Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/010,315

PROCESSED BUCKWHEAT FLOUR, DRIED BUCKWHEAT NOODLE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 14, 2022
Priority
Jun 15, 2020 — JP 2020-103316 +1 more
Examiner
LEBLANC, KATHERINE DEGUIRE
Art Unit
1791
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Yamamoto Foods Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
34%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
70%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 34% of cases
34%
Career Allowance Rate
207 granted / 604 resolved
-30.7% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+35.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
655
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
94.3%
+54.3% vs TC avg
§102
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 604 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 31-40 in the reply filed on 1/23/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 24-30 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected method, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 1/23/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 31-40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim dependents from 24 which recites “wherein treatment conditions in the single screw extruder are determined in advance using a degree of pregelatinization of starch in the processed buckwheat flour and a molecular weight of a water extract of the processed buckwheat flour as indices.” It is unclear how the conditions are determined and how the degree of pregelatinization of starch in the processed buckwheat flour and a molecular weight of a water extract of the processed buckwheat flour as used as indices. Specifically, the claim provides no end goal to achieve in order to determine how these factors are used as indices. Regarding claim 34, it is unclear how the degree of pregelatinization of starch in the processed buckwheat flour is 50% or more when independent claim 24 requires the degree of pregelatinization of starch in the processed buckwheat flour to be 70% or more. Regarding claim 35, it is unclear how the degree of pregelatinization of starch in the processed buckwheat flour is 55 to 99% or more when independent claim 24 requires the degree of pregelatinization of starch in the processed buckwheat flour to be 70% or more. Prior Art JP 4403144B2 is the closest prior art. JP ‘144B2 teaches forming puffed buckwheat flour by “Using a biaxial extruder, water is added to buckwheat flour with a protein content of 10% by weight or less at 0.04 to 0.16 L / kg / hr, while a processing temperature is 50 to 100 ° C. and an extrusion pressure is 20 to 70 kg / cm 2. The method for producing pregelatinized buckwheat flour, comprising subjecting said buckwheat flour to a gelatinization treatment. The method for producing pregelatinized buckwheat flour according to claim 1, wherein the pregelatinization degree is 95% or more by the pregelatinization treatment. “ The flour is further ground and mixed with normal buckwheat flour and further processed to form noodle(see examples and claims). JP ‘144B2 specifically teaches the use and benefit of a twin screw extruder and does not render obvious using a single screw extruder as claimed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATHERINE D LEBLANC whose telephone number is (571)270-1136. The examiner can normally be reached 8AM-4PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nikki Dees can be reached at 571-270-3435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATHERINE D LEBLANC/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1791
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 14, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677858
MUSCLE ENHANCING PRODUCTS
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672735
INFANT FORMULA PREPARATION APPARATUS AND METHOD
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667116
METHODS OF COVERING FROZEN FOOD PRODUCTS IN CHOCOLATE
4y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667113
METHOD OF REMOVING SPORES FROM RAW GOAT MILK, PROCESS FOR PREPARING PURIFIED GOAT MILK, GOAT MILK ACCORDINGLY PRODUCED AND ITS USE AND CHEESE MAKING METHOD
4y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12622443
COLD BREW BEVERAGE
3y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
34%
Grant Probability
70%
With Interview (+35.8%)
3y 9m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 604 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month