Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/021,217

DIGITALLY MONITORING OF COMPOSITE PRESSURE VESSEL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 14, 2023
Priority
Aug 20, 2020 — EU 20191898.4 +2 more
Examiner
MARONEY, JENNA M
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Hexagon Ragasco AS
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
338 granted / 524 resolved
-5.5% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
545
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
47.0%
+7.0% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 524 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment This Non-Final Office Action is in response to Applicant’s Remarks/Amendments filed on 23 June, 2026. The amendments have been entered. Disposition of Claims Claims 1-3, 5-10, 12-19 and 22 are pending. Claims 4, 11, and 20-21 have been cancelled. Claim Interpretation The claims remain interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) as set forth at pages 3-5 of the Final Office Action mailed on 18 September, 2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 6-8, 13-14, 16-17, and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LEASE (US 10,684,157 B2 – published 16 June, 2020), in view of DI SARNO (WO 2015/145468 A1 – published in English 1 October, 2015). As to claim 1, LEASE discloses a system for digitally monitoring (via 12; 59; col. 4, line 61 – col. 6, line 1; col. 6, line 43 – col.7, line 3) a pressure vessel (28; col.4, lines 5-26) for holding compressed gas, wherein the system comprises a sensor unit (sensors connected to send information within the system, such as those shown in figure 6, at 118, 176, 178, and 180, at least) placeable on the pressure vessel for gathering information (col.4, lines 27-33) regarding the condition of the pressure vessel, a communication unit (58; col. 11, line 9 – col. 12, line 18) for wirelessly communicating the gathered information to a receiver (46) wherein the sensor unit comprises: a temperature sensor (118; col.8, lines 13-19) for measuring the temperature of the pressure vessel, a gas pressure sensor (178; col.10, lines 33-39), at least one power unit (72 and/or 210; col. 5, lines 1-21; col.9, lines 20-26) for supplying power to the sensors and the communication unit, and wherein the system for digitally monitoring comprises a data management module (56) for storing (via, 194 and/or 196) and analyzing(via, 196) the information sent from the pressure vessel (col. 12, lines 62-67), based on this information, providing updated information on the conditions that the pressure vessel has experienced over time (col. 11, lines 21-28 and col. 12, lines 62-67). However, LEASE does not disclose wherein the pressure vessel is necessarily a composite pressure vessel. DI SARNO, however, is within the field of endeavor for pressure vessels (abstract). Furthermore, DI SARNO teaches wherein it is known to provide the material of the pressure vessel as a composite (abstract; par. 11, 15, 76, and 89). The selection of a known material based on its suitability for its intended use supported a prima facie obviousness determination in Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp., 325 U.S. 327, 65 USPQ 297 (1945). See MPEP § 2144.07. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill within the art, prior to the date the invention was effectively filed, to modify LEASE, in view of the known suitability of composite material forming the pressure vessel, as taught by DI SARNO. As to claim 2, LEASE, as modified, further discloses wherein the system further comprises a capacitive sensor for measuring the level of gas in liquid phase in the pressure vessel (15; col.15, line 50-62). As to claim 3, LEASE, as modified, further discloses wherein the capacitive sensor for measuring level of gas in liquid phase in the pressure vessel (15) is configured to give a warning if the pressure vessel is overfilled (MPEP §2111.04 – II; col.17, lines 47-56; col. 18, line 55-col.19, line 14). As to claim 6, LEASE, as modified, further discloses wherein the communication unit (58) is a short-range radio communication unit for communicating information gathered by the sensors to the receiver (col.11, line 9 – col.12, line 18). As to claim 7, LEASE, as modified, further discloses wherein the receiver is a mobile app (col.11, line 9 – col.12, line 18, in view of col.11, lines 59-64) or an IoT internet gateway (col.11, lines 29-44 and 59-64). As to claim 8, LEASE, as modified, further discloses wherein the power unit is an energy harvester chip (col.9, lines 20-26). As to claim 13, LEASE discloses a method for digitally monitoring (via 12; 59; col. 4, line 61 – col. 6, line 1; col. 6, line 43 – col.7, line 3) a pressure vessel (28; col.4, lines 5-26) for holding compressed gas, comprising a sensor unit (sensors connected to send information within the system, such as those shown in figure 6, at 118, 176, 178, and 180, at least) and a communication unit (58; col. 11, line 9 – col. 12, line 18) for wirelessly communicating the gathered information to a receiver (59) attached to the pressure vessel (figure 1 and 1A); wherein the sensor unit comprises a temperature sensor (118; col.8, lines 13-19) for measuring the temperature of the pressure vessel, a gas pressure sensor (178; col.10, lines 33-39), at least one power unit (72 and/or 210; col. 5, lines 1-21; col.9, lines 20-26) for supplying power to the sensors and the communication unit wherein the method comprises the following steps: supplying power from the power unit to the sensors (col. 5, lines 1-21; col.9, lines 20-26) measuring the temperature and the gas pressure (col.8, lines 13-19; col.10, lines 33-39), transmitting the measured and/or stored information with the communication unit to the receiver (col. 11, line 9 – col. 12, line 18), transmitting the information from the receiver to a user (col. 11, line 9 – col. 12, line 18, such as through readable information provided through the display sections); and storing(via, 194 and/or 196) and analyzing(via, 196) the information transmitted from the pressure vessel(col. 12, lines 62-67), and based on this information, providing updated information on the conditions at the pressure vessel has experienced over time to the user(col. 11, lines 21-28 and col. 12, lines 62-67). However, LEASE does not disclose wherein the pressure vessel is necessarily a composite pressure vessel. DI SARNO, however, is within the field of endeavor for pressure vessels (abstract). Furthermore, DI SARNO teaches wherein it is known to provide the material of the pressure vessel as a composite (abstract; par. 11, 15, 76, and 89). The selection of a known material based on its suitability for its intended use supported a prima facie obviousness determination in Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp., 325 U.S. 327, 65 USPQ 297 (1945). See MPEP § 2144.07. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill within the art, prior to the date the invention was effectively filed, to modify LEASE, in view of the known suitability of composite material forming the pressure vessel, as taught by DI SARNO. As to claim 14, LEASE, as modified, further discloses measuring of content either by measuring the amount using capacitance (col.17, lines 47-56; col. 18, line 55-col.19, line 14). As to claim 16, LEASE, as modified, further discloses wherein the communication unit uses communication protocol, capable of being Bluetooth communication protocol, for transmitting the information to the receiver (col. 11, line 9 – col. 12, line 18). As to claim 17, LEASE, as modified, further discloses wherein the receiver is an IoT gateway (col. 11, line 9 – col. 12, line 18) that can receive information from a plurality of the pressure vessels (claim 18-19, in view of user-selectable information from a plurality of different tanks being received at the display). As to claim 19, LEASE, as modified, further discloses temporarily storing the measured information in a flash memory on the pressure vessel (col. 13, lines 1-10; col. 14, lines 6-40). Claim(s) 5 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LEASE (US 10,684,157 B2 – published 16 June, 2020), in view of DI SARNO (WO 2015/145468 A1 – published in English 1 October, 2015)and CLARKE (US 2022/0136656 A1 – published 5 May, 2022). As to claim 5, LEASE, as modified, discloses wherein the sensor unit can control any number of sensors which can be used to measure different conditions of the tank, the vehicle, or system associated with the tank (col.10, lines 42-53). However, LEASE does not expressly disclose wherein the addition of any number of additional sensors includes a shock sensor for measuring shocks the pressure vessel has been subjected to int eh form of at least one capacitance pressure sensor. CLARKE, however, is within the field of endeavor provided a system for monitoring a vessel (100) containing fluid therein (abstract). CLARKE teaches wherein the sensor unit can include a number of pressure sensors, including a capacitance pressure sensor (par.95) which is capable of operating as a shock sensor for measuring shocks the vessel is subjected to (MPEP § 2114 – II). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill within the art, prior to the date the invention was effectively filed, to modify LEASE, in view of CLARKE to include where the additional number of sensors of the sensor unit includes a capacitance pressure sensor, operable to be a shock sensor, as claimed, to detect and monitor various parameters associated with the vessel (LEASE at col.10, lines 42-53 and CLARKE at par. 95). As to claim 18, LEASE, as modified, discloses wherein the sensor unit can control any number of sensors which can be used to measure different conditions of the tank, the vehicle, or system associated with the tank (col.10, lines 42-53). However, LEASE does not expressly disclose wherein the addition of any number of additional sensors includes a shock sensor for measuring shocks the pressure vessel has been subjected to. CLARKE, however, is within the field of endeavor provided a system for monitoring a vessel (100) containing fluid therein (abstract). CLARKE teaches wherein the sensor unit can include a shock sensor (par.95) which is operable to measure shocks the vessel is subjected to (par. 95). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill within the art, prior to the date the invention was effectively filed, to modify LEASE, in view of CLARKE to include where the additional number of sensors of the sensor unit includes a shock sensor, as claimed, to detect and monitor various parameters associated with the vessel (LEASE at col.10, lines 42-53 and CLARKE at par. 95). Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LEASE (US 10,684,157 B2 – published 16 June, 2020), in view of DI SARNO (WO 2015/145468 A1 – published in English 1 October, 2015)and KATO (US 2013/0166175 A1 – published 27 June, 2013). As to claim 9, LEASE, as modified, disclosed the gas pressure sensor (see rejection of claim 1) and further, discloses wherein the gas pressure sensor can be a capacitive sensor (col. 17, lines 26-36). However, LEASE does not expressly disclose wherein the gas pressure sensor is a capacitive double E sensor. KATO, however, is within the field of endeavor provided a system for monitoring a vessel containing fluid therein (abstract). KATO teaches wherein a known configuration of a sensor(10) to detect a parameter of the tank is in the form of a capacitive double E sensor (figure 1). This is strong evidence that modifying LEASE as claimed would was well within the ordinary capabilities of one skilled in the art and would produce predictable results to one skilled in the art, (i.e., providing a capacitive sensor of the configuration of a capacitive double E sensor for detecting a parameter of the tank). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed, to modify LEASE by KATO such that the capacitive sensor of the gas pressure sensor is particularly a capacitive double E sensor, since all claimed elements were known in the art, and one having ordinary skill in the art could have modified the prior art as claimed by known methods with no changes in their respective functions and the combination would have yielded the predictable result of providing a capacitive sensor of the configuration of a capacitive double E sensor for detecting a parameter of the tank. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LEASE (US 10,684,157 B2 – published 16 June, 2020), in view of DI SARNO (WO 2015/145468 A1 – published in English 1 October, 2015) and Iida (US 6,190,481 B1 – published 20 February, 2001). As to claim 10, LEASE, as modified, discloses the pressure vessel (28) including an outer casing (outer shell of the vessel, 28, shown in figures 1 and 1A) and the sensor unit can be placed in any position along the vessel, including along the outside of the outer casing (col. 4, line 27-3; col.8 line 36-39; col.8, lines 46-61; col.10, lines 33-39 and 42-67). In addition, the combination of teachings necessarily provides wherein it is suitable to form a pressure vessel of a composite material, to thereby be a composite pressure vessel (see rejection of claim 1). However, LEASE does not expressly disclose wherein the pressure vessel includes an inner liner and a layer of composite material, in addition to the outer casing. Iida, however, is within the field of endeavor provided a system for monitoring a vessel (1) containing fluid therein (col.1,lines 40-44). Iida teaches wherein the pressure vessel is a composite pressure vessel(in view of the materials provided within col. 3, line 65 – col.4, line 24) comprising an inner liner (2), a layer of composite material (E; col. 4, lines 57-59), and an outer casing (3). Particularly, Iida teaches wherein the inclusion of the pressure vessel, as structurally claimed, enables improving gas leakage (col.4, lines 25-27), in addition to a light weight vessel that is capable of maintaining internal pressure against repetitive impacts and excellent reliability (col.2, lines 13-17). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill within the art, prior to the date the invention was effectively filed, to modify LEASE, in view of Iida to include the additional structural requirements of the pressure vessel, as taught by Iida, for these reasons. Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LEASE (US 10,684,157 B2 – published 16 June, 2020), in view of DI SARNO (WO 2015/145468 A1 – published in English 1 October, 2015) and VILLARREAL (US 11,015,761 B1 – published 25 May, 2021). As to claim 12, LEASE, as modified, discloses the pressure vessel (28). However, LEASE does not expressly disclose wherein the pressure vessel is a liner free composite pressure vessel. VILLARREAL, however, is within the field of endeavor provided a system for monitoring a vessel containing fluid therein (abstract). VILLARREAL teaches wherein the pressure vessel is a liner free composite pressure vessel (col.2, lines 32-34). Particularly, VILLARREAL teaches wherein the liner-free composite pressure vessel is selected to provide an easily-manufactured vessel that is lighter in weight and smaller than previous vessels, while being able to maintain equivalent size and pressure ratings (col. 2, lines 5-10). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill within the art, prior to the date the invention was effectively filed, to modify LEASE, in view of VILLARREAL to include the structural and material requirements of the pressure vessel, as taught by VILLARREAL, for these reasons. Claim(s) 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LEASE (US 10,684,157 B2 – published 16 June, 2020), in view of DI SARNO (WO 2015/145468 A1 – published in English 1 October, 2015)and MATIKO (NPL: Matiko, Joseph W. Beeby, Stephen P.. (2017). Applications of Energy Harvesting Technologies in Buildings - Chapter 7 (pp. 157-198). Artech House. Retrieved from https://app.knovel.com/hotlink/pdf/id:kt012ZZFC4/applications-energy-harvesting/vibration--introduction). As to claim 15, LEASE, as modified, discloses wherein the power unit includes an energy harvester chip and supplying harvested energy to the power unit (col. 5, lines 1-21; col.9, lines 20-26). However, LEASE does not expressly distinguish that the energy harvester chip harvest energy from radio waves. MATIKO, however, teaches known concepts of energy harvesters. Particularly, MATIKO teaches that energy harvesters harvest energy from sources, such as vibrations (i.e., radio waves are a form of vibration), so as to convert the wasted or unused ambient kinetic energy in the environment into electrical energy that power devices, such as sensors (pg. 157 and 162-163). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill within the art, prior to the date the invention was effectively filed, to modify the energy harvester of LEASE to particularly harvest energy from radio waves, as taught by MATIKO, to provide electrical energy formed from wasted or unused vibrations (i.e., radio waves) for the purpose of powering devices. Claim(s) 22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LEASE (US 10,684,157 B2 – published 16 June, 2020), in view of DI SARNO (WO 2015/145468 A1 – published in English 1 October, 2015)and MARESCA JR. (US 5,950,487 – published 14 September, 1990). As to claim 22, LEASE, as modified, discloses the sensor unit, but does not expressly disclose wherein the sensor unit is in the form of a strip adapted to extend the vertical length of the pressure vessel. MARESCA JR., however, is within the field of endeavor provided a system for monitoring a vessel (20) containing fluid therein (abstract). MARESCA, JR. teaches a sensor unit (10), inclusive of multiple sensors (col.12, lines 3-8) which is in the form of a strip (figure 1A-2) adapted to extend relative to the vertical length of the vessel (figure 1A-2). MARESCA JR. teaches wherein the vertical orientation of the sensor unit, defined as a strip, enables position determination accuracy and reduction in reading errors of the sensors (col. 20,lines 17-23). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill within the art, prior to the date the invention was effectively filed, to modify LEASE, in view of MARESCA JR. to include the sensor unit in the form of a strip adapted to extend relative to the vertical length of the pressure vessel for the purpose of ensuring measurement accuracy by reducing reading errors of the sensor. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-3, 5-10 ,12-19, and 22 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JENNA M MARONEY whose telephone number is (571)272-8588. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7AM to 4PM, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Len Tran can be reached at (571) 272-1184. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JENNA M MARONEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763 8/28/2026 JENNA M. MARONEY Primary Examiner Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Feb 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 08, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 18, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 13, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 23, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747381
COMPACTED THERMOCHEMICAL HEAT STORAGE BODIES
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747911
HYDROGEN LIQUEFACTION SYSTEM AND HYDROGEN LIQUEFACTION METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743059
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FEEDBACK-BASED BEVERAGE SUPERCOOLING
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736281
METHOD FOR GENERATING REFRIGERATION FOR A CARBON MONOXIDE COLD BOX
6y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12723785
THERMOELECTRIC COUPLER FOR SELECTIVE HEAT TRANSFER BETWEEN COOLANT LOOPS IN A DEVICE COOLING SYSTEM
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+20.3%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 524 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month