Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/008,950

MULTIPLE WUS INDICATION WITH MULTIPLE DRX GROUPS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 07, 2022
Priority
Jul 09, 2020 — GR 20200100401 +1 more
Examiner
TORRES, MARCOS L
Art Unit
2647
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
471 granted / 701 resolved
+5.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
751
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
87.6%
+47.6% vs TC avg
§102
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 701 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 2-26-2026 have been fully considered but they are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over He 20200045768 in view of Chang 20220095226. As to claim 1, He discloses an apparatus for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE) [104,350,802], comprising: a memory [360]; and at least one processor [356,359,368] coupled to the memory (see fig. 3; par. 0053) and configured to: receive a plurality of discontinuous reception (DRX) configurations [810,1208] for a plurality of DRX groups, wherein the plurality of DRX configurations is indicative of multiple wake-up signals (WUSs) corresponding to the plurality of DRX groups, and wherein each WUS of the multiple WUSs corresponds to a particular DRX group of the plurality of DRX groups (see fig. 8; par. 0072-0073, 0081, 0103); monitor for, based on the plurality of DRX configurations, one or more, WUSs of the multiple WUSs corresponding to the plurality of DRX groups, wherein each WUS of the multiple WUSs includes multiple WUS indicators, and include multiple WUS indicators and wherein the multiple WUS indicators comprise: a respective WUS indicator corresponding to the particular DRX group, and one or more WUS indicators each corresponding to a respective DRX group of other DRX groups of the plurality of DRX groups [614, 714, 822] (see par. 0077,0084-0085); and in response to non-receipt of a first WUS of the multiple WUSs corresponding to a first DRX group of the plurality of DRX groups, determine whether to wake-up for or to sleep through one or more DRX cycles first DRX group based on a WUS indicator of the multiple WUS indicators corresponding to the first DRX group [824] (see par. 0063,0074,0077,0085). He fails to discloses a backup WUS indicator included in a second WUS of the multiple WUSs, the second WUS corresponding to a second DRX group different from the first DRX group. In another analogous art, Chang discloses a WUS indicator included in a second WUS of the multiple WUSs, the second WUS corresponding to a second DRX group different from the first DRX group [One UE may be configured or associated with multiple WUSs, including one or more common WUSs, one or more group WUSs, and one or more group combination WUSs] (see par. 0006), thereby, since it can wakeup with any of the configured WUSs, the second group WUS function as a backup. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to combine the teachings for the simple purpose of making sure the device wakeup and improving the reliability. As to claim 2, He discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: receive the one or more WUSs including the at least one WUS, wherein the at least one WUS corresponds to at least two DRX groups of the plurality of DRX groups (see fig. 8; par. 0081,0103). As to claim 3, He discloses the apparatus of claim 2, wherein the multiple WUS indicators included in the at least one WUS include a first WUS indicator and a second WUS indicator, the first WUS indicator comprising a wake-up indication bit for a first DRX group of the plurality of DRX groups, and the second WUS indicator comprising a backup wake-up indication bit for a second DRX group of the plurality of DRX groups [bitmap] (see fig. 8; par. 0077, 0081,0103). He does not use the word backup. However, in the absence of any measurable difference between the indicators, the first and second indicator can be the same and/or repeat information for redundance is a common and well-known technique. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to combine the teachings for the simple purpose of redundance improving the quality of communication and increased user satisfaction. As to claim 4, He discloses the apparatus of claim 2, wherein a number of the multiple WUS indicators included in each WUS of the multiple WUSs is less than or equal to a number of DRX groups of the plurality of DRX groups [the bitmap should have equal to a number of DRX groups of the plurality of DRX groups in order to indicate the group]; and, each WUS indicator of the multiple WUS indicators comprises a wake-up indication bit for a corresponding one or more DRX groups of the plurality of DRX groups [822] (see par. 0063,0074,0077,0085). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to combine the teachings for the simple purpose of indicating the group. As to claim 5, He discloses the apparatus of claim 4, wherein the determination whether to wake-up for or to sleep through the one or more DRX cycles for the plurality of DRX groups is based on a first WUS indicator of the multiple WUS indicators included in a first-received WUS of the one or more WUSs or a last WUS indicator of the multiple WUS indicators included in a last-received WUS of the one or more WUSs, the first-received WUS different from the last- received WUS. (see fig. 8, item 822 is the only WUS so it can be the first or the last; par. 0063,0074,0077,0080,0085,0100). As to claim 6, He discloses the apparatus of claim 4, wherein the determination whether to wake-up for or to sleep through the one or more DRX cycles for the plurality of DRX groups is based on the WUS corresponding to each of the plurality of DRX groups (see par. 0077,0084-0085). As to claims 7, 17 and 24, He discloses the apparatus and method, wherein the determination whether to wake-up for or to sleep through the multiple DRX cycles for the plurality of DRX groups is based on at least one radio resource control (RRC) field (see par. 0064). He fails to disclose priority WUS. In an analogous art, Chang discloses a highest priority WUS of the one or more WUSs (see par. 0009-0011). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to combine the teachings for the simple purpose of providing quality of service and increase user satisfaction. As to claim 8, He discloses the apparatus of claim 4, wherein the determination whether to wake-up for or to sleep through the one or more DRX cycles for the plurality of DRX groups is based on at least one radio resource control (RRC) flag (see par. 0064,0077,0081,0084-0085). As to claim 9, He discloses the apparatus of claim 4, wherein the determination whether to wake-up for or to sleep through the one or more DRX cycles for the plurality of DRX groups is based on a WUS with a least amount of payload bits in downlink control information (DCI) (see par. 0076-0077,0081,0084-0085). As to claim 10, He discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the multiple WUS indicators of the at least one WUS comprise multiple wake-up indication bits included in downlink control information (DCI), and wherein each wake-up indication bit of the multiple wake-up indication bits is corresponds to a respective one or more DRX groups of the plurality of DRX group [bitmap] (see par. 0076-0077,0081,0084-0085). As to claim 11, He discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of DRX configurations is associated with each of one or more frequency ranges (FRs) (see par. 0041). As to claim 12, He discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the plurality of DRX groups includes a first DRX group and a second DRX group, wherein the first DRX group is associated with a first DRX configuration of the plurality of DRX configurations and the second DRX group is associated with a second DRX configuration of the plurality of DRX configurations (see fig. 8; par. 0081,0103). Regarding claims 13-14, they are the corresponding method claims of apparatus claims 1-2. Therefore, claims 13-14 are rejected for the same reasons as shown above. Regarding claims 15-16, they are the corresponding method claims of apparatus claims 3-5. Therefore, claims 15-16 are rejected for the same reasons as shown above. As to claims 18 and 30, He discloses an apparatus [102,310,804] and method for wireless communication at a transmission-reception point (TRP), comprising: a memory [376]; and at least one processor [316,370,375] coupled to the memory and configured to: transmit a plurality of discontinuous reception (DRX) configurations [810,1208] for a plurality of DRX groups, wherein the plurality of DRX configurations is indicative of multiple wake-up signals (WUSs) corresponding to the plurality of DRX groups, and wherein each WUS of the multiple WUSs corresponds to a particular DRX group of the plurality of DRX groups; (see fig. 8; par. 0081,0103); and transmit the multiple (WUSs) corresponding to the plurality of DRX groups based on the plurality of DRX configurations, wherein each WUS of the multiple WUSs includes multiple WUS indicators and wherein the multiple WUS indicators comprise: a respective WUS indicator corresponding to the particular DRX group and one or more WUS indicators corresponding to a respective DRX group of other DRX groups of the plurality of DRX groups [614, 714, 822] (see par. 0077, 0084-0085); wherein the multiple WUS indicators of the included in each WUS is correspond to one or more DRX cycles for the plurality of DRX groups (see par. 0077,0081,0084-0085). Regarding claim 19, is the corresponding transmission-reception point claims of UE claim 2. Therefore, claim 19 is rejected for similar reasons as shown above. Regarding claims 20-23 and 25-29, they are the corresponding transmission-reception point claims of UE claims 3-6 and 8-12. Therefore, claims 19-23 and 25-29 are rejected for similar reasons as shown above. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARCOS L TORRES whose telephone number is (571)272-7926. The examiner can normally be reached 10:00 AM - 6:00 PM M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alison Slater can be reached on (571)270-0375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MARCOS L. TORRES Primary Examiner Art Unit 2647 /MARCOS L TORRES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Aug 04, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 31, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 07, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 26, 2026
Response Filed
May 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684326
Adaptive User-Controllable Wireless Emergency Alert Presentation
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12666238
VIDEO IN SUPPORT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES CALL LOCATION DATA
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659002
USER EQUIPMENT INDICATION OF ASSISTANCE INFORMATION IN BLOCKAGE PREDICTION REPORT
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659864
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BAND-BASED POWER SAVING IN A WIRELESS NETWORK
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12652703
SELECTING RANDOM ACCESS CHANNEL OCCASIONS FOR SUBBAND FULL-DUPLEX
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+11.4%)
3y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 701 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month