Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/022,100

CHARGE CONTROLLER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 17, 2023
Examiner
TSO, EDWARD H
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Isuzu Motors Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
1098 granted / 1260 resolved
+19.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1297
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.1%
-34.9% vs TC avg
§103
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§102
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1260 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The IDS filed 2/17/23 has been considered and placed of record. The initialed copy is attached herewith. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The disclosure should be carefully reviewed to ensure that any and all grammatical, idiomatic, and spelling or other minor errors are corrected. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 7 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Japanese document JP2011259672A (see machine translation). Re claim 1, the document discloses a charge controller having, inter alia, an environment prediction part that predicts, during charging of a battery mounted on a vehicle, a state of an external environment of the vehicle after an end of charging (To set a temperature of a power storage device at an appropriate temperature after the completion of charging by an external power source… Further, the higher the temperature TB and the outside air temperature, the longer the time required for cooling using the cooling fan 28 after completion of charging, and the lower the temperature TB and the outside temperature, the time required for cooling using the cooling fan 28 after completion of charging Becomes shorter); a target temperature setting part that sets a target temperature of the battery at the end of charging on the basis of the state of the external environment predicted by the environment prediction part (the required time calculation unit is the second temperature at which the temperature TB (or outside air temperature) is higher than the first temperature than the necessary time when the temperature TB (or outside air temperature) is the first temperature); and a temperature adjusting part that adjusts a temperature of the battery during the charge such that the temperature of the battery becomes the target temperature, set by the target temperature setting part, at the end of charging (the temperature of power storage device 16 is lower than the appropriate temperature range after charging by external power supply 30 is completed. The output of the power storage device 16 may be lower than when the temperature of the power storage device 16 is within a suitable temperature range. Further, when the temperature of the power storage device 16 is higher than the appropriate temperature range after the charging by the external power supply 30 is completed, it is necessary to operate the cooling fan 28 to cool the power storage device 16). Figure 4. Re claim 2, the document further discloses the environment prediction part predicts a change in an outside air temperature after the end of charging as the state of the external environment, and the target temperature setting part sets the target temperature on the basis of the change in the outside air temperature (when the temperature TB is TB (0) and the current outside air temperature is To (0) (point G shown in FIG. 4), “rapid charging” is performed. Executed. For example, when the temperature TB is TB (0) and the outside air temperature is To (1) (point H shown in FIG. 4), “normal charging” is executed. Alternatively, for example, when the temperature TB is TB (0) and the outside air temperature is To (2) (point I shown in FIG. 4), “slow charging” is executed – when outside temperature changes, the new temperature is set to secure type of charging). Re claim 3, the document further discloses the environment prediction part predicts a magnitude of the change in the outside air temperature after the end of charging, and the target temperature setting part sets the target temperature within a predetermined temperature zone according to the magnitude of the change in the outside air temperature. the environment prediction part predicts a magnitude of the change in the outside air temperature after the end of charging, and the target temperature setting part sets the target temperature within a predetermined temperature zone according to the magnitude of the change in the outside air temperature (the difference between the estimated temperature immediately after charging and the final target temperature. The target temperature is a temperature set in advance between a lower limit value TB (2) and an upper limit value TB (3) of an appropriate temperature range. The cooling time is determined based on, for example, a difference between the estimated temperature immediately after charging and the target temperature and a map. The map is a map showing the relationship between the estimated difference between the temperature immediately after charging and the target temperature and the cooling time). Re claim 7, the document further discloses the temperature adjusting part adjusts the temperature of the battery during the charge by performing heating and cooling of the battery during charging of the battery (the temperature of power storage device 16 is lower than the appropriate temperature range after charging by external power supply 30 is completed. The output of the power storage device 16 may be lower than when the temperature of the power storage device 16 is within a suitable temperature range. Further, when the temperature of the power storage device 16 is higher than the appropriate temperature range after the charging by the external power supply 30 is completed, it is necessary to operate the cooling fan 28 to cool the power storage device 16). Re claim 8, the document further discloses a temperature detection part that detects the temperature of the battery during the charge, wherein the temperature adjusting part adjusts the temperature of the battery during the charge such that the temperature detected by the temperature detection part at the end of charging becomes the target temperature (and charging the power storage device so that the temperature of the power storage device is within a predetermined range at the charging end time and the remaining capacity of the power storage device becomes a remaining capacity corresponding to the fully charged state). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Japanese document JP2011259672A (see machine translation). The document is silent on setting the target temperature lower than the predetermined value/zone when a prediction that the temperature would rise at end of charging or vice versa. Official notice is taken of the fact that lowering the temperature when knowing the operational temperature rises or raising the temperature knowing the operational temperature falls in order to reach a target temperature. It would have been obvious to have lowered or raised the temperature if predicting operating temperature would rise or fall at end of charging respectively to achieve the desired set temperature. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 6 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The art of record fails to disclose or suggest, at least, a storage that stores environment information indicating a state of past external environment, and the environment prediction part predicts a state of an external environment after an end of charging on the basis of the environment information stored in the storage. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Art made of record exemplified temperature control in EVs. Any inquiry concerning this communication should be directed to the Examiner at the below-listed number. The Examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Thu from 7:00am-5:00pm. The Examiner’s SPE is Taelor Kim and he can be reached at 571.270.7166. The fax number for the organization where this application is assigned is 571.273.8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866.217.9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800.786.9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571.272.1000. /EDWARD TSO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859 571.272.2087
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 17, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603523
ELECTRONIC CHARGING SHELF SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597782
CHARGER INCLUDING MULTIPLE ADJUSTABLE POWER SOURCES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597787
DATA LINE AND CHARGING DEVICE WITH SWITCHABLE CONFIGURATION CHANNEL CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587022
A BATTERY STORAGE SYSTEM WITH MULTI-LEVEL CONVERTER AND MULTIPLE STORAGE SECTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580418
GROUND ASSEMBLY FOR AN INDUCTIVE CHARGING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+6.1%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1260 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month