being methyl and i = 1 as required by claims 1 and 2. Sanyo teaches that n ranges from 0 to 15, which substantially overlaps the recited range.. Sanyo differs from the recited structure (1) in that Sanyo does not explicitly state the structure contains at least one R2 being a dicyclopentenyl group of the type of formula (1a) and (1b) recited in claim1. However, Sanyo teaches reacting phenol and dicyclopentadiene in the same temperature (100 degrees C), by dropwise addition of DCPD to phenol in the presence of a Lewis acid catalyst, including in ratios acknowledged in applicant’s specification to provide dicyclopentenyl groups as required (see, example 2, using 0.25 mol DCPD per 1 mole of the phenol). Moreover, the IR spectra of the products, Figs. 1, 5, 7, and 9, each show a peak at approximately 3040 cm-1 acknowledged by applicant to indicate the olefin stretching arising from dicyclopentenyl groups of formulae 1a and 1b (specification, para. 0042). It would therefore be an obvious modification to obtain the resin of Sanyo in the recited length n, and that the conditions would inherently provide dicyclopentenyl groups. As to claim 3, Sanyo teaches reacting dicyclopentadiene with phenol in the presence of Lewis acid at the recited temperature. While Sanyo does not explicitly teach reacting the dicyclopentadiene with the phenolic resin as recited, Sanyo teaches adding the DCPD gradually, and it would be expected that at least some of the resin to which the DCPD is added would have the recited structure. As to claim 4, Sanyo teaches preferably 0.005 to 0.08 moles of Lewis acid catalyst per mole DCPD (translation, p. 3). As to claim 7, Sanyo teaches the phenolic resin as a curing agent for epoxy resin (translation, p. 2). As to claim 13, Sanyo teaches the phenolic resin may be used as a curing agent for an epoxy resin, thus suggesting a cured product of an epoxy resin and the phenolic resin may obtained. Claims 5, 6, 8, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP H07-2830 B2 (“Sanyo”) in view of US 4,764,571 (“Namba”). As to claim 5, As to claim 1, Sanyo teaches a highly purified phenolic resin displayed with the general formula PNG media_image1.png 121 387 media_image1.png Greyscale (abstract). Example 1 (translation, p. 4) teaches a reaction of dicyclopentadiene and p-cresol, which is expected to provide a structure of formula 1 with R1 being methyl and i = 1 as required by claims 1 and 2. Sanyo teaches that n ranges from 0 to 15. Sanyo teaches that the phenolic resin can be used to prepare an epoxy resin (translation, p. 2), but does not teach the recited structure. However, it is known from Namba that an epoxy resin (2:20-30) PNG media_image2.png 109 473 media_image2.png Greyscale can be formed from a corresponding phenol resin formed from phenol and DCPD PNG media_image3.png 102 374 media_image3.png Greyscale (3:15-20) by reaction with epichlorohydrin. As such, the general formula (2) with R1 being methyl, I being 1, and k being from greater than 0 to 10 is an obvious modification suggested by Sanyo in view of Namba. Sanyo in view of Namba differs from the recited structure (2) in that Sanyo does not explicitly state the structure contains at least one R2 being a dicyclopentenyl group of formula 1a or 1b as recited in claim 5. However, Sanyo teaches reacting phenol and dicyclopentadiene in the same temperature (100 degrees C), by dropwise addition of DCPD to phenol in the presence of a Lewis acid catalyst, including in ratios acknowledged in applicant’s specification to provide dicyclopentenyl groups as required (see, example 2, using 0.25 mol DCPD per 1 mole of the phenol).. Moreover, the IR spectra of the products of Sanyo, Figs. 1, 5, 7, and 9, each show a peak at approximately 3040 cm-1 acknowledged by applicant to indicate the olefin stretching arising from the recited dicyclopentenyl groups of formulae 1a and 1b (see specification, para. 0042). It would therefore be an obvious modification to obtain the resin of Sanyo in the recited length n, and that the conditions would provide dicyclopentenyl groups. Furthermore, it is reasonable to expect that converting the phenolic groups to epoxy groups per Namba would result in an epoxy resin of formula (2) with some R2 being dicyclopentenyl. As such, it would be an obvious modification of Sanyo in view of Namba, to provide the recited resin length, along with the dicyclopentenyl groups as Sanyo teaches the same methods to produce the phenolic resin and the same IR peaks indicating dicyclopentenyl groups. As to claim 6, Sanyo does not teach the recited method for obtaining epoxy resin. Namba teaches obtaining the epoxy resin from the phenolic resin by reacting 2 to 10 moles of epichlorohydrin per mole of phenolic hydroxyl groups in the presence of alkali metal hydroxide (col. 3). Sanyo in view of Namba differs from the recited structure (2) in that Sanyo does not explicitly state the structure contains at least one R2 being a dicyclopentenyl group of formula 1a or 1b as recited in claim 5. However, Sanyo teaches reacting phenol and dicyclopentadiene in the same temperature (100 degrees C), by dropwise addition of DCPD to phenol in the presence of a Lewis acid catalyst, including in ratios acknowledged in applicant’s specification to provide dicyclopentenyl groups as required (see, example 2, using 0.25 mol DCPD per 1 mole of the phenol).. Moreover, the IR spectra of the products of Sanyo, Figs. 1, 5, 7, and 9, each show a peak at approximately 3040 cm-1 acknowledged by applicant to indicate the olefin stretching arising from the recited dicyclopentenyl groups of formulae 1a and 1b (see specification, para. 0042). It would therefore be an obvious modification to obtain the resin of Sanyo in the recited length n, and that the conditions would provide dicyclopentenyl groups. Furthermore, it is reasonable to expect that converting the phenolic groups to epoxy groups per Namba would result in an epoxy resin of formula (2) with some R2 being dicyclopentenyl. As such, it would be an obvious modification of Sanyo in view of Namba, to provide the recited resin length, along with the dicyclopentenyl groups as Sanyo teaches the same methods to produce the phenolic resin and the same IR peaks indicating dicyclpentenyl groups. As to claim 8, Sanyo does not teach a composition containing the epoxy resin and curing agent. However, Sanyo teaches the resin may be used for epoxy resins, and Namba teaches the corresponding epoxy resin. Namba teaches the epoxy resin in combination with a curing agent (5:16-25); as such, the use of the epoxy resin of Sanyo in view of Namba in a curable composition is an obvious end use suggested by Namba. As to claim 20, while Sanyo does not explicitly teach a cured product, it teaches the phenolic resin as a curing agent. Namba, furthermore, teaches the corresponding epoxy resin and cured product thereof (col. 5). Thus a cured product is an obvious end use suggested by Sanyo and Namba. Claims 9 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP H07-2830 B2 (“Sanyo”) as applied to claim 1, further in view of US 4,764,571 (“Namba”). As to claim 9, Sanyo teaches that the phenolic resin, which as discussed would be expected to have at least some resin having the recited dicyclopentenyl groups, may be used as a curing agent for epoxy resin and as a base for epoxy resin (translation, p. 2). Sanyo does not discuss a composition simultaneously having the phenolic resin of claim 1 and the epoxy resin of general formula (2)., However, it is known from Namba that an epoxy resin (2:20-30) PNG media_image2.png 109 473 media_image2.png Greyscale can be formed from a corresponding phenol resin formed from phenol and DCPD PNG media_image3.png 102 374 media_image3.png Greyscale (3:15-20) by reaction with epichlorohydrin. As such, the general formula (2) with R1 being methyl, I being 1, and k being from greater than 0 to 10 is an obvious modification suggested by Sanyo in view of Namba. Sanyo in view of Namba differs from the recited structure (2) in that Sanyo does not explicitly state the structure contains at least one R2 being a dicyclopentenyl group of formula 1a or 1b as recited in claim 5. However, Sanyo teaches reacting phenol and dicyclopentadiene in the same temperature (100 degrees C), by dropwise addition of DCPD to phenol in the presence of a Lewis acid catalyst, including in ratios acknowledged in applicant’s specification to provide dicyclopentenyl groups as required (see, example 2, using 0.25 mol DCPD per 1 mole of the phenol).. Moreover, the IR spectra of the products of Sanyo, Figs. 1, 5, 7, and 9, each show a peak at approximately 3040 cm-1 acknowledged by applicant to indicate the olefin stretching arising from the recited dicyclopentenyl groups of formulae 1a and 1b (see specification, para. 0042). It would therefore be an obvious modification to obtain the resin of Sanyo in the recited length n, and that the conditions would provide dicyclopentenyl groups. Furthermore, it is reasonable to expect that converting the phenolic groups to epoxy groups per Namba would result in an epoxy resin of formula (2) with some R2 being dicyclopentenyl. As such, it would be an obvious modification of Sanyo in view of Namba, to provide the recited resin length, along with the dicyclopentenyl groups as Sanyo teaches the same methods to produce the phenolic resin and the same IR peaks indicating dicyclpentenyl groups, and that the epoxidized resin would also have the corresponding structure having dicyclopentenyl groups. As to claim 21, while Sanyo does not explicitly teach a cured product, it teaches the phenolic resin as a curing agent. Namba, furthermore, teaches the corresponding epoxy resin and cured product thereof (col. 5). Thus a cured product is an obvious end use suggested by Sanyo and Namba. Claims 10-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP H07-2830 B2 (“Sanyo”) as applied to claim 7, further in view of JP 2001-240654 A (“Ogura”). As to claim 10, Sanyo teaches that the phenol resin may be used as curing agent for epoxy resin(translation, p. 2), but does not discuss prepreg. However, it is known from Ogura that dicyclopentadiene modified phenol resins may be used to form circuit board (abstract para. 0029), specifically using epoxy resin composition with curing agent in prepreg (para. 0011). AS such, the use of the dicyclopentadiene phenol resin in such an application is known in the art from Ogura. As to claim 11, Sanyo teaches that the phenol resin may be used as curing agent for epoxy resin (translation, p. 2), but does not specifically discuss laminated board. However, it is known from Ogura that dicyclopentadiene modified epoxy resins in conjunction with dicyclopentadiene phenol resins may be used to form circuit board (abstract), specifically using such epoxy resin with curing agent in prepreg (para. 0011), and teaching using the same to form a laminated board (para. 0057). As such, the use of the dicyclopentadiene phenol resin composition in such an application is obvious as taught by Ogura. As to claim 12, Sanyo teaches that the phenol resin may be used as curing agent for epoxy resin (translation, p. 2),, but does not specifically discuss printed wiring substrate. However, it is 0known from Ogura that dicyclopentadiene modified epoxy resins may be used to form circuit board in conjunction with dicyclopentadiene phenol resin curing agent (abstract, para. 0029), specifically using such epoxy resin with curing agent in prepreg (para. 0011), and teaching using the same to form a laminated board (para. 0057) and forming a wiring pattern thereon (para. 0011), which may be printed (para. 0042), thus a printed wiring substrate. As such, the use of the dicyclopentadiene epoxy resin composition in such an application is obvious as taught by Ogura. Claims 14-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP H07-2830 B2 (“Sanyo”) in view of US 4,764,571 (“Namba”) as applied to claims 8 or 9, further in view of JP 2001-240654 A (“Ogura”). As to claims 14 and 15, Sanyo teaches that the phenol resin may be used as curing agent for epoxy resin (translation, p. 2), and Namba teaches that epoxidized dicyclopentadiene phenol can be cured with a curing agent, but does not discuss prepreg. However, it is known from Ogura that dicyclopentadiene phenol based epoxy resins dicyclopentadiene modified phenol resins may be used to form circuit board (abstract para. 0029), specifically using epoxy resin composition with curing agent in prepreg (para. 0011). AS such, the use of the dicyclopentadiene phenol epoxy resin and/or dicyclopentadiene phenol resin in such an application is known in the art from Ogura. As to claims 16 and 17, Sanyo teaches that the phenol resin may be used as curing agent for epoxy resin (translation, p. 2), and Namba teaches that epoxidized dicyclopentadiene phenol can be cured with a curing agent, but does not specifically discuss laminated board. However, it is known from Ogura that dicyclopentadiene modified epoxy resins in conjunction with dicyclopentadiene phenol resins may be used to form circuit board (abstract), specifically using such epoxy resin with curing agent in prepreg (para. 0011), and teaching using the same to form a laminated board (para. 0057). As such, the use of the dicyclopentadiene epoxy resin and/or dicyclopentadiene phenol resin composition in such an application is obvious as taught by Ogura. As to claims 18 and 19, Sanyo teaches that the phenol resin may be used as curing agent for epoxy resin (translation, p. 2), and Namba teaches that epoxidized dicyclopentadiene phenol can be cured with a curing agent,, but does not specifically discuss printed wiring substrate. However, it is 0known from Ogura that dicyclopentadiene modified epoxy resins may be used to form circuit board in conjunction with dicyclopentadiene phenol resin curing agent (abstract, para. 0029), specifically using such epoxy resin with curing agent in prepreg (para. 0011), and teaching using the same to form a laminated board (para. 0057) and forming a wiring pattern thereon (para. 0011), which may be printed (para. 0042), thus a printed wiring substrate. As such, the use of the dicyclopentadiene epoxy resin composition and/or dicyclopentadiene phenol resin in such an application is obvious as taught by Ogura. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 19 March 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Sanyo does not teach the pendant dicyclopentenyl groups as recited in the phenolic resins and epoxy resins, and that because Sanyo does not add the DCPD to the phenol resin in the two step fashion, that the resins of Sanyo cannot meet the recited formulae. This is unpersuasive for two reasons. First, Sanyo teaches the addition of DCPD to the phenol compound in a dropwise fashion. It is reasonable to expect that this technique would result in the addition of DCPD to some formed DCPD-phenol resin, given the gradual nature of the addition. Second, applicant has not addressed the fact that the examples oF Sanyo, being made from the same starting materials, provides a product with a FTIR spectrum showing a peak of 3040 wavenumbers, which applicant states arises from the dicyclopentenyl group of formula 1a and 1b (see Figs. of Sanyo). Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that the addition of dicyclopentadiene to phenol, while resulting generally in the double addition of DCPD to phenol resulting in bridging dicyclopentanediyl groups, that such addition also results in resins showing single addition of DCPD to phenolic groups providing the dicyclpentenyl groups having the same vibration as shown by the FTIR spectrum. Thus, since Sanyo teaches such resins can be epoxy curing agents, and Namba teaches the utility of epoxy resins based on DCPD phenol resins, the remainder of the claims are obvious over Sanyo itself or in combination with Namba and Ogura. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KREGG T BROOKS whose telephone number is (313)446-4888. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 9 am to 5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arrie Reuther can be reached at (571)270-7026. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KREGG T BROOKS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1764
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 07, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 22, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 29, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 19, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12674017
FIBERS, FIBER MULTILAYER STRUCTURE, SPINNING SOLUTION FOR ELECTROSPINNING, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING FIBERS
4y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674011
MODIFIED POLYETHYLENE RESINS AND PROCESS FOR MAKING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12661428
PREPARATION METHOD FOR NON-SPHERICAL HYDROGEL MICROPARTICLE EMBOLIC AGENT
4y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655298
IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO SUPERHYDROPHOBIC SURFACES
4y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12630679
PREPREG
3y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
58%
With Interview (+1.3%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 722 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month