Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/016,914

CERTAINTY-BASED CLASSIFICATION NETWORKS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 19, 2023
Priority
Jul 24, 2020 — GB 2011510.1 +1 more
Examiner
CAMPOS, ALFREDO
Art Unit
2129
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
ARM Limited
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
70%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
11 granted / 14 resolved
+23.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -8% lift
Without
With
+-8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
42
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
35.0%
-5.0% vs TC avg
§103
41.0%
+1.0% vs TC avg
§102
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§112
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 14 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 8/26/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 2-5 and 11-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 2 and analogous 11, the limitation of claim 2 recites “and each MC certainty is calculated based on an entropy of the output node probabilities of the associated classes” the claim is render indefinite as the claim 1 recites “determines the MC certainty by calculating an entropy of probabilities generated by the pre-trained machine learning main classifier” both limitations state calculating “an entropy” based on the machine learning main classifier. The claim is indefinite as to if the claims refer to the same entropy that was previously calculated or a different entropy value as claim 2 depends on claim 1 and claim 11 depends on claim 10. All dependent claims inherit the issue. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 6-9 and 10, 15-18 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art of record teaches limitations as noted in the previous Office Action 08/03/2026. See previous Office Action noting allowable subject matter. Also the examiner agrees with applicant’s remarks dates 8/26/2026. Claim 2-5 and 11-14 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The remaining Independent claim 10 is allowable for the same reasons cited in claim 1. The remaining claims would be allowable because they depend on one of allowable independent claims 1 and 10. Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kamhi et al. (US2017015776A1) - teaches calculating entropy for each set of classes in a set to measure the amount of uncertainty in the dataset. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALFREDO CAMPOS whose telephone number is (571)272-4504. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00 - 4:00 pm M - F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael J. Huntley can be reached at (303) 297-4307. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALFREDO CAMPOS/Examiner, Art Unit 2129 /MICHAEL J HUNTLEY/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2129
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Feb 18, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 18, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 04, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 26, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12762390
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PARAMETER MULTIPLEXED GRADIENT DESCENT
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12749011
DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OPERATION THEREOF
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12682285
PROVIDING A SECURE AND COLLABORATIVE FEEDBACK MECHANISM FOR MACHINE LEARNING MODELS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12651086
METHOD AND SERVER FOR DEFENDING SERVICE FROM PERSONAL PRIVACY INFERENCE ATTACK
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12561407
ONE-PASS APPROACH TO AUTOMATED TIMESERIES FORECASTING
4y 3m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
70%
With Interview (-8.3%)
3y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 14 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month