Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/012,435

ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES, COMPONENTS AND MATERIALS THEREFOR, AND METHODS THEREFOR

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Dec 22, 2022
Priority
Jun 30, 2020 — CA 3085190 +1 more
Examiner
HENDRICKSON, STUART L
Art Unit
1736
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Atlas Power Generation Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
722 granted / 998 resolved
+7.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1021
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
43.5%
+3.5% vs TC avg
§102
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§112
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 998 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 47, 48, 50, 61, 80 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 47 is unclear in that sodium perchlorate has a small cation and large anion, thus neither i) nor ii) apply because both ions have to be large or both have to be small. Does claim 47 want to say that it is the average of the two ions; (Cation+anion)/2? It is also unclear how the cations/anions relate to the electrolyte. Is the sodium perchlorate the electrolyte? If so, the cation is angstrom size, the anion is nm size and the average of the two is less than 1 nm so why is option i) even listed? Applicant's arguments filed 5/31/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. It is not clear what is being argued; the mention of tetraethyl BF4 does not appear relevant. If figure 24 is trying to say that ‘large ions cannot fit into small pores’ then this would be a self-evident fact that would not need pictorial evidence. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STUART L HENDRICKSON whose telephone number is (571)272-1351. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday from 9 to 5. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Anthony Zimmer, can be reached on 571-270-3591. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. /STUART L HENDRICKSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 22, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 31, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697602
ANTIBIOLOGICAL SORBENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE THEREOF
2y 12m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698400
CARBON-BASED NANOMATERIAL COMPOSITION AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAME FROM A GAS MIXTURE THAT INCLUDES ACETYLENE GAS
1y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692159
MANUFACTURING OF CARBON-CONTAINING PARTICLES
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686817
METHODS FOR SYNTHESIZING FLUORESCENT CQDs AND NITROGEN-PHOSPHORUS CO-DOPED FLUORESCENT CQDs AND APPLICATION THEREOF
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686617
BORON AND NITROGEN CO-DOPED GRAPHENE OXIDE GELS AND USES THEREOF
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+8.3%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 998 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month