Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/019,901

Positioning Device, Work Vehicle, Positioning Method, And Positioning Program

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 06, 2023
Priority
Aug 21, 2020 — JP 2020-139843 +1 more
Examiner
MAKHDOOM, SAMARINA
Art Unit
3648
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Yanmar Holdings Co. Ltd.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
89 granted / 124 resolved
+19.8% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
62 currently pending
Career history
192
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
72.6%
+32.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 124 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment Applicant's submission filed on May 15, 2026 has been entered. Claims 1, 11, and 13 are amended. Claims 1-13 are pending this application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over McClure (US 20160154108 A1) in view of Kroeger et al (US 2019/0391276 A1) and SNIP [Knowledge Base 2016]. Regarding Claim 1, McClure discloses a positioning method comprising: performing first positioning for calculating a position of a moving object on the basis of a satellite signal received from a satellite [0015 for using DGNSS]; transmitting positioning information corresponding to the position of the moving object to a base station server that selects one base station from among a plurality of base stations on the basis of the position of the moving object [0015-0017 for master and secondary base stations for moving object (rover)]; acquiring, from the base station server, correction information generated based on a satellite signal received by the one base station from the satellite [0015-0016]; and performing second positioning for calculating the position of the moving object on the basis of the correction information, wherein when the second positioning of the moving object based on first correction information corresponding to a first base station that is the one base station becomes possible [0015-0018 for using new correction signals from secondary base station], the same positioning information as the positioning information obtained immediately before the second positioning of the moving object based on the first correction information becomes possible is transmitted to the base station server [0015-0018]. McClure fails to explicitly teach and the first correction information including latitude and longitude indicating the position of the first base station and time information is used regardless of an actual location of the moving object. Kroeger has a method comprises receiving an approximate location of a rover platform based on satellite signals for a Global Navigation Satellite System (abstract) and teaches and the first correction information including latitude and longitude indicating the position of the first base station and time information is used regardless of an actual location of the moving object [0052, and 0075 for using differential corrections with longitude and latitude]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the work vehicle position techniques, as disclosed by McClure, further including the correction calculations as taught by Kroeger for the purpose to produce differential corrections for that location (Kroeger, 0075). McClure fails to explicitly teach and when the second positioning of the moving object based on the first correction information corresponding to the first base station becomes impossible, point positioning information corresponding to the position of the moving object is calculated by the moving object and transmitted to the base station server. SNIP has a method for track of where the currently connected end users are located (page 1, 0013) and teaches and when the second positioning of the moving object based on the first correction information corresponding to the first base station becomes impossible, point positioning information corresponding to the position of the moving object is calculated by the moving object and transmitted to the base station server [0014-0016 for some NTRIP Clients reuse the original sentence each time and SNIP will automatically connect the user to the nearest data stream as the client positions moves and is updated]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the work vehicle position techniques, as disclosed by McClure, further including the GGA calculations as taught by SNIP for the purpose to automatically connect the user to the nearest data stream as the client positions moves [SNIP, 0016]. Regarding Claim 2, McClure discloses when the second positioning of the moving object based on the first correction information becomes possible [0018, 0037-0038], the first correction information generated based on a satellite signal received by the first base station from the satellite is acquired from the base station server, and the position of the moving object is calculated on the basis of the first correction information [0015-0018]. Regarding Claim 3, McClure discloses when the second positioning of the moving object based on the first correction information becomes possible, the first correction information is acquired from the base station server, and the position of the moving object is calculated on the basis of the first correction information in each case where [0015-0018]: the moving object is located in a place closer to the first base station than to a second base station [0018 for switching using hysteresis]; and the moving object is located in a place closer to the second base station than to the first base station [0018-0019]. Regarding Claim 4, McClure discloses when the second positioning of the moving object based on the first correction information becomes possible, the first correction information is acquired from the base station server [0015-0018], and the position of the moving object is calculated on the basis of the first correction information even in a case where the moving object moves to the place closer to the second base station from the place closer to the first base station [0015-0018 for switching using hysteresis]. Regarding Claim 5, McClure discloses when the second positioning of the moving object based on the first correction information becomes impossible [0039 for blocked (impossible) areas], the positioning information corresponding to the position of the moving object is transmitted to the base station server after the second positioning of the moving object based on the first correction information becomes impossible [0039-0040 for checking for an available corrector]. Regarding Claim 6, McClure discloses the moving object is a work vehicle that travels in a field located between the first base station and the second base station [0038-0041]; the field includes a first region closer to the first base station than an intermediate point between the first base station and the second base station and a second region closer to the second base station than the intermediate point [0040-0041]; and when the second positioning of the moving object based on the first correction information becomes possible, the position of the moving object is calculated based on the first correction information in each case where: the work vehicle travels in the first region [0039-0041]; and the work vehicle travels in the second region [0039-0041]. Regarding Claim 7, McClure discloses the moving object is a work vehicle that travels in a field located between the first base station and a second base station [0011, 0039-0041]; the field includes two divided regions divided at an intermediate point between the first base station and the second base station [0039 for subareas (divided regions)]; the positioning information corresponding to a first divided region having a larger area of the two divided regions is transmitted to the base station server [0038-0040]; the correction information generated based on a satellite signal received from the satellite by a base station closer to the first divided region between the first base station and the second base station is acquired [0033-0035]; and the position of the moving object is calculated based on the correction information [0037-0038]. Regarding Claim 8, McClure discloses when the second positioning of the moving object based on the correction information becomes possible, the position of the moving object is calculated based on the correction information in each case where [0015-0018]: the work vehicle travels in the first region [0015-0018]; and the work vehicle travels in the second region [0015-0018]. Regarding Claim 9, McClure discloses in a case where a distance between the moving object and the one base station is less than a predetermined distance, the second positioning of the moving object based on the correction information corresponding to the one base station becomes possible [0043-0044], and, in a case where the distance between the moving object and the one base station is equal to or more than the predetermined distance, the second positioning of the moving object based on the correction information corresponding to the one base station becomes impossible [0033, 0038-0039 for lost signals]. Regarding Claim 10, McClure discloses the positioning information includes at least longitude information, latitude information, and time information [0015-0017]; and when the second positioning of the moving object becomes possible, the same latitude information and longitude information as the longitude information and the latitude information obtained immediately before the second positioning of the moving object becomes possible are transmitted to the base station server [0016-0018]. Regarding Claim 11, McClure discloses a positioning device comprising: a first positioning processing unit that performs first positioning for calculating a position of a moving object on the basis of a satellite signal received from a satellite [0015 for using DGNSS]; a transmission processing unit that transmits positioning information corresponding to the position of the moving object calculated by the first positioning processing unit to a base station server that selects one base station from among a plurality of base stations on the basis of the position of the moving object calculated by the first positioning processing unit [0015 for master and secondary base stations for moving object (rover)]; an acquisition processing unit that acquires, from the base station server, correction information generated based on a satellite signal received by the one base station from the satellite [0015-0016]; and a second positioning processing unit that performs second positioning for calculating the position of the moving object on the basis of the correction information acquired by the acquisition processing unit, wherein when the second positioning of the moving object based on first correction information corresponding to a first base station that is the one base station becomes possible [0015-0017 for using new correction signals from secondary base station], the transmission processing unit transmits, to the base station server, the same positioning information as the positioning information obtained immediately before the second positioning of the moving object based on the first correction information becomes possible [0016-0018]. McClure fails to explicitly teach and the first correction information including latitude and longitude indicating the position of the first base station and time information is used regardless of an actual location of the moving object. Kroeger has a method comprises receiving an approximate location of a rover platform based on satellite signals for a Global Navigation Satellite System (abstract) and teaches and the first correction information including latitude and longitude indicating the position of the first base station and time information is used regardless of an actual location of the moving object [0052, and 0075 for using differential corrections with longitude and latitude]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the work vehicle position techniques, as disclosed by McClure, further including the correction calculations as taught by Kroeger for the purpose to produce differential corrections for that location (Kroeger, 0075). McClure fails to explicitly teach and when the second positioning of the moving object based on the first correction information corresponding to the first base station becomes impossible, point positioning information corresponding to the position of the moving object is calculated by the moving object and transmitted to the base station server. SNIP has a method for track of where the currently connected end users are located (page 1, 0013) and teaches and when the second positioning of the moving object based on the first correction information corresponding to the first base station becomes impossible, point positioning information corresponding to the position of the moving object is calculated by the moving object and transmitted to the base station server [0014-0016 for some NTRIP Clients reuse the original sentence each time and SNIP will automatically connect the user to the nearest data stream as the client positions moves and is updated]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the work vehicle position techniques, as disclosed by McClure, further including the GGA calculations as taught by SNIP for the purpose to automatically connect the user to the nearest data stream as the client positions moves [SNIP, 0016]. Regarding Claim 12, McClure discloses and a control device that performs traveling processing on the basis of position information calculated by the positioning device [0033-0034]. Regarding Claim 13, McClure discloses a non-transitory computer-readable medium for storing a positioning program for causing one or a plurality of processors to execute [0018]: performing first positioning for calculating a position of a moving object on the basis of a satellite signal received from a satellite [0015 for using DGNSS]; transmitting positioning information corresponding to the calculated position of the moving object to a base station server that selects one base station from among a plurality of base stations on the basis of the calculated position of the moving object [0015 for master and secondary base stations for moving object (rover)]; acquiring, from the base station server, correction information generated based on a satellite signal received by the one base station from the satellite [0015-0016]; and performing second positioning for calculating the position of the moving object on the basis of the correction information, wherein when the second positioning of the moving object based on first correction information corresponding to a first base station that is the one base station becomes possible [0015-0017 for using new correction signals from secondary base station], the same positioning information as the positioning information obtained immediately before the second positioning of the moving object based on the first correction information becomes possible is transmitted to the base station server [0016-0018]. McClure fails to explicitly teach and the first correction information including latitude and longitude indicating the position of the first base station and time information is used regardless of an actual location of the moving object. Kroeger has a method comprises receiving an approximate location of a rover platform based on satellite signals for a Global Navigation Satellite System (abstract) and teaches and the first correction information including latitude and longitude indicating the position of the first base station and time information is used regardless of an actual location of the moving object [0052, and 0075 for using differential corrections with longitude and latitude]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the work vehicle position techniques, as disclosed by McClure, further including the correction calculations as taught by Kroeger for the purpose to produce differential corrections for that location (Kroeger, 0075). McClure fails to explicitly teach and when the second positioning of the moving object based on the first correction information corresponding to the first base station becomes impossible, point positioning information corresponding to the position of the moving object is calculated by the moving object and transmitted to the base station server. SNIP has a method for track of where the currently connected end users are located (page 1, 0013) and teaches and when the second positioning of the moving object based on the first correction information corresponding to the first base station becomes impossible, point positioning information corresponding to the position of the moving object is calculated by the moving object and transmitted to the base station server [0014-0016 for some NTRIP Clients reuse the original sentence each time and SNIP will automatically connect the user to the nearest data stream as the client positions moves and is updated]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the applicant’s invention for modifying the work vehicle position techniques, as disclosed by McClure, further including the GGA calculations as taught by SNIP for the purpose to automatically connect the user to the nearest data stream as the client positions moves [SNIP, 0016]. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-13 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. On page 8, second paragraph of applicant’s arguments, applicant states that the prior art does not teach the claim amendments. The examiner thanks the applicant for the amendments to the independent claims. New reference SNIP teaches sending a new GGA sentence and having the caster re-evaluate and reconnect with the client [SNIP, 0016 for every time the NTRIP Client sends a new GGA sentence, SNIP performs an evaluation of the distances to the various mount Pts in the NEAR pool]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMARINA MAKHDOOM whose telephone number is (703)756-1044. The examiner can normally be reached Monday – Thursdays from 8:30 to 5:30 pm eastern time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Kelleher can be reached on 571-272-7753 The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMARINA MAKHDOOM/ Examiner, Art Unit 3648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 11 earlier events
Feb 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 07, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 15, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 15, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 06, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706392
Metamaterial System Endowing Object with Adjustable Radar Profile (Track One)
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704623
OBTAINING A LOCATION OF A REFERENCE USER EQUIPMENT FOR LOCATION DETERMINATION OF ONE OR MORE OTHER USER EQUIPMENTS
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704638
METHOD, APPARATUS, AND RELATED DEVICE FOR IDENTIFYING GNSS PSEUDOLITE DATA
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704644
ENHANCED POSITIONING OF DEVICES
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12681135
DUAL-POLARIZED MIMO RADAR
4y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.4%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 124 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month