Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/021,997

SECONDARY BATTERY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 17, 2023
Priority
Aug 28, 2020 — JP 2020-144931 +1 more
Examiner
SON, TAEYOUNG
Art Unit
1751
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
40%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 40% of resolved cases
40%
Career Allowance Rate
12 granted / 30 resolved
-25.0% vs TC avg
Strong +41% interview lift
Without
With
+41.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
82
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
90.4%
+50.4% vs TC avg
§102
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 30 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 05/08/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 have been considered but are not found persuasive because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Takeshi teaches wherein a current collector is directly welded to a casing to improve internal resistance and high-current discharge capacity [0045-0046]. See rejection below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Okuda (US20210376391A1, IDS cited 11/11/2024, previously cited), in view of Takeshi (JP2001068145, translation attached, IDS cited 02/17/2023). Regarding claims 1,3,4, Okuda discloses a secondary battery (cylindrical secondary battery 1 in Fig 1, 2; [0014-0016, 0054]) comprising: a metallic case body (case body 5 in fig 2; [0014-0015, 0019, 0056]) having an opening; a sealing assembly (sealing assembly 6 [0014-0015, 0023, 0056] sealing the opening of the metallic case body; an electrode assembly (wound electrode assembly 3; [0014-0017, 0019, 0055]) housed in the metallic case body, the electrode assembly including a positive electrode (positive electrode 11 [0049]), a negative electrode (negative electrode 12 [0017-0019, 0036-0037, 0051]), and a separator (separator [0014, 0016, 0046]), the positive electrode and the negative electrode that are wound with the separator interposed between the positive electrode and the negative electrode (see Fig 2; [0055, 0016]), the negative electrode including a negative electrode current collector (negative electrode current collector 14 [0018, 0036, 0051]) and a negative electrode active material layer (negative electrode active material layer 16 [0018, 0037, 0051]) formed on the negative electrode current collector, the negative electrode having an exposed part (i.e., exposed portions 14a, 14b [0019]) in which the negative electrode active material layer is not formed and the negative electrode current collector is exposed (see Fig 2), the exposed part disposed at a winding end of the negative electrode ([0019, 0051]), Okuda further discloses wherein the electrode assembly has a stacked part in which metal foils formed from the exposed part which is wound (see Fig 2). Okuda further discloses wherein the length of the exposed portion 14b of the negative electrode current collector is not particularly limited, but is desirably a length one or more times around the outer periphery of the electrode assembly to obtain a good contact state with the case body so that the case body acts a negative electrode terminal [Okuda 0019]. Thus, it would have been obvious for a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have formed a stack part, wherein the exposed part is wound more than one turn in a direction from a winding end to a winding start of the electrode, with a reasonable expectation to obtain a good contact state with the case body so that the case body acts as a negative electrode terminal [Okuda 0019]. Such modification meets claim 3 requiring the exposed part to form “more than one turn” and claim 4 requiring “two or more turns” since Takeshi discloses wherein the exposed part is wound more than one turn. Okuda further discloses wherein the stacked part is in contact with the metallic case [0019], but does not disclose wherein the stacked part is welded to the metallic case. In this regard, Takeshi teaches an alkaline secondary battery comprising a negative electrode current collectors located in the outermost layer of the electrode that are spot-welded to the inner surface of the container [Takeshi 0045], wherein such spot-welding to contact the inner surface of the container reduces internal resistance and improves high-current discharge characteristics [Takeshi 0045-0046]. It would have been obvious for a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have modified Okuda such that the stacked part of the electrode assembly comprising the metal foils are directly welded to the inner surface of the metallic case body, with a reasonable expectation to reduce internal resistance and improve high-current discharge characteristics [Takeshi 0045-0046]. Regarding claim 2, modified Okuda discloses the secondary battery according to claim 1. Since Okuda discloses wherein the exposed portion 14b is disposed on an outermost periphery of the electrode assembly and that the length of the exposed portion 14b of the negative electrode current collector is desirably a length one or more times around the outer periphery of the electrode assembly (modified in claim 1 rejection; [0019-Okuda]), a person having ordinary skill in the art envisage “the stacked part to be disposed in an entire circumference of an outermost periphery of the electrode assembly”, as claimed. Regarding claim 5, modified Okuda discloses the secondary battery according to claim 2. Okuda does not disclose an embodiment wherein the stacked part is welded continuously over an entire circumference of a side surface of the metallic case body, as claimed. However, Takeshi teaches wherein the spot welding the inner surface of the container and the outer surface of the current collector reduces internal resistance and improves high-current discharge characteristics [Takeshi 0045-0046]. Thus, it would have been obvious for a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have spot welded over an entire circumference of a side surface of the metallic case body, with a reasonable expectation to further improve internal resistance and high-current discharge characteristics [Takeshi 0045-0046]. Regarding claim 6, modified Okuda discloses the secondary battery according to claim 1, wherein a thickness of the negative current collector (i.e., copper foil) is 8μm [Okuda 0051]. Since Okuda discloses wherein the exposed part is preferably wound one or more times around the outer periphery of the electrode assembly to obtain a good contact state with the case body, a person having ordinary skill in the art would envisage the thickness of the stacked part to be equal to or greater than 8 μm, which encompasses the claimed range of “20 μm or more and 200 μm or less”. It would have been obvious for a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have selected the encompassed thickness range, with a reasonable expectation to obtain a good contact state so that the case body so that the case body acts as a negative terminal [Okuda 0019]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TAEYOUNG SON whose telephone number is (703)756-1427. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Leong can be reached at (571) 270-1292. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /T.S./Examiner, Art Unit 1751 /Haroon S. Sheikh/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1751
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 17, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 19, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592415
Solid-liquid battery
4y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12548821
HIGH VOLTAGE BATTERY COMPONENT AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLING A HIGH-VOLTAGE BATTERY COMPONENT
3y 10m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12542332
BATTERY VENTILATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS
5y 1m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12525677
Battery Pack, Electronic Device, and Vehicle
3y 9m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12489180
LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
4y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
40%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+41.0%)
3y 7m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 30 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month