DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Status of Claims
The claim set submitted on 12 JANUARY 2026 is acknowledged and considered. In the claim set, Claims 1, 3, 14, 26, 34 are ‘Currently Amended’; Claims 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 13, 17, 18, 20, 24, 25, 28, 30, 32 are ‘Original’ or ‘Previously Presented’; Claims 42-43 are ‘New’; Claims 7, 9-12, 15, 16, 19, 21-23, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35 and 37-41 are ‘Cancelled’; and Claim 36 is ‘Withdrawn’.
Current pending claims are Claims 1-6, 8, 13-14, 17-18 , 20 , 24-26, 28, 30, 32, 34 and 42-43 and are considered on the merits below.
Information Disclosure Statement
The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12 JANUARY 2026 was filed after the mailing date of the Non-Final Office Action on 16 OCTOBER 2025. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner.
The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 20 JANUARY 2026 was filed after the mailing date of the Non-Final Office Action on 16 OCTOBER 2025. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner.
Response to Amendment
Applicant’s arguments, see REMARKS, filed 12 JANUARY 2026, with respect to the 112(b) rejection and 112 (a) rejection have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 112(b) rejection and 112 (a) rejection has been withdrawn.
Applicant's arguments filed 12 JANUARY 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive.
In the newly added portion of Claim 1 “wherein movement of the manually-operated common actuating member from the first position to the second position acts on the mechanically powered driver to achieve transfer of at least part of the liquid sample from the first zone to the second zone, and wherein the mechanically powered driver effects the subsequent transfer of at least part of the liquid sample from the second zone to the third zone independently of the movement of the manually-operated common actuating member.” is directed to a manner of operating the device.
An “[A]pparatus claims cover what a device is, not what a device does.” Hewlett-Packard Co.v.Bausch & Lomb Inc., 909 F.2d 1464, 1469, 15 USPQ2d 1525, 1528 (Fed. Cir. 1990) . It should be noted that a claim containing a “recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus” if the prior art apparatus teaches all the structural limitations of the claim. Ex parte Masham, 2 USPQ2d 1647 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1987).
The rejection below has been modified to reflect the amendment to the claims.
The double patenting rejection has been maintained as “Applicant respectfully submits that neither the present application nor copending Application No. 18/02 1,198 have received an indication of allowable subject matter. Accordingly, it would be premature to file a terminal disclaimer since the subject matter recited in one or both cases is subject to amendment during prosecution.”
Double Patenting
The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969).
A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b).
The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13.
The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer.
Claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 14, 17, 34, 40 and 41 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 37, 39, 42, 49, 52, 55, 56 of copending Application No. 18/021,198 (reference application). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because both inventions are directed to a device for using in the analysis of a biomolecule which includes a plurality of zones, a transfer means, a flow control means and an actuating member. While the ‘198 reference is more broadly claimed, as it claims a plurality of zones, rather than specifically three zones and generically an actuating member rather than a manually operating actuating member, it would be obvious to modify ‘198 to suggest the three specific zones and a manually operating actuating member to specific and control movement and analysis throughout the device.
This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection because the patentably indistinct claims have not in fact been patented.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claims 1-6, 8, 13, 14, 17, 18, 20, 24-26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 40 and 42-43 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by CHEN, US Publication No. 2010/0304986 A1.
Applicant’s invention is directed towards a device.
Regarding Claim 1, the reference CHEN discloses a device for use in the analysis of a biomolecule in a liquid sample, Figure 24A, [0049, 0128], the device comprising:
at least three zones for accommodating at least part of the liquid sample, Figure 24 A, [0049, 0128];
a transfer means for transferring at least part of the liquid sample from a first zone to a second zone and for subsequently transferring at least part of the liquid sample from the second zone to a third zone along respective flow paths, [0128], a fluid reservoir, the piston depresses the membrane capping the reservoir, which in turn forces fluid out of the reservoir;
a mechanically powered driver for operating the transfer means, [0128], piston;
a flow control means for selectively opening the flow paths between the at least three zones, [0127], valves; and
a manually-operated common actuating member movable between a first and a second position to sequentially control both the mechanically powered driver and the flow control means to achieve transfer of at least part of the liquid sample between said zones, [0127], single actuator, the movement of the actuator moves fluids, open valves, introduces reagents into a sample mixes the sample and reagents, an transports the reaction products to a detector or analysis device, without the need for user intervention beyond activating the actuator.
Examiner Note: In the instant claim, in the newly added portion of “wherein movement of the manually-operated common actuating member from the first position to the second position acts on the mechanically powered driver to achieve transfer of at least part of the liquid sample from the first zone to the second zone, and wherein the mechanically powered driver effects the subsequent transfer of at least part of the liquid sample from the second zone to the third zone independently of the movement of the manually-operated common actuating member.” is directed to a manner of operating the device. “[A]pparatus claims cover what a device is, not what a device does.” Hewlett-Packard Co.v.Bausch & Lomb Inc., 909 F.2d 1464, 1469, 15 USPQ2d 1525, 1528 (Fed. Cir. 1990) . It should be noted that a claim containing a “recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus” if the prior art apparatus teaches all the structural limitations of the claim. Ex parte Masham, 2 USPQ2d 1647 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1987).
Additional Disclosures Included are: Claim 2: wherein the device according to claim 1, which is arranged and configured to effect the transfer of at least part of the liquid sample from the second zone to the third zone a predetermined time after the transfer of at least part of the liquid sample from the first zone to the second zone, [0124], movement governed by controller; sequence of reactions are to proceed for a specific period of time.; Claim 3: wherein the device according to claim 1, which further comprises a timed release mechanism which is actuated by the movement of the manually-operated common actuating member from the first position to the second position to effect the transfer of at least part of the liquid sample from the second zone to the third zone a predetermined time after the manually-operated common actuating member has moved to the second position from the first position, [0124], movement governed by controller; sequence of reactions are to proceed for a specific period of time, such control accomplished by controllers, gears, or even by spring-loaded mechanism.; Claim 4: wherein the device according to claim 1, in which the mechanically powered driver comprises a rotary member, [0119], Figure 19 and 20, camshaft of the embodiment is rotated.; Claim 5: wherein the device according to claim 4, in which the transfer means comprises a displacement member which is linearly movable, the rotary member being coupled to the transfer means by a linkage which converts rotational movement of the rotary member into linear movement of the displacement member, to cause one or more transfers between zones under the power of the drive means, [0119], Figure 19 and 20, several hinged members are positioned above several plunger, camshaft of the embodiment is rotated, actuated members in turn depress the plungers located below.; Claim 6: wherein the device according to claim 5, wherein the displacement member comprises at least one piston, Figure 24a, see right side of device.; Claim 8: wherein the device according to claim 1, wherein the mechanically powered driver comprises a mechanical energy store for storing mechanical energy for powering the driver, the mechanical energy store comprising at least one of a mechanical spring and a torsional spring, and wherein the mechanical energy store is preloaded with sufficient energy to cause movement of the displacement member along two, opposite linear strokes, [0124], spring-loaded mechanisms.; Claim 13: wherein the device according to claim 1, in which the at least three zones comprise a sample receiving means through which the sample is introduced into the device, a reaction chamber in which the sample undergoes one or more reactions specific to the analysis, and a test region for subsequently analysing the reacted sample, [0127]. ; Claim 14: wherein the device according to claim 13, wherein the sample receiving means comprises a sample receiving chamber, the device further comprising a cap or cover for closing the sample receiving chamber during the operation of the device, wherein the common actuating member comprises the cap or cover for closing the sample receiving chamber, [0127].; Claim 17: wherein the device according to claim 1, wherein the device includes a heater for heating at least part of the liquid sample in at least the second zone, [0125], heater.; Claim 18: wherein the device according to claim 17, wherein the heater is an electrically powered heater forming part of a printed circuit board (PCB), the PCB comprising control electronics for the device, [0124], computer control/controllers inherently have PCB.; Claim 20: wherein the device according to claim 17, wherein the heater is thermally coupled to a reaction chamber and the analysis includes the step of heating at least part of the liquid sample in the reaction chamber, wherein the reaction chamber comprises a metallic foil, wherein the device comprises a biasing means for urging the heater against the thermally conductive material, and wherein each of the heater and the thermally conductive material extend beyond the reaction chamber, [0125, 0136].; Claim 24: wherein the device according to claim 13, wherein the device includes a temperature sensor thermally coupled to the reaction chamber, [0125, 0126, 0132]; temperature is moderated by heater/cooler and controlled which would imply there is a sensor.; Claim 25: wherein the device according to claim 1, wherein the device includes retaining means for temporarily interrupting the operation of the mechanically powered driver so as to delay the completion of the operation of the transfer means for a period., [0107], eccentricities disposed along the camshaft, upon rotation of the camshaft, Figure 21.; Claim 26: wherein the device according to claim 25: wherein the retaining means comprises : a fusible retaining member for engaging, and acting as a stop to, the mechanically powered driver; and a heater for heating the fusible retaining member, causing the fusible retaining member to soften, melt, weaken or break, so as to release the driver therefrom after said period, [0107]; Claim 28: wherein the device according to claim 1, herein the manually-operated common actuating member is movable along a single actuating member stroke, the device being arranged for this single movement to cause the device to perform a predetermined sequence of operations to achieve said analysis of the sample, [0127], single actuator.; Claim 30: wherein the device according to claim 1, wherein the flow control means comprises a valve, wherein the valve comprises a rod linearly movable in a valve chamber to bring selective pairs of ports into fluid communication, so as to create said one or more flow paths, [0110].; Claim 32: wherein the device according to claim 13 wherein the device includes a detent that resists movement of the manually-operated common actuating member beyond a position part way along said stroke, at which position a flow path has been established by the flow control means between the sample receiving means and the reaction chamber and the operation of the transfer means to transfer the sample into the reaction chamber has been triggered, but before completion of the stroke at which position a flow path between the reaction chamber and the test region has been established by the flow control means, [0010, 0056, 0102, 0104]. ; Claim 34: wherein the device according to claim 1, wherein the device includes monitoring means for monitoring the operation of the device and providing a warning if incorrect operation is detected, [0124, 0127, 0130], wherein the monitoring means comprises a timer, and wherein the warning is provided by a LED, [0124], use of a computer for control includes timers and LED; Claim 40: wherein the device according to claim 1, wherein movement of the manually-operated common actuating member from the first position to the second position acts on the mechanically powered driver to achieve transfer of at least part of the liquid sample from the first zone to the second zone, [0127], the movement of the actuator moves fluids, opens valves, introduces reagents into a sample, mixes the sample and reagents, and transports the reaction products to a detector or analysis device, without the need for user intervention beyond activating the actuator.; and Claim 42: wherein the device according to claim 1, in which the transfer means comprises a transfer pump, [0087].; and Claim 43: wherein the device according to claim 4, further comprising a proximity sensor for detection the position of the rotary member, [0119].
Conclusion
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTINE T MUI whose telephone number is (571)270-3243. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 5:30 -15:30 EST.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, LYLE ALEXANDER can be reached at (571) 272-1254. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
CTM
/CHRISTINE T MUI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1797