Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/023,785

THE FORMATION OF CATALYST PT NANODOTS BY PULSED/SEQUENTIAL CVD OR ATOMIC LAYER DEPOSITION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 28, 2023
Priority
Aug 31, 2020 — provisional 63/072,562 +1 more
Examiner
ZHANG, HAI Y
Art Unit
1732
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
L'Air Liquide, Société Anonyme pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
225 granted / 329 resolved
+3.4% vs TC avg
Strong +43% interview lift
Without
With
+42.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
352
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
46.7%
+6.7% vs TC avg
§102
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
§112
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 329 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election without traverse of electing Group I (claims 1-4, 7, 9-11, and 13-15) in the reply filed on January 13, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 16-17, 19-21, 23-25, and 27-29 were withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a canceled invention. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on January 23, 2020. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4, 7, 9-11, and 13-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, a broad range or limitation together with a narrow range or limitation that falls within the broad range or limitation (in the same claim) may be considered indefinite if the resulting claim does not clearly set forth the metes and bounds of the patent protection desired. See MPEP § 2173.05(c). In the present instance, claim 1 recites the broad recitation a catalyst support structure, and the claim also recites preferably a catalyst carbon support structure which is the narrower statement of the range/limitation. The claim(s) are considered indefinite because there is a question or doubt as to whether the feature introduced by such narrower language is (a) merely exemplary of the remainder of the claim, and therefore not required, or (b) a required feature of the claims. Regarding claim 9, the term “sufficient” is a relative term which render the claims indefinite. The term " sufficient " is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Regarding claims 10-11 and 13-15 recites the limitation "the catalyst carbon support structure". There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim because a catalyst carbon support structure is preferably not required. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HAI YAN ZHANG whose telephone number is (571)270-7181. The examiner can normally be reached on MTTHF. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DAH-WEI YUAN can be reached on 5712721295. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HAI Y ZHANG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1717
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698558
METHOD FOR THE SURFACE TREATMENT OF A JEWEL, IN PARTICULAR FOR THE WATCHMAKING INDUSTRY
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692586
HOT DIP ALLOY COATED STEEL MATERIAL HAVING EXCELLENT ANTI-CORROSION PROPERTIES AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAME
4y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692660
METHODS FOR PRODUCING OPTICAL EFFECT LAYERS COMPRISING MAGNETIC OR MAGNETIZABLE PIGMENT PARTICLES AND EXHIBITING ONE OR MORE INDICIA
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686755
CURE PROMOTER COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE SAME
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12661696
METHOD OF REMOVING CONTAMINANTS FROM A DIFFUSION-COATED COMPONENT
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+42.6%)
3y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 329 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month