Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/021,340

METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING SIGNAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND APPARATUS SUPPORTING SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 14, 2023
Examiner
WONG, WARNER
Art Unit
2469
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
936 granted / 1048 resolved
+31.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1089
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
§103
56.3%
+16.3% vs TC avg
§102
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1048 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The previous final Office Action has been vacated and is replaced by this instant Final Office Action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang (US 2023/0254811) in view of Manolakos (US 2023/0041767). Regarding claim 1, Wang describes a method performed by a user equipment (UE) in a wireless communication system (fig. 7, UE), the method comprising: receiving positioning reference signal (PRS) configuration information (fig. 7 #703 & para. 540, UE receives PRS configuration information from base station); and receiving one or more PRS-related information based on the PRS configuration information (fig. 7 #704, UE receives PRS activation signal after receiving the previous received configuration info for the UE to measure PRS – equals to UE receiving signal related to configuration inform in instant application, fig. 13 #1307), wherein based on reception of information on triggering an aperiodic PRS, the one or more PRSs are aperiodically received (para. 65, the PRSs are part of the trigger group), the PRSs received by UE to be measured & reported being aperiodic, para. 4 & 64). Wang fail to further explicitly describe: receiving one or more PRSs based on the PRS configuration information. Manolakos also describes control of aperiodic signals in positioning (para. 101, communication signals for aperiodic PRS), further describing: receiving one or more PRSs based on the PRS configuration information (fig. 11 steps 1102 & 1106 & para. 123, UE receiving PRS in step 1106 after receiving PRS configuration in step 1102, see also fig. 10 step 6 in view of step 3, or para. 195 or claim 1). It would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention to specify that the UE of Wang to receive PRSs based on receiving PRS configuration as in Manolakos. The motivation is that this implementation enhances signal efficiencies and reduces latencies vs. current wireless standards (Manolakos, para. 3). Regarding claim 2, Wang and Manolakos combined describe: wherein the PRS configuration information comprises: information on positioning frequency layers; information on a specific transmission and reception point (TRP) among a plurality of first TRPs; information on PRS resource sets of the specific TRP; and information on PRS resources of the specific TRP (Wang, para. 62, settings include 1+ frequency layers of a plurality of TRPs, where the network-side may activate only PRS resource set/PRS resource/frequency layer of [selected] one TRP); wherein the information on the PRS resource sets of the specific TRP and the information on the PRS resources of the specific TRP are included in a higher layer parameter for assistance data related to the specific TRP, and wherein the higher layer parameter further comprises information for configuring a triggering state of the aperiodic PRS (Wang para. 60-62, such activation (configuration) state may be indicated by high-layer signaling or protocol). Regarding claim 3, Wang and Manolakos combined describe: wherein the information on triggering the aperiodic PRS is received in downlink control information (DCI), and wherein the information on triggering the aperiodic PRS is related to the triggering state of the aperiodic PRS configured based on the information for configuring the triggering state of the aperiodic PRS (Manolakos fig. 12 & para. 134, wake up signal (information on triggering aperiodic PRS) is received in the DCI for transitioning to the DRX ON mode (state) for receiving the aperiodic PRS in step 1204 sub-step ‘c’). Regarding claim 5, Wang and Manolakos combined describe: wherein the specific TRP is a plurality of second TRPs included in the plurality of first TRPs, and wherein for each of the plurality of second TRPs, an offset for triggering the aperiodic PRS is configured in units of at least one of symbols or slots (Wang, para. 53, configuration information of the 3rd PRS group (plurality of second TRPs within the plurality of all [first] TRPs) includes: TRP time offset. Such time offset is a time domain parameter including: [time] slot offset, para. 69). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4 and 6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 7-10 are apparatus (UE) claims comprising transceiver & processor to execute the steps in method for UE claims 1-3 and 5 respectively. Hence, they are rejected under the same rationale. Claim 11 recites the UE configured to communicate with the network, which is already described in either prior art of Wang or Munier. Hence, it is rejected under the same rationale. Claim 12 is the method for base station claim comprising mirroring transmitting steps to that of method for UE claim 1 comprising such receiving steps. Hence, it is rejected under the same rationale. Claim 13 is a base station apparatus claim comprising transceiver and processor for executing the steps recited in method for base station claim 12. Hence, it is rejected under the same rationale. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Bao (US 2022/0053461) describing receive configuration of first/second PRS resources (steps 910 & 920) & receives first/second PRS resources (fig. 9, & step 940), and Guo (WO 2021/036508) serving cell sends, to the terminal device, positioning reference signal (PRS) configuration information of the serving cell and neighbor cells; the terminal device receives and measures PRSs of the serving cell and the neighbor cells, and reports measurement results to the serving cell; (abstract), (fig. 3 steps 302 & 305). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WARNER WONG whose telephone number is (571)272-8197. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7am - 3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ian Moore can be reached at 571-272-3085. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. WARNER WONG Primary Examiner Art Unit 2469 /WARNER WONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2469
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 02, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604223
TIME PERIOD CONFIGURATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION DEVICE,AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12581491
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION OF CONTROL CHANNEL IN A COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574840
FACILITATING CELL AND CARRIER SWITCH OFF FOR ENERGY AWARENESS IN ADVANCED COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568157
PACKET FORMAT ADJUSTMENT TECHNOLOGIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12568347
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION OF GROUPCAST AND BROADCAST DATA IN WIRELESS CELLULAR COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+6.3%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1048 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month