Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/017,337

DISPLAY PANEL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, DISPLAY DEVICE AND SPLICING DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112§DP
Filed
Jan 20, 2023
Examiner
YEUNG LOPEZ, FEIFEI
Art Unit
2899
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
858 granted / 1060 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Minimal -3% lift
Without
With
+-3.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
1107
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
52.0%
+12.0% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1060 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 1,2,4,5,7-20 are allowable. The restriction requirement between method and device inventions , as set forth in the Office action mailed on September 18, 2025, has been reconsidered in view of the allowability of claims to the elected invention pursuant to MPEP § 821.04(a). The restriction requirement is hereby withdrawn as to any claim that requires all the limitations of an allowable claim. Specifically, the restriction requirement of September 18, 2025 is fully withdrawn. Claims 16-18, directed to the method invention no longer withdrawn from consideration because the claim(s) requires all the limitations of an allowable claim. In view of the above noted withdrawal of the restriction requirement, applicant is advised that if any claim presented in a divisional application is anticipated by, or includes all the limitations of, a claim that is allowable in the present application, such claim may be subject to provisional statutory and/or nonstatutory double patenting rejections over the claims of the instant application. Once a restriction requirement is withdrawn, the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 121 are no longer applicable. See In re Ziegler, 443 F.2d 1211, 1215, 170 USPQ 129, 131-32 (CCPA 1971). See also MPEP § 804.01. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3 and 6 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 3, the claim first depicts “same side surface” to be the vertical surface (13 in fig. 5C) by stating “second lead segments of at least two connection leads located at a same side surface are arranged at intervals in a first direction; the first direction is parallel to a boundary line” (W of fig. 5C)“ of the same side surface and the second surface” (12 of fig. 5C). Then, “the same side surface” seems to be mixed up with “the second side surface” (bottom surface 12) by stating “at least two openings located at the same side surface are arranged at intervals in the first direction; an opening in the at least two openings exposes at least a portion of a second lead segment of a connection lead in the at least two connection leads.” Regarding claim 6, it is unclear to what the sub-segments get closer to in “second sub-segments of at least two connection leads located at a same side surface get closer.” Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1,2,4,5,7-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Prior art does not teach “a second lead segment located on the second surface and in contact with the second surface” (claims 1 and 15). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FEIFEI YEUNG LOPEZ whose telephone number is (571)270-1882. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8am to 4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dale Page can be reached at 571 270 7877. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FEIFEI YEUNG LOPEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2899
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 20, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604577
MICRO-LED ENCAPSULATED STRUCTURE INCLUDING TWO POLYMERIC LAYERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598839
LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE FOR DISPLAY AND DISPLAY APPARATUS HAVING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598950
ELECTROSTATIC CHUCK HEATER AND FILM DEPOSITION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589462
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593727
DISPLAY DEVICE USING SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT-EMITTING DIODES, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (-3.0%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1060 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month