DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
This action is in response to the communication(s) filed on 08/28/2026.
Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114
A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 08/28/2026 has been entered.
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim(s) 1, 4-6, 8-17, 28, and 49-50 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al. (U.S. Pub. 20200119797) in view of Davydov et al. (U.S. Pub. 20190230699).
Regarding claim 1 Wang disclose, a CSI measurement reporting method, comprising:
determining, by a terminal, an antenna port parameter related to the terminal and an association relationship between the antenna port parameter and one resource element according to a first predefined rule or configuration information of a network-side device para. 135, “the configuration information includes a resource set of one group of the at least two groups of CSI-RS resources, where the resource set includes identification information or antenna port information of the other group of the at least two groups of CSI-RS resources or a reporting set, a resource set, or association information corresponding to the other group of CSI-RS resources”;
wherein the antenna port parameter is used for receiving and measuring a Channel State Information, CSI, reference signal para. 158, “FIG. 4 includes the following steps. 410. A network device sends configuration information to a terminal device”,
receiving and measuring, by the terminal, a Channel State Information, CSI, reference signal in at least one resource element configured by the network-side device according to determined antenna port parameter para. 158, “after the terminal device obtains the configuration information, the terminal device jointly reports CSI, for example, reports one CQI, for the associated two groups of CSI-RS resources based on the association relationship between the two groups of CSI-RS resources”,
generating and reporting, by the terminal, a reporting quantity to the network-side device according to a measurement result of measuring the CSI reference signal in the at least one resource element para. 158, “Therefore, after the terminal device obtains the configuration information, the terminal device jointly reports CSI, for example, reports one CQI, for the associated two groups of CSI-RS resources based on the association relationship between the two groups of CSI-RS resources”.
wherein the reporting quantity comprises the measurement result of measuring the CSI reference signal and the antenna port parameter para. 261, “the terminal device reports a CQI for a CSI-RS resource corresponding to relatively small (or relatively large) identification information, reports a CQI for a CSI-RS resource corresponding to a relatively small (or relatively large) antenna port number, reports a CQI for a CSI-RS resource corresponding to relatively small (or relatively large) association information, or reports a CQI for a CSI-RS resource corresponding to relatively small (or relatively large) reporting set identification information. A specific reporting manner may be predefined in a protocol, or may be notified by the network device to the terminal device via signaling”.
Wang does not specifically disclose, an antenna port parameter related to the terminal and an association relationship between the antenna port parameter and one resource element. However, Davydov teach, an antenna port parameter related to the terminal and an association relationship between the antenna port parameter and one resource element “calculation, at the UE 102, of the transport block size (TBS) according to the resource allocation size, the number of CSI-RS antenna ports and other parameters; determination of the number of available resource elements for data transmission in a subframe”, see para. 126.
Wang and Davydov are analogous because they pertain to the field of wireless communication and, more specifically, to control channel parameters.
Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Davydov in the system of Wang so the user equipment can identify its assigned antenna port and the value of the relevant parameter to get the transmissions intended to be received. The motivation for doing so would have been to ensure the proper and efficient antenna mapping configuration to benefit the user equipment transmissions.
Regarding claim 4 Wang disclose, wherein the configuration information of the network-side device comprises:
indication information for indicating the terminal to use a same antenna port parameter or different antenna port parameters to receive and measure the CSI reference signal in the at least one resource element para. 266, “if there are two antenna ports or antenna port groups, and there are two pieces of QCL indication information, a first antenna port or antenna port group corresponds to a first piece of QCL indication information, and a second antenna port or antenna port group corresponds to a second piece of QCL indication information.”; or
an antenna port parameter;
wherein the antenna port parameter is the antenna port parameter used by the terminal to receive and measure the CSI reference signal in the at least one resource element para. 266, “For example, QCL indication information is configured for each antenna port or antenna port group. In this case, same or different QCL indication information may be configured for all antenna ports or antenna port groups”. The claim list features in the alternative. While the claim lists a number of optional limitations only one limitation from the list is required and needs to be met by the prior art. The Examiner has chosen the first of the alternatives.
Regarding claim 5 Wang disclose, wherein determining, by the terminal, the antenna port parameter according to the first predefined rule, comprises:
determining, by the terminal, the antenna port parameter from candidate antenna port parameters corresponding to the terminal according to the predefined rule, para. 135, “the configuration information includes a resource set of one group of the at least two groups of CSI-RS resources, where the resource set includes identification information or antenna port information of the other group of the at least two groups of CSI-RS resources or a reporting set, a resource set, or association information corresponding to the other group of CSI-RS resources”.
Regarding claim 6 Wang disclose, wherein the first predefined rule comprises at least one of:
Rule 1: determining that antenna port parameters corresponding to different resource elements or CSI reference signals in resource elements are same or different according to a quantity of resource elements or a quantity of CSI reference signals in resource elements para. 52, “in an implementation of the first aspect, a quantity of CQIs in the jointly reported CSI is determined based on a quantity of reporting sets or resource sets of the M groups of CSI-RS resources, or a quantity of CQIs in the CSI is determined based on a quantity of reported CQIs that is configured in a reporting set of the M groups of CSI-RS resources”;
Rule 2: determining that antenna port parameters are different according to at least two resource elements with a same index or CSI reference signals in the resource elements;
Rule 3: determining that antenna port parameters are same or different according to at least two resource elements with different indexes or CSI reference signals in the resource elements;
Rule 4: determining that antenna port parameters are different according to at least two resource elements with a same spatial Quasi-Co-Location, QCL, relation or CSI reference signals in the resource elements;
Rule 5: determining that antenna port parameters are same or different according to at least two resource elements with different spatial QCL relations or CSI reference signals in the resource elements; or
Rule 6: a predefined correspondence between resource elements and antenna port parameters. The claim list features in the alternative. While the claim lists a number of optional limitations only one limitation from the list is required and needs to be met by the prior art. The Examiner has chosen the first of the alternatives.
Regarding claim 8 Wang disclose, wherein the terminal generates the reporting quantity in a following way:
reporting, by the terminal, one reporting quantity for each resource element; or reporting, by the terminal, one reporting quantity for all resource elements. para. 52, “in an implementation of the first aspect, a quantity of CQIs in the jointly reported CSI is determined based on a quantity of reporting sets or resource sets of the M groups of CSI-RS resources”; or
reporting, by the terminal, one reporting quantity for every N/M resource elements, wherein N is a quantity of resource elements, and M is a quantity of reporting quantities configured or predefined by network. The claim list features in the alternative. While the claim lists a number of optional limitations only one limitation from the list is required and needs to be met by the prior art. The Examiner has chosen the first of the alternatives.
Regarding claim 9 Wang disclose, wherein types of the resource elements comprise at least one of CSI resource setting, CSI resource set in the CSI resource setting, CSI resource or SSB resource para. 102, “the CSI reporting set is used to indicate reported parameter information (for example, an RI, a PMI, a CQI, or a CSI-RS resource indicator (CRI))”. The claim list features in the alternative. While the claim lists a number of optional limitations only one limitation from the list is required and needs to be met by the prior art. The Examiner has chosen the first of the alternatives.
Regarding claim 10 Wang disclose, wherein in response to the network-side device configuring at least two resource elements
the at least two resource elements are resource elements with same or different time-domain transmission characteristics para. 24, “where the association relationship between the at least two groups of CSI-RS resources includes an association relationship between identifiers of the at least two groups of CSI-RS resources or an association relationship between antenna ports of the at least two resources”; or
the at least two resource elements are CSI resource sets corresponding to a same periodic CSI resource setting; or
the at least two resource elements are CSI resource sets corresponding to a same semi-persistent CSI resource setting; or
the at least two resource elements are aperiodic CSI resource sets associated with an aperiodic trigger state; or
the at least two resource elements are CSI resources comprised in a same CSI resource setting or CSI resource set. The claim list features in the alternative. While the claim lists a number of optional limitations only one limitation from the list is required and needs to be met by the prior art. The Examiner has chosen the first of the alternatives.
Regarding claim 11 Wang disclose, wherein the terminal receives the CSI reference signal in the at least one resource element configured by the network-side device in a following way. para. 12, “receiving, by the terminal device, the CSI-RSs carried on the at least two groups of CSI-RS resources”: receiving, by the terminal, the CSI reference signal in the at least one resource element configured by the network-side device on a same time domain resource or different time domain resources para. 103, “Configuration information of a CSI-RS resource includes a mapped resource element (RE), a quantity of antenna ports, time domain behavior”.
Claim 12 recites a method corresponding to the method of claim 1 and thus is rejected under the same reason set forth in the rejection of claim 1.
Regarding claims 13-14 the limitations of claims 13-14, respectively, are rejected in the same manner as analyzed above with respect to claims 4-5, respectively.
Regarding claims 15-16 the limitations of claims 15-16, respectively, are rejected in the same manner as analyzed above with respect to claims 9-10, respectively.
Regarding claim 17 Wang disclose, a terminal, comprising a processor para. 336, “processor 110”, a memory “memory 120” and a transceiver “transceiver unit 101”; furthermore claim 17 recites an apparatus corresponding to the system of claim 1 and thus is rejected under the same reason set forth in the rejection of claim 1.
Regarding claim 28 Wang disclose, a network-side device, comprising a processor read as: “processor 210”, a memory read as: “the memory 220” see para. 349; furthermore claim 28 recites an apparatus corresponding to the system of claim 12 and thus is rejected under the same reason set forth in the rejection of claim 12.
Claim 49 recites a computer–program product corresponding to the method of claim 1 and thus is rejected under the same reason set forth in the rejection of claim 1.
Claim 50 recites a computer–program product corresponding to the method of claim 12 and thus is rejected under the same reason set forth in the rejection of claim 12.
Conclusion
The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Shimezawa et al. (U.S. Pub. 20190207663) which disclose(s) terminal device, base station apparatus and communication method.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAUL RIVAS whose telephone number is (571)270–5590. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday – Friday, from 8:30am to 5:00pm.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sujoy K. Kundu, can be reached on (571) 272 - 8586. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571–273–8300.
Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center to authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to the USPTO patent electronic filing system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800–786–9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571–272–1000.
/RR/
Examiner, Art Unit 2471
/SUJOY K KUNDU/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2471
