Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/015,107

FOV EXPANSION DEVICE FOR USE IN A NEAR-EYE DISPLAY

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jan 09, 2023
Examiner
LIU, SHAN
Art Unit
2871
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Lumus LTD.
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
436 granted / 606 resolved
+3.9% vs TC avg
Strong +40% interview lift
Without
With
+40.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
636
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
59.5%
+19.5% vs TC avg
§102
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§112
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 606 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment and Arguments The amendment filed 08/04/2025 has been entered. Claims 1-4, 6-10, 12, and 14-15 are currently pending in this application. Applicant’s arguments, see Pages 5-8, filed 08/04/2025, with respect to the claim(s) 1-4, 6-10, 12, and 14-15 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant states "…Support for these amendments can be found in the specification as filed, and in particular, in paragraph [0044]. The dependent claims have been amended to maintain consistency with claim 1. No new matter has been added…". Examiner respectfully disagrees. As explicitly stated in the paragraph [0044] of the application, the electronic corrections is applied to an SLM (spatial light modulator). None of the originally filed specification states that the SLM (spatial light modulator), which the electronic corrections is applied to, is an image generator of the POD. Therefore, the claim limitation of “a chromatic aberration introduced by the FOV expansion device is mitigated by electronic corrections applied to an image generator of the POD” in claim 1 is not supported by the originally filed disclosure. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 1, line 4 AND line 6, "an image" should read - -the image- - Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-4, 6-10, 12, and 14-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 1, the limitation of “a chromatic aberration introduced by the FOV expansion device is mitigated by electronic corrections applied to an image generator of the POD” in amended Claim 1, Lines 27-28 is not described in the specification at the time the application was filed. As explicitly stated in the paragraph [0044] of the application, the electronic corrections is applied to an SLM (spatial light modulator). None of the originally filed specification states that the SLM (spatial light modulator), which the electronic corrections is applied to, is an image generator of the POD. Therefore, the claim limitation of “a chromatic aberration introduced by the FOV expansion device is mitigated by electronic corrections applied to an image generator of the POD” in claim 1 is not supported by the originally filed disclosure. This is a new matter rejection. Dependent claims 2-4, 6-10, 12, and 14-15 would be rejected by virtue of their dependency. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAN LIU whose telephone number is (571)270-0383. The examiner can normally be reached on 9am-5pm EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Carruth can be reached on 571-272-9791. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAN LIU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 09, 2023
Application Filed
May 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Aug 04, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 08, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Apr 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596033
LIGHT SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591114
OPTICAL LENS ASSEMBLY AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12578588
LENS DRIVING APPARATUS AND CAMERA MODULE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12560837
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND VIRTUAL REALITY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12560822
LIQUID CRYSTAL PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+40.4%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 606 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month