Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/012,023

HOLLOW FIBER MEMBRANE MODULE FOR CROSS-FLOW FILTRATION AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 21, 2022
Priority
Jun 30, 2020 — JP 2020-112493 +1 more
Examiner
PATEL, PRANAV N
Art Unit
1777
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Toray Industries Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
446 granted / 651 resolved
+3.5% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
690
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
89.4%
+49.4% vs TC avg
§102
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§112
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 651 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 04/03/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 9-12, and 14-19 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. A broad range or limitation together with a narrow range or limitation that falls within the broad range or limitation (in the same claim) may be considered indefinite if the resulting claim does not clearly set forth the metes and bounds of the patent protection desired. See MPEP § 2173.05(c). In the present instance, claim 9 recites the broad recitation “350 ≤ Di ≤ 600”, and the claim also recites “the inner diameter Di of each of the hollow fiber membranes is 550 µm or less” which is the narrower statement of the range/limitation. The claim(s) are considered indefinite because there is a question or doubt as to whether the feature introduced by such narrower language is (a) merely exemplary of the remainder of the claim, and therefore not required, or (b) a required feature of the claims. Regarding Claim 9, the limitation “the method comprising performing crossflow filtration using the hollow fiber membrane module for cross-flow filtration according to claim 8” refers to claim 8 which recites “The hollow fiber membrane module for cross-flow filtration according to claim 1” refers to claim 1 which recites “350 ≤ Di ≤ 600”. Examiner recommends removing dependency of claim 9 from claim 8 and claim 1 and instead include limitations of claims 1 and 8 in claim 9 to address indefinites and ambiguity with regards to the claimed ranges. The range “350 ≤ Di ≤ 600” is missing units. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see remarks, filed 04/03/2026, with respect to rejection of claim 9 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claims 9-12 and 14-18 has been withdrawn. The affidavit under 37 CFR 1.132 filed 04/03/2026 is sufficient to overcome the rejection of claim 9 based upon 35 USC 103. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PRANAV PATEL whose telephone number is (571)272-5142. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bobby Ramdhanie can be reached at (571) 270-3240. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PRANAV N PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1777
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
May 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 31, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 04, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 03, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680060
INTEGRATED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR METHANE PRODUCTION USING OFF GAS RECYCLING TO ANAEROBIC DIGESTER FROM A GAS SEPARATION MEMBRANE UNIT
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668519
METHOD TO TREAT AND MINIMIZE SLUDGE FROM BIOREFINERIES
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12643071
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RECLAIMING SOLVENT
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12636620
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF ELEVATED ORGANIC CONTENT STREAMS
3y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636622
PREPARATION METHOD OF REVERSE OSMOSIS COMPOSITE MEMBRANE AND REVERSE OSMOSIS COMPOSITE MEMBRANE PREPARED THEREBY
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+21.8%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 651 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month