Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/014,831

METHOD FOR PRODUCING AN ELASTOMERIC COMPONENT COMPRISING A PRINTED STRUCTURE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jan 06, 2023
Examiner
TUGBANG, ANTHONY D
Art Unit
2896
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Dätwyler Schweiz AG
OA Round
4 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
816 granted / 1058 resolved
+9.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1098
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
50.2%
+10.2% vs TC avg
§102
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1058 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment The following is in reply to the applicants submission (e.g. amendment, remarks, etc.) filed on February 24, 2026. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Election/Restrictions Claims 31 through 34 continue to remain as being withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on October 30, 2024. Response to Arguments Applicants arguments filed as part of their submission with respect to Claims 17 through 30 and 35 have been fully considered, but are now moot because the following new grounds of rejections do not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claims 17 through 20, 22 through 25 and 27 through 30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Japanese Patent Publication, JP 2015-228533 (hereinafter “JP’533”)1. Claim 17: JP’533 discloses a method for producing an elastomeric component comprising an elastomer body with a shape and a non-planar, 3-dimensional surface (e.g. Fig. 4); and a printed structure adapted to the nonplanar, 3-dimensional surface of the elastomer body, the method comprising: providing a planar flexible foil (e.g. 7) of thermoplastic material having a printable surface and a thickness ranging from 25 to 75 µm (e.g. 5 to 50 µm, ¶ [0021]); printing a structure (e.g. 4, 4A) onto the printable surface of the planer flexible foil to obtain the printed structure (e.g. Figs. 2a, 2b, ¶ [0022]); providing an elastomer substrate (e.g. 3, 31) for forming the elastomer body of the elastomeric component (e.g. Fig. 3b); placing the planar flexible foil having the printed structure onto the elastomer substrate (e.g. Fig. 3a, ¶ [0033]); and laminating the combined planar flexible foil and elastomer substrate by applying heat and pressure (e.g. ¶ [0034]), wherein the elastomeric component is obtained in that, the elastomer substrate is formed to the shape of the elastomer body of the elastomeric component before the laminating (e.g. Fig. 3b, as 3, 31 is separated from 2, 37), wherein the planar flexible foil with the printed structure is adopted to the non-planar, 3-dimensional surface of the elastomer body (e.g. Fig. 4). Claim 18: JP’533 discloses the method according to claim 17, wherein the planar flexible foil has elastic properties and the printed structure is at least stretchable without forming cracks when stretched (e.g. Fig. 4, JP’533 does not mention any cracks). Claim 19: JP’533 discloses the method according to claim 17, wherein, during the laminating, the heat and pressure treatment creates chemical bonding between the planar flexible foil and the elastomer substrate of the elastomer body (e.g. ¶ [0034]). Claim 20: JP’533 discloses the method according to claim 17, wherein [[the]] a temperature used for the laminating ranges from 120°C to 160°C (e.g. greater than 40°C, ¶ [0033]). Claim 22: JP’533 discloses the method according to claim 17, wherein, after the printing, the printed structure is at least one of cured and dried (e.g. in Fig. 2c) before the placing is performed. Claim 23: JP’533 discloses the method according to claim 17, wherein, after the printing, the printed structure is protected with a second foil (e.g. 8) of the same material as the planar flexible foil (e.g. Fig. 2c, ¶ [0021]). Claim 24: JP’533 discloses the method according to claim 17, wherein the planar flexible foil is placed on the elastomer substrate for forming the elastomer body such that the printed structure faces the elastomer body (e.g. Fig. 3a). Claim 25: JP’533 discloses the method according to claim 17, wherein the elastomer substrate for forming the elastomer body is made of a thermoplastic elastomer (e.g. ¶ [0021]). Claim 27: JP’533 discloses the method according to claim 17, wherein the planar flexible foil further comprises electronic components (e.g. 17) connected to the printed structure (e.g. Fig. 3a). Claim 28: JP’533 discloses the method according to claim 17, wherein a surface of the elastomer substrate (e.g. 3, 31) for forming the elastomer body for circuit placing the printed structure is formed into a non-planar surface during the laminating (e.g. by embedding 17 within 31, Fig. 3a) and wherein the printed structure is a printed electronic structure or circuit. Claim 29: JP’533 discloses the method according to claim 17, wherein the elastomeric component is an elastomeric sealing component (e.g. by sealing 17) and the printed structure is a printed electronic structure or circuit. Claim 30: JP’533 discloses the method according to claim 17, wherein a surface of the elastomer substrate for forming the elastomer body is modified with a bonding agent (e.g. 9, Fig. 2) to achieve a better bonding between the planar flexible foil and the elastomer substrate for forming the elastomer body before the laminating (e.g. Fig. 3b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claim 21 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP’533 in view of U.S. Publication 2015/0305150 to Ohata (hereinafter “Ohata”). JP’533 discloses the claimed manufacturing method as relied upon above in Claim 17. JP’533 does not teach that a surface of the elastomer substrate for forming the elastomer body is modified for achieving a better bonding between the planar flexible foil and the elastomer substrate for forming the elastomer body before laminating. Ohata teaches that a surface of a elastomer substrate (e.g. 2) can be modified with a surface treatment (e.g. by plasma or UV rays) for achieving better bonding strength between a foil (e.g. 8) and the elastomer substrate before laminating (e.g. ¶ [0038]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the surface of the elastomer substrate of JP’533 with a surface treatment of plasma or UV rays before laminating, as taught by Ohata, to achieving better bonding strength between the planar flexible foil and the elastomer substrate. Claim 26 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP’533 in view of U.S. Publication 2017/0142839 to Aleksov et al (hereinafter “Aleksov”). JP’533 discloses the claimed manufacturing method as relied upon above in Claim 17. JP’533 does not teach that the planar flexible foil is made of at least one of a material selected from thermoplastic polyurethane, liquid silicone rubber, fluoropolymer, ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene, and expanded fluoropolymers. Aleksov teaches that a planar foil (e.g. 11, Fig. 1) that is made of thermoplastic polyurethane provides properties that allow the foil to be flexible and elastic (e.g. ¶ [0025]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have formed the planar flexible foil of JP’533 with the thermoplastic polyurethane material taught by Aleksov, to provide equivalent properties of flexibility and elasticity in forming the elastomeric component. Claim 35 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP’533. JP’533 discloses most of the limitations of Claim 35 to the extent that all of the limitations of Claim 17 are recited in Claim 35. JP’533 further discloses the planar flexible foil can be formed such that printed structures are printed on both top and bottom surfaces of the planar flexible foil (e.g. double sided, ¶ [0030]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention that when the planar flexible foil is placed on the elastomeric substrate (e.g. in Fig. 3a), the printed structure (e.g. 4 on bottom surface of 7) would face away from the elastomer body (e.g. 3, 31, in Fig. 3a or 4). Conclusion Applicants amendment filed as part of their submission has necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to A. DEXTER TUGBANG whose telephone number is (571)272-4570. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JESSICA HAN can be reached at (571) 272-2078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A. DEXTER TUGBANG/Primary Examiner Art Unit 2896 1 The interpretation of JP’533 was taken from a Machine Translation in English, a copy of which was provided by applicants in their Information Disclosure Statement on January 26, 2023.
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 06, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jun 06, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 26, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Sep 29, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 06, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 06, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 28, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 31, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Feb 18, 2026
Interview Requested
Feb 24, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 24, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 24, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 04, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597663
Method for Producing a High-Voltage Battery Unit and a High-Voltage Battery Unit
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597593
Manufacturing Method for Traceability of Battery Electrodes with Fiducial Markers
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597834
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING STATOR FOR ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598707
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING MULTI-LAYER CIRCUIT BOARD INCLUDING EXTREME FINE VIA AND MULTI-LAYER CIRCUIT BOARD MANUFACTURED BY THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597558
SPIRAL CORE CURRENT TRANSFORMER FOR ENERGY HARVESTING APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.6%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1058 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month