Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/010,553

DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DELIVERING ELECTROPORATION THERAPY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 15, 2022
Priority
Jun 18, 2020 — provisional 63/040,751 +1 more
Examiner
GIULIANI, THOMAS ANTHONY
Art Unit
3794
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Abbott Laboratories
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
584 granted / 763 resolved
+6.5% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
799
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
35.9%
-4.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
29.9%
-10.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 763 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Currently, claims 1-5, 8, 10-12, and 19-26 are being examined, while the remaining claims have either been cancelled or are withdrawn. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 5, 8, and 26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Viswanathan, U.S. 10,130,423 (hereinafter Viswanathan). Regarding claim 1, Viswanathan discloses (note figs. 6 and 33A) an electroporation device comprising: a shaft (610/3310) having a proximal end and a distal end; and a conformable electrode assembly (i.e., basket) located at the distal end of the shaft, the electrode assembly having a first side and a second side opposite the first side (e.g., see splines on opposite sides of the basket), wherein the first side includes a first non-conductive portion (spline ‘614/3330’), a first electrode (proximal ‘616’; distal ‘3334’) centrally located on the first side and the second side includes a second electrode (corresponding electrode on the opposing spline), wherein the first electrode and the second electrode are configured to deliver irreversible electroporation therapy to tissue located adjacent to the first side of the electrode assembly (note col. 38, line 39; col. 40, line 21), wherein the first non-conductive portion is defined by a first surface area and the first electrode is defined by a second surface area, wherein the first surface area is greater than the second surface area (see figs. 6 and 33A). It should be noted that a recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. Regarding claim 5, Viswanathan discloses (see above) a device wherein the first non-conductive portion is flexible (the collapsable splines are necessarily flexible). Regarding claim 8, Viswanathan discloses (see above) an electroporation device wherein the second side includes a second non-conductive portion (opposing spline), wherein the second electrode is affixed to the second non-conductive portion and is centrally located on the second side, wherein the second non- conductive portion is defined by a third surface area and the second electrode is defined by a fourth surface area, wherein the third surface area is greater than the fourth surface area (see figs. 6 and 33A). Regarding claim 26, Viswanathan discloses (see above) an electroporation device further including a first plurality of ‘peripheral electrodes’ (see remainder of electrodes on corresponding spline) located on a ‘periphery’ of the first side of the conformable electrode assembly. Claim(s) 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Vakharia, U.S. 2009/0062792 (hereinafter Vakharia). Regarding claim 19, Vakharia discloses (note figs. 12-18) an electroporation therapy system comprising: a catheter comprising: a handle (170); a ‘conformable electrode assembly’ (124) having a first side (126a) and a second side (126b) ‘opposite’ the first side, wherein the first side includes a first non-conductive portion (136a), a first electrode (134a) affixed to the first non-conductive portion, and the second side includes a second electrode (134b), wherein the first electrode is centrally located (see fig. 13) and wherein the first non-conductive portion surrounds the first electrode in a plane defined by the first side (i.e., by the jaw surface – see fig. 13); and a shaft (122) coupled to the handle at a proximal end and to the electrode assembly at a distal end; and an electroporation generator (14) coupled to the catheter to deliver electroporation pulses between the first electrode and the second electrode to cause irreversible electroporation therapy to be delivered to tissue located adjacent to the first side of the electrode assembly (note paragraph 80). Claim(s) 1, 5, 8, and 26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Olson, U.S. 2022/0304745 (hereinafter Olson). The applied reference has a common Assignee with the instant application. Based upon the earlier effectively filed date of the reference, it constitutes prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). This rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) might be overcome by: (1) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(a) that the subject matter disclosed in the reference was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor of this application and is thus not prior art in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(A); (2) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(b) of a prior public disclosure under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) if the same invention is not being claimed; or (3) a statement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) establishing that, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, the subject matter disclosed in the reference and the claimed invention were either owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person or subject to a joint research agreement. Regarding claim 1, Olson discloses (note figs. 1 and 3) an electroporation device comprising: a shaft (122) having a proximal end and a distal end; and a conformable electrode assembly (i.e., basket) located at the distal end of the shaft, the electrode assembly having a first side and a second side opposite the first side (e.g., see splines on opposite sides of the basket), wherein the first side includes a first non-conductive portion (spline ‘202’), a first electrode (central ‘226’) centrally located on the first side and the second side includes a second electrode (corresponding electrode on the opposing spline), wherein the first electrode and the second electrode are configured to deliver irreversible electroporation therapy to tissue located adjacent to the first side of the electrode assembly (note paragraphs 26 and 50), wherein the first non-conductive portion is defined by a first surface area and the first electrode is defined by a second surface area, wherein the first surface area is greater than the second surface area (see fig. 3). It should be noted that a recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. Regarding claim 5, Olson discloses (see above) a device wherein the first non-conductive portion is flexible (the collapsable splines are necessarily flexible). Regarding claim 8, Olson discloses (see above) an electroporation device wherein the second side includes a second non-conductive portion (opposing spline), wherein the second electrode is affixed to the second non-conductive portion and is centrally located on the second side, wherein the second non- conductive portion is defined by a third surface area and the second electrode is defined by a fourth surface area, wherein the third surface area is greater than the fourth surface area (see fig. 3). Regarding claim 26, Olson discloses (see above) an electroporation device further including a first plurality of ‘peripheral electrodes’ (see remainder of electrodes on corresponding spline) located on a ‘periphery’ of the first side of the conformable electrode assembly. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claims have been considered but are moot because they do not apply to the current rejections. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-4, 10-12, and 20-25 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THOMAS ANTHONY GIULIANI whose telephone number is (571)270-3202. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 9:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joanne Rodden can be reached at 303-297-4276. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THOMAS A GIULIANI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Jan 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 29, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 30, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12758294
Continuous Flow Balloon Catheter Systems and Methods of Use
8y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12758312
ELECTROSURGICAL APPARATUS FOR CUTTING AND COAGULATION
3y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12758310
SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR ABLATION OF ENDOCARDIAL TISSUE
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12751858
Methods, Systems, and Devices for Treating Nerve Spasticity
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12746060
MODULATION OF TARGETED NERVE FIBERS
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+37.3%)
3y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 763 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month