Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/019,429

ELECTRODE FOR SECONDARY BATTERY AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Feb 02, 2023
Priority
Nov 25, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0160316 +1 more
Examiner
DOUYETTE, KENNETH J
Art Unit
1725
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1245 granted / 1525 resolved
+16.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1565
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
86.2%
+46.2% vs TC avg
§102
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1525 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment Claims 1-5, 7-8 and 9-14 are pending in the application. Previous grounds of rejection have been maintained. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-5 and 7-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Imayado et al. (JP 2009/037894, see Machine Translation). Regarding claim 1, Imayado et al. discloses in Figs 1-13, an electrode (ref 10) for a secondary battery (Fig 8), the electrode (ref 10) comprising: an electrode current collector (ref 11); a first active material (ref 12) located on the electrode current collector (ref 11) to provide a coated portion (Fig 1); and an electrode tab (ref 13) located on a first surface (Fig 1, top) of the electrode current collector (ref 11), the electrode tab (ref 13) having at least one hole (“hole”, Fig 1 below) and an extension portion (“EP”, Fig 1 below) defining a portion (Fig 1) of the at least one hole (“hole”, Fig 1 below) and extending from (Fig 1) the electrode tab (ref 13), the extension portion (“EP”, Fig 1 below) being in contact with (Fig 1) the electrode current collector (ref 11), the collector further comprising a portion (ref 52) where no first active material is located (Figs 9-12) on the first surface of the electrode current collector (ref 50), wherein the electrode tab (ref 53) is located on (Figs 9-12) the uncoated portion (ref 52) where no first active material is located (Figs 9-12) while overlapping the portion (ref 52) where no first active material is located (Figs 9-12), and a length (Figs 9-12) of the portion (ref 52) where no first active material is located (Figs 9-12) is shorter than a length of the coated portion (depicted in Figs 9-12, coated portions at 51 are truncated in the figs, but extend to a whole electrode as depicted in the battery of Fig 8). PNG media_image1.png 224 570 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Imayado et al. discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above and also discloses the extension portion (“EP”, Fig 1 above) of the electrode tab (ref 13) is in contact with a side surface (at ref 15) of the electrode current collector (ref 11) exposed by the at least one hole (“hole”, Fig 1 above). Regarding claim 3, Imayado et al. discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above and also discloses the electrode tab (ref 13) is located on (Fig 1) the first active material layer (ref 12, top) while overlapping (Fig 1) the first active material layer (ref 12, top). Regarding claim 4, Imayado et al. discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above and also discloses the electrode current collector (ref 11) has the first surface (ref 11, top) on which the first active material layer (ref 12, top) is located and a second surface (ref 11, bottom) located opposite the first surface (ref 11, top), and the extension portion (“EP”, Fig 1 above) is bent (Fig 7d, 13 is bent over bottom 12) so as to overlap (Fig 7d) the second surface (ref 11, bottom) thereby forming an electrode tab fixing portion (Fig 7d, bent bottom part of 13). Regarding claim 5, Imayado et al. discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above and also discloses a second active material layer (ref 12, bottom) located on the second surface (ref 11, bottom) of the electrode current collector (ref 11), wherein the electrode tab fixing portion (Fig 7d, bent bottom part of 13) is in contact with (Fig 7d) the second active material layer (ref 12, bottom). Regarding claim 7, Imayado et al. discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above and also discloses the electrode current collector (refs 11, 50) has the first surface (top of refs 11, 50) on which the first active material layer (refs 12, 51) is located, and a second surface (bottom of refs 11, 50) located opposite the first surface (Figs 1, 9-12), and wherein the electrode tab (refs 13, 53) is in contact with (Figs 9-12) the first surface (top of refs 11, 50) of the electrode current collector (refs 11, 50) in the portion (ref 52) where no first active material is located (Figs 9-12). Regarding claim 8, Imayado et al. discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above and also discloses the extension portion (“EP”, Fig 1 above) of the electrode tab (ref 13) is bent (Fig 7d) so as to overlap the second surface (bottom ref 11) of the electrode current collector (ref 11), thereby forming an electrode tab fixing portion (Fig 7d, bent bottom part of 13). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 3/30/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicants argue Imayado does not disclose the length of the portion where no first action material is located is shorter than the length of the coated portion. Applicants further this argument by stating Imayado merely illustrates conventional art where the length of the uncoated portion is equal to or greater than the length of the coated portion, pointing to Fig 10 of Imayado as a representative example. However, as stated in the 12/29/25 office action with respect to dependent claim 9, Fig 10 depicts an active material + collector structure (refs 51, 50) that is truncated, as indicated by the wavy lines at “truncated” Fig 10 below. Thus, while the uncoated area (ref 52) appears at least equal to or greater than in length to the coated area (ref 51) in Fig 10 itself, this does not account for the truncated portions. Removing the truncation (wavy lines at “truncated”, Fig 10 below) results in making the coating longer in length than the uncoated area. Further, as also stated in the 12/29/25 office action with respect to dependent claim 9, Fig 8 depicts an entire structure of a battery, including, in this instance, a cylindrical shape, having a definite length. Ostensibly, the battery depicted in Fig 8 is not truncated, showing a full length (and width). One of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing would have interpreted Fig 10 of Imayado in light of Fig 8, applying its full length / dimensions to the battery of Fig 8, and interpreting the uncoated portion shorter / smaller than the coat portion (i.e. the coated portion extends the full dimensions of the battery of Fig 8). As such, this argument is not found persuasive. PNG media_image2.png 212 584 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 348 498 media_image3.png Greyscale Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KENNETH J DOUYETTE whose telephone number is (571)270-1212. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8A - 4P EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Basia Ridley can be reached at 571-272-1453. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KENNETH J DOUYETTE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 02, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §102
Dec 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 30, 2026
Response Filed
May 18, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683222
BATTERY MODULE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680422
METHOD FOR POWERING WITH A HYBRID BATTERY PACK SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676358
BATTERY MODULE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671109
BATTERY
4y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671077
ELECTRODE, USE THEREOF, BATTERY, AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING AN ELECTRODE
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.4%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1525 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month