Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/020,020

METHOD FOR OPERATING A FUEL CELL SYSTEM, AND FUEL CELL SYSTEM

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Feb 06, 2023
Priority
Aug 06, 2020 — DE 10 2020 209 946.4 +1 more
Examiner
CREPEAU, JONATHAN
Art Unit
1725
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
676 granted / 924 resolved
+8.2% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
954
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
72.1%
+32.1% vs TC avg
§102
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 924 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment This Office action addresses claims 1-8, 9 and 10. The claims are newly rejected under 35 USC 102 and 103, as necessitated by amendment. Accordingly, this action is made final. Claim Interpretation The limitation that the component is “directly connected” to the fuel cell via a power line is interpreted as there being no additional components in the line, in accordance with Applicant’s remarks of 12/16/25. Accordingly, for example, the contactor (switch) K1 of CN ‘857 is excluded by this language. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claims 1, 2, and 4-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CN 1790043. Regarding claims 1 and 4, the reference is directed to a fuel cell system and a method for operating. The system has a fuel cell stack (1) and a DC/DC converter (18), and the stack is supplied with a medium (water or air) via a component (water pump 15 and associated motor controller 22, or air blower 2 and associated motor controller 21) (Fig. 2). The pump and blower motor controllers are directly connected to the fuel cell stack via a power line, such that they are directly supplied with power via the fuel cell stack (Fig. 2). Regarding claim 1, the output of the fuel cell stack is converted by means of the converter into a voltage of a higher level system (battery 19 and central controller 20) and is made available to the higher level system (Fig. 2). During normal operation of the stack, the pump and blower are directly supplied with power from the fuel cell stack (on page 5 of the translation, it is stated that “the blower motor controller and the pump motor controller are directly connected to the positive and negative electrodes of the fuel cell and the positive and negative poles of the bidirectional DC/DC high voltage terminal. The blower and the water pump motor are DC brushless motors that are compatible with the output voltage of the fuel cell”). Regarding claims 2, 5 and 6, the converter (18) is a bidirectional converter and the component is connected to the converter via a power line so the component can be supplied with power via the converter. Regarding claim 2, during startup, the component is supplied with power via the converter (page 5 of translation). Regarding claim 7, the component supports the voltage level of the fuel cell stack (page 5 of translation). Regarding claim 8, the system comprises a control unit (20), and other controllers shown in Figure 2. Thus, the instant claims are anticipated. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 3, 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN ‘043. The reference is applied to claims 1, 2, and 4-8 for the reasons stated above. However, the reference does not expressly teach that the control unit is used for controlling the bidirectional operation of the converter as recited in claim 3, or that the medium supplied by the component is a fuel (hydrogen) as recited in claims 9 and 10. For purposes herein the term “fuel” is considered to be distinct from air or oxygen. However, the invention as a whole would have been obvious to one skilled in the art at the time of filing because it would have been routine practice to use the control unit of CN ‘043 to control the bidirectional operation of the converter. The central controller (20) is shown as providing control signals to units throughout the system in CN ‘043. It is known in the art to use controllers to control DC/DC converters, although this is not expressly shown in CN ‘043. However, such modification is obvious to the person skilled in the art operating the system of CN ‘043 when the DC/DC converter is operated or switched. Regarding the medium of the component being fuel (hydrogen), it is noted that CN ‘043 teaches that the direct connection is between components that are operable on the fuel cell stack voltage, that is, the air blower and the water pump. In Figure 2, it is shown that a hydrogen solenoid valve 8 is supplied with power at the voltage of battery 19, on the other side of the DC/DC converter. It would have been obvious to also provide the hydrogen supply component as being directly connected to the fuel cell, as with the air blower and water pump. A hydrogen supply component having a voltage matching the fuel cell could be wired in the same way as the other components, thereby simplifying the system. Accordingly, the limitation is rendered obvious. Conclusion The following reference is cited herein: CN 103010044, which teaches a fuel cell (11) and a component (air compressor 13), however, a diode (18) is present between the fuel cell and the component which is considered to be excluded by the claims. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jonathan Crepeau whose telephone number is (571) 272-1299. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday from 9:30 AM - 6:00 PM EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Nicole Buie-Hatcher, can be reached at (571) 270-3879. The phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 272-1700. Documents may be faxed to the central fax server at (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /Jonathan Crepeau/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1725 March 30, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 06, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Dec 16, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 18, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640386
ALL AQUEOUS THERMALLY-REGENERATIVE BATTERY
3y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633616
BATTERY PACK
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633540
NEGATIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12614742
PURGE SYSTEMS AND METHODS IN A FUEL CELL SYSTEM
3y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12614738
BIPOLAR PLATE FOR AN ELECTROCHEMICAL CELL, ARRANGEMENT OF ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS, AND METHOD FOR OPERATING AN ARRANGEMENT OF ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+18.1%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 924 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month