Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/023,927

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VIRTUAL PANCREATOGRAPHY PIPEPLINE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Feb 28, 2023
Examiner
LUONG, PETER
Art Unit
3797
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
The Research Foundation For The Suny
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
501 granted / 727 resolved
-1.1% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
756
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§103
38.8%
-1.2% vs TC avg
§102
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§112
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 727 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1-3, 5-12, 14, and 20 are objected to because of the following informalities: claims 1, lines 6-7 and claim 20, lines 9-10 have grammatical errors such as “the the”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The scope of claim 20 is unclear. The claim recites a preamble without setting forth limitations of the claim body. The claim merely recites intended use of the computer arrangement. The claim fails to set forth the computer instructions or algorithm. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3, 5-12, and 14 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art of record fails to disclose or render obvious the claimed combination of subject matter of a method for virtual pancreatography comprising: receiving radiological images; receiving patient demographic data and patient clinical data; performing automatic segmentation of the radiological images to generate a pancreas segment, a duct segment, and a lesion segment; determining a pancreas centerline based on the pancreas segment; particularly, constructing a duct centerline based on the duct segment, wherein the duct segment includes a plurality of duct portions with associated duct portion centerlines and the constructing a duct centerline further comprises connecting the duct portion centerlines to determine a continuous duct centerline; particularly, performing automatic lesion classification based on the radiological images, the demographic and clinical data, the pancreas segment, the duct segment, the lesion segment, the pancreas centerline and the duct centerline to determine a lesion classification; and particularly, generating and displaying a three dimensional rendition based on the pancreas segment, the duct segment, and the lesion segment, the at least one of a pancreas centerline and duct centerline and lesion classification on a display device, the three dimensional rendition including a first navigation mode using the pancreas centerline and a second navigation mode using the duct centerline. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 9/24/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s amendment to claim 20 fails to overcome the 112 rejection. The claim merely recites a preamble without setting forth limitations of the claim body. The claim recites the preamble of “a non-transitory computer-accessible medium having stored thereon computer executable instructions” and the intended use “for a computer to perform procedures comprising: …”. The claim fails to set forth the computer executable instructions or algorithm. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER LUONG whose telephone number is (571)270-1609. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anhtuan T Nguyen can be reached at (571)272-4963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PETER LUONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3797
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2023
Application Filed
May 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 24, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Final Rejection — §112
Apr 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582383
ULTRASOUND IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND ULTRASOUND APPARATUS USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12551124
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEASURING CAPILLARY REFILL TIME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12544153
INDWELLING-TYPE MEDICAL DEVICE AND ENDOSCOPE SYSTEM USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12521185
VISUALIZING A QUALITY INDEX INDICATIVE OF ABLATION STABILITY AT ABLATION SITE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12521096
MEASURING METHOD FOR PERISTALSIS INFORMATION BASED ON ULTRASONIC SCANNING, MEASURING APPARATUS THEREOF AND MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+24.9%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 727 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month