Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/021,447

Microbe-Aided Perfusion System for Metallic Nanoparticle Production

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 15, 2023
Examiner
MUTREJA, JYOTI NAGPAUL
Art Unit
1798
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Northeastern University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
740 granted / 913 resolved
+16.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
945
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
34.5%
-5.5% vs TC avg
§102
50.6%
+10.6% vs TC avg
§112
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 913 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-9 and 17-20 in the reply filed on 1/7/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9 and 17-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hirschel (WO 2010/048417). Regarding claim 1, Hirschel teaches a perfusion bioreactor comprising (i) an inlet stage (reservoir) comprising a liquid nutrient medium reservoir fluidically coupled to a pump (circulation pump), the pump fluidically coupled to a perfusion compartment (bioreactor); (ii) the perfusion compartment, comprising a holding compartment configured for receiving the nutrient medium from the inlet stage, the holding compartment configured for uniform distribution and transfer of the nutrient medium to a reaction compartment; the reaction compartment configured for formation of said nanoparticles by microbial cells, the reaction compartment comprising a reaction surface suitable for supporting microbial cells used to synthesize the nanoparticles; a collection compartment configured to collect nutrient medium containing the synthesized nanoparticles from the reaction compartment and transfer the medium and nanoparticles to a collection port; a first flow barrier (24 and 26) disposed between the holding compartment and the reaction compartment, wherein the first flow barrier is operative to uniformly disperse the nutrient medium prior to entry of the medium into the reaction compartment; and a second flow barrier (24 and 26) disposed between the reaction compartment and the collection compartment, wherein the second flow barrier is operative to retain the microbial cells in the reaction compartment and allow the nanoparticles to flow into the collection compartment. (iii) an outlet stage (reservoir) fluidically coupled to the collection port, the outlet stage operative to collect the nanoparticles and depleted nutrient medium from the collection port. (Refer to Figures 5D and 7B) PNG media_image1.png 633 771 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, the second flow barrier provides a suspension of nanoparticles to the collection compartment that is substantially free of the microbial cells. (Refer to page 14, Line 9-18 and page 23, Lines 15-20) Regarding claim 3, the second flow barrier provides a suspension of nanoparticles to the collection compartment that comprises less than 1% (weight/weight) microbial cells. (Refer to page 20, Lines 8-10) Regarding claim 4, the collection compartment comprises one or more filters (34). Regarding claim 5, the filter comprises pores having an average diameter of about 0.2 µm. (Refer to page 11, Line 9-15) Regarding claim 6, the perfusion bioreactor comprises a gas-permeable roof. (Refer to page 15, Line 6-8) Regarding claim 7, the reaction surface is removable. (Refer to Figure 4B) Regarding claim 7, the collection compartment has a triangular shape converging at an apex to the collection port. (Refer to Figure above) Regarding claim 8, the first flow barrier (24 and 26) provides a flow of the nutrient medium that is slower than the flow of the liquid medium from the inlet stage. (Refer to Figure 4C and 7B) Regarding claim 9, the first flow barrier (24 and 26) provides a flow of the nutrient medium that is slower than the flow of the liquid medium from the inlet stage. (Refer to Figure 7B) Regarding claim 17, a kit comprising the perfusion compartment of the perfusion bioreactor of claim 1, and instructions for use thereof. (Refer to claim 11) Regarding claim 18, one or more replacement reaction surfaces of the perfusion compartment. (Refer to page 11, Lines 8-15) Regarding claim 19, the inlet stage and/or outlet stage of the perfusion bioreactor. (Refer to Figure 7B) Regarding claim 20, one or more microbial cell cultures and/or one or more reagents for the production of metallic nanoparticles. (Refer to page 25, Lines 5-10) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JYOTI NAGPAUL whose telephone number is (571)272-1273. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am to 5pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles Capozzi can be reached at 571-270-3638. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JYOTI Mutreja/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1798
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 15, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596059
Automated Tissue Sectioning and Storage System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584827
FULL-AUTOMATIC PREPARATION METHOD OF CAST-OFF CELL SMEAR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578325
A staining method for live-cell imaging
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569595
BIOPROSTHETIC TISSUE PREPARATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570949
SYSTEMS AND DEVICES FOR WOUND THERAPY AND RELATED METHODS OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+3.7%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 913 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month