Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/014,823

Tilting Vehicle With a Carrier Device

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jan 06, 2023
Priority
Aug 31, 2020 — DE 10 2020 122 627.6 +1 more
Examiner
WILHELM, TIMOTHY
Art Unit
3617
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
3 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
884 granted / 1124 resolved
+26.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1153
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
79.5%
+39.5% vs TC avg
§102
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1124 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action was made in response to an amendment filed 10/6/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 7-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chen et al (CN 211364786). Chen discloses: With regard to claim 7 - A tilting vehicle comprising: a rear portion 40, and a carrier device 10, 20 connected to the rear portion, wherein: the carrier device 10, 20 comprises a receiving portion 20 for detachable fastening of a luggage container and is connected to the rear portion 40 by at least one first support 31, 32 in a region of the receiving portion 20 and is connected to the rear portion by at least one second support 30 arranged spaced apart from the at least one first support 31, 32, the at least one first support 31, 32 is formed such that the at least one first support 31, 32 does not transmit any torque; the at least one first support 31, 32 comprises an elastic connection element (skid-proof cushion 35) for uncoupling a movement of the carrier device 20 with respect to the rear portion 40; and the at least one second support 30 is formed as a rigid connection (see Fig. 1). With regard to claim 8 - wherein the at least one first support 31, 32 is formed as a fixed bearing (see Fig. 3). With regard to claim 9 - wherein the at least one first support 31, 32 is formed as a cylinder joint (see Fig. 3). With regard to claim 14 - wherein the luggage container 50 is a case or a bag. With regard to claim 15 - wherein the luggage container 50 is a top case (see Fig. 3). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 12 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen. Chen fails to disclose wherein a spacing of the at least one second support from the at least one first support has a value between 5 and 40 cm. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to form the carrier device such that a spacing of the at least one second support from the at least one first support has a value between 5 and 40 cm, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 7-9 and 12-15 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIMOTHY WILHELM whose telephone number is (571)272-6980. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Paul Dickson can be reached at 571-272-7742. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIMOTHY WILHELM/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3614 January 22, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 06, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Oct 06, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 24, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679486
ROBOT
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679493
BICYCLE FRAME WITH VIBRATION ISOLATION
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679444
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AN ELECTRIC STEERING SYSTEM
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673550
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING DIFFERENTIAL WHEEL SPEEDS OF MULTI-INDEPENDENT-WHEEL DRIVE VEHICLES
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674507
GEAR CONTROL SYSTEM FOR VIBRATION ATTENUATION
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+11.8%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1124 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month