Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/019,706

MANDREL FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY OF CYLINDRICAL SECONDARY BATTERY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 03, 2023
Examiner
NGUYEN, DONGHAI D
Art Unit
3729
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
LG Energy Solution, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
661 granted / 878 resolved
+5.3% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
899
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
46.6%
+6.6% vs TC avg
§102
33.0%
-7.0% vs TC avg
§112
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 878 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings Figure 1 should be designated by a legend such as --Prior Art-- because only that which is old is illustrated. See MPEP § 608.02(g). Corrected drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. The replacement sheet(s) should be labeled “Replacement Sheet” in the page header (as per 37 CFR 1.84(c)) so as not to obstruct any portion of the drawing figures. If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by JP20063022799 to Kyosuke et al. Regarding claim 1, Koyosuke et al disclose a mandrel (see Figs. 2-3) for manufacturing an electrode assembly (see Abstract), the mandrel comprising: a first mandrel member (6) having a semicircular cross-section and a predetermined length; and a second mandrel member (7) configured to define a cylindrical shape of the mandrel by being coupled to the first mandrel member while facing the first mandrel member, wherein a concave-convex part (of members 6 and 7, respectively) is provided on joint surfaces (a long joint surfaces) of the first and second mandrel members, and wherein the concave-convex part includes a protrusion (on member 7) and a groove (on member 6) formed in a longitudinal direction so as to engage with each other (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 2, Koyosuke et al disclose the first and second mandrel members are asymmetrically formed in the longitudinal direction (see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 3, Koyosuke et al disclose the joint surfaces (are flat or parallel as shown in Fig. 2) of the first and second mandrel members are inclined at an angle of 0 to 1° with respect to a center axis of the mandrel in the longitudinal direction. Regarding claim 4, Kyosuke et al disclose the mandrel having two members (6/7) having a concave-convex part is formed on the remaining joint surface joint surfaces except for a section in which an end of a stack constituting the electrode assembly (4/5) is interposed (see Fig. 2) Regarding claim 5, Koyosuke et al disclose the concave-convex part is provided in plurality (see Fig. 3). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 6-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kyosuke et al in view of KR20150037312 hereafter ‘312. Regarding claims 6-7, Kyosuke et al disclose the groove and protrusion are rounded except for having a quadrangular cross-section and a width and a height of the protrusion are 50% or less of a diameter of the mandrel. ‘312 teaches a mandrel having a quadrangular cross-section and a width and a height of the protrusion are 50% or less of a diameter of the mandrel (see Figs. 8-9) for fixing the laminated sheet together (see Abstract). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention Kyosoke et al by utilizing the grooves and protrusions of having a quadrangular cross-section and width and height dimensions as taught by ‘312 for securely clamping the electrode sheets together. Regarding claims 8-9, Kyosuke/’312 does not disclose the exact limitations of an edge of the protrusion is rounded by 0.01 to 0.5 mm; and two opposite surfaces in a width direction of the protrusion are inclined at an angle of 80 to 100° with respect to the corresponding joint surface. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to round an edge of the protrusion by 0.01 to 0.5 mm and form an inclined surface at an angle of 80 to 100° with respect to the corresponding joint surface, since it held been held that where the general condition of a claimed are disclose in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art, In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Prior art cited for their general teachings of a mandrel for forming a cylindrical winding electrode of a battery. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DONGHAI D NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-4566. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sunil K. Singh can be reached at 571-272-3460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DN/ /DONGHAI D NGUYEN/November 15, 2025 Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 03, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 09, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 09, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604395
INTERCONNECT SUBSTRATE AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592408
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588135
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING CIRCUIT BOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580462
METHOD FOR PRODUCING AN ELECTRICAL SHEET FOR AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12552062
Electrode Manufacturing Apparatus Including Electrode Alignment Unit and Electrode Assembly Manufacturing Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.4%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 878 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month