Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/018,442

RECOMBINANT VACCINIA VIRUS

Final Rejection §102§103§112
Filed
Jan 27, 2023
Priority
Jul 31, 2020 — JP 2020-130717 +3 more
Examiner
JADHAO, SAMADHAN JAISING
Art Unit
1672
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Shiga University Of Medical Science
OA Round
2 (Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allowance Rate
26 granted / 50 resolved
-8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +46% interview lift
Without
With
+45.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
104
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
61.5%
+21.5% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 50 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Final Rejection Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority 2. This application is 371 of PCT/JP2021/029240 filed on 07/30/2021 and claims foreign priority to JP2020-130717 filed on 07/31/2020, JP2020-215454 filed on 12/24/2020 and JP2021-078781 filed on 05/06/2021. Status of Claims 3. Claims 1-3, 5, and 7-17 as amended and filed on 02/18/2026 are pending. Information Disclosure Statement 4. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 04/10/2023, 10/03/2023, 01/17/2025, and 04/11/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97 and are considered by the examiner. Drawings 5. Drawings filed on 01/27/2023 are considered and acknowledged. Withdrawn Claim Rejections 6. Withdrawn rejection of claims 1, 5 and 8-11 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) in view of applicant’s amendment to claim 1 filed on 02/18/2026, that also affected scope of the dependent claims 5 and 8-11. 7. Withdrawn rejection of claims 1-3, 5, and 7-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 in view of applicant’s amendment to claim 1 filed on 02/18/2026 that also affected scope of the dependent claims 2-3, 5 and 7-11. Objection to Specification (New) 8. The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The instant specification (filed on 01/27/2023) para [0043] recites, the mutant gene of SEQ ID NO: 3 comprises T (thymine) to C (cytosine) substitutions at positions 2445, 2448, 4998, 5001 and 6000, and G (guanine) to A (alanine) substitution at position 2539 (i.e., 6 nucleotide substitutions in total) in the nucleotide sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 1. The instant SEQ ID NO: 3 has a nucleotide base Adenine (A) at position 2539, and not an amino acid Alanine. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 (New) 9. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 10. Claims 1 and dependent claims 2-3, 5, and 7-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. 11. Claims 1-3, 5, and 7-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The instant claim 1 limitation recites the base at position 2539 in the nucleotide sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 3 is alanine. It is not clear how the nucleic acid (DNA) sequence has an amino acid alanine at position 2539. The instant specification para [0043] also recites at position 2539 in the nucleotide sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 3 is alanine. Appropriate correction is required to overcome the rejection. Claim Interpretation (Modified) 12. The claims in this application are given their broadest reasonable interpretation using the plain meaning of the claim language in light of the specification as it would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Claim 1: The instant claim 1 is interpreted to be directed to a recombinant vaccinia virus, which comprises the whole or part of cDNA encoding nonstructural proteins or structural protein derived from SARS-CoV-2, and an expression promoter, wherein the cDNA encoding nonstructural protein is any of DNAs shown in (a) and (b) below: (a) DNA consisting of the nucleotide sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 3; and (b) DNA consisting of the nucleotide sequence that shares 80% or more identity with DNA consisting of the nucleotide sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 3 and encodes a nonstructural protein derived from SARS-CoV-2, wherein the DNA of (b) is a DNA in which the bases corresponding to the bases at positions 2445, 2448, 4998, 5001 and 6000 in the nucleotide sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 3 are cytosine, and the base corresponding to the base at position 2539 in the nucleotide sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 3 is alanine, wherein the cDNA encoding a structural protein is any of DNAs shown in (c) and (d) below: (c) DNA consisting of the nucleotide sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 7; and (d) DNA consisting of the nucleotide sequence that shares 80% or more identity with DNA consisting of the nucleotide sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 7 and encodes a structural protein derived from SARS-CoV-2, wherein the DNA of (d) is a DNA in which the bases corresponding to the bases at positions 99, 102, 2364, 2367, 3213, 3216, 3417 and 3420 in the nucleotide sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 5 are cytosine. It is interpreted that the applicant is intending to refer SEQ ID NO: 7 and not the SEQ ID NO:5. It is interpreted that part of cDNA encoding nonstructural proteins limitation (b) SEQ ID NO: 3 requires the recited 6 base mutations, and part of cDNA encoding structural proteins limitation (d) SEQ ID NO: 7 requires the recited 8 base mutations. Allowable Subject Matter 13. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Applicant’s amendment (filed on 02/18/2026) of the instant claim 1 reciting the mutations in SEQ ID NO: 3 DNA in which the bases corresponding to the bases at positions 2445, 2448, 4998, 5001 and 6000 in the nucleotide sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 3 are cytosine, and the base corresponding to the base at position 2539 in the nucleotide sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 3 is alanine, and SEQ ID NO: 7 DNA in which the bases corresponding to the bases at positions 99, 102, 2364, 2367, 3213, 3216, 3417 and 3420 are cytosine has overcome the prior art of record rejections (including ABSS sequence identity search of record) under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 35 U.S.C. 103 of the instant amended claim 1 and dependent claims 2-3, 5, and 7-17. Response to Arguments 14. Applicant’s arguments / remarks filed on 02/18/2026, with respect to rejections of claims 1, 5 and 8-11 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1), and claims 1-3, 5, and 7-11 under 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered in view of applicant’s amendment to the claim 1 filed on 02/18/2026 that also affected scope of the dependent claims 2-3, 5 and 7-11. The applicant’s arguments / remarks are persuasive in view of the claim 1 amendment and the examples 1-7 and results shown in specification and drawings Figures 18-24 regarding protective efficacy and induction of cellular and neutralizing antibody response to the immunization with the rDIS-S vaccine in cynomolgus monkeys. The prior art-based rejection of the claims under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1), and 35 U.S.C. 103 has been withdrawn. The newly added claims 12-17 being dependent on claim 1 are free of prior art. Thus amended claims 1-3, 5, and 7-17 are free of the prior art of record. Conclusion 15. No claim is allowed. 16. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). 17. A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMADHAN J JADHAO whose telephone number is (703)756-1223. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas J Visone can be reached at 571-270-0684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMADHAN JAISING JADHAO/Examiner, Art Unit 1672 /BENNETT M CELSA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1600
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 27, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Feb 18, 2026
Response Filed
May 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Jun 29, 2026
Interview Requested
Jul 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600750
METHODS FOR INACTIVATING AND STORING RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS
4y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12577279
INFLUENZA VIRUS VACCINES AND USES THEREOF
3y 11m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12516351
NOVEL AAV CAPSIDS AND COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME
4y 2m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12516352
NOVEL AAV CAPSIDS AND COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME
4y 2m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12496338
CAR for Treatment of HIV Infection
5y 7m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+45.8%)
3y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 50 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month