Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/015,092

HOUSEHOLD GLASSWARE PRODUCT OBTAINED FROM CULLET AND THE PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jan 09, 2023
Priority
Jul 08, 2020 — TÜ 2020/10857 +1 more
Examiner
ABU ALI, SHUANGYI
Art Unit
1731
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Turkiye Sise Ve Cam Fabrikalari Anonim Sirketi
OA Round
2 (Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allowance Rate
483 granted / 1066 resolved
-19.7% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+37.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1122
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
77.7%
+37.7% vs TC avg
§102
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1066 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-7 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The applicant fails to mark and show the changes of the claim 1 which recites “at least 95% by weight of the soda-lime, internal glass cullet, and a mixture of the recycling glass cullet and the internal-silica glass cullet selected from the group consisting of recycling glass cullet glass cullet”. It is not clear the meaning of “at least 95% by weight of the soda-lime, internal glass cullet, and a mixture of the recycling glass cullet and the internal-silica glass cullet selected from the group consisting of recycling glass cullet glass cullet” of claim 1.The claims are generally narrative and indefinite, failing to conform with current U.S. practice. They appear to be a literal translation into English from a foreign document and are replete with grammatical and idiomatic errors. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-7 and 9 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHUANGYI ABU ALI whose telephone number is (571)272-6453. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:00 am- 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Orlando can be reached at (571)270-3149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHUANGYI ABU ALI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 09, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 02, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679783
Ceramic Reinforced Metal Composite For Hermetic Bodies For Implantable Devices
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671033
DIELECTRIC COMPOSITION FOR MULTILAYERED CERAMIC CAPACITOR,MULTILAYERED CERAMIC CAPACITOR COMPRISING SAME, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR CAPACITOR
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12653653
METHOD OF PRODUCING BLOCK FOR DENTAL PROSTHESES, AND METHOD OF PRODUCING DENTAL PROSTHESIS
4y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12643824
BUILDING MATERIALS AND COMPONENTS AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12638124
FORMALDEHYDE FREE COMPOSITES MADE WITH CARBOHYDRATE AND ALPHA-CARBON NUCLEOPHILE BINDER COMPOSITIONS
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+37.9%)
4y 1m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1066 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month