Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/013,107

HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS FOR ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICES

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Dec 27, 2022
Priority
Jun 29, 2020 — EU 20182888.6 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, VU ANH
Art Unit
1762
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
UDC IRELAND Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
1267 granted / 1522 resolved
+18.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1534
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1522 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 32 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The symbols “o” are undefined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 20, 34, 36, 39 and 41-47 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US 2021/0273165 A1 to Kuwabara et al. Regarding claim 20, Kuwabara et al. discloses an OLED comprising the compound PNG media_image1.png 242 210 media_image1.png Greyscale , which is exemplified by PNG media_image2.png 202 302 media_image2.png Greyscale (p. 10). This compound is representative of the claimed compound wherein Z1 = B, Y = N(Ph), Z2 = V1 = N, W1 = C, V2 = CH, X1-3 = CH, and the ring Ara is a benzene ring. Claim 20 is therefore unpatentable. So are claims 41-47. The features of claims 34, 36 and 39 are disclosed on page 34. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 21-25, 28, 30-31 and 33 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 32 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The features set forth in these claims are not disclosed or suggested by Kuwabara et al. (above) or Shin et al. (discussed previously), which represent the closest prior art of record. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VU ANH NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5454. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ROBERT JONES can be reached at (571) 270-7733. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VU A NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1762
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 27, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
May 26, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703779
PROCESS FOR DEPOLYMERIZING POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE (PET) BY GLYCOLYSIS WITH ETHYLENE GLYCOL, AND PLANT FOR CARRYING OUT THE SAME
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701914
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENCE DEVICE COMPRISING AN AZINE COMPOUND AND A RARE EARTH METAL, RARE EARTH METAL COMPOUND, AND/OR RARE EARTH METAL COMPLEX AND AN ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT COMPRISING SAID ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENCE DEVICE
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698273
COMPOUND FOR ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE, COMPOSITION FOR ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE, ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698275
COMPOUND FOR ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE, COMPOSITION FOR ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE, ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698403
ADHESION PROMOTING COMPOSITIONS AND METHOD OF IMPROVING FUEL RESISTANCE OF A COATED ARTICLE
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.9%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1522 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month