Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/024,437

Lithium Secondary Battery and Manufacturing Method of the Same

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 09, 2023
Examiner
MCCONNELL, WYATT P
Art Unit
1727
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Lg Energy Solution, LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
829 granted / 1031 resolved
+15.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1054
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
44.7%
+4.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1031 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings It is noted that no drawings were filed with this application. Although drawings are typically filed, even where they are not necessary for understanding of an invention, they are not necessary when the subject matter to be patented can be understood without the assistance of drawings. MPEP 608.02. Here, because the claimed subject matter as a whole can be understood without the assistance of drawings, it is found that drawings are not necessary. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0251714 to Ryu (“Ryu”) . The applied reference has a common inventor with the instant application. Based upon the earlier effectively filed date of the reference, it constitutes prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). This rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) might be overcome by: (1) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(a) that the subject matter disclosed in the reference was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor of this application and is thus not prior art in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(A); (2) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(b) of a prior public disclosure under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) if the same invention is not being claimed; or (3) a statement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) establishing that, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, the subject matter disclosed in the reference and the claimed invention were either owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person or subject to a joint research agreement. Regarding claims 1 and 3, Ryu discloses a positive electrode and battery comprising the same. Ryu at paragraph [0040]. The battery incorporating the positive electrode further includes a negative electrode and separator. Id. at paragraph [0046]. The positive electrode includes a second positive electrode active material layer comprising a positive electrode active material, an electrolyte, and a plasticizer. Id. The plasticizer is preferably succinonitrile, and included in an amount ranging from 0.1 to 30% by weight relative to the positive electrode active material included in the second positive electrode active material layer with particular examples including 0.5% succinonitrile. Id. at paragraphs [0057], [0058] and [0105]. Finally, the electrolyte included in the second positive electrode active material layer may be a gel electrolyte. Id. at paragraph [0068]. Further regarding claim 2, an activation step is performed that allows the plasticizer to flow throughout the thickness of the second positive electrode active material layer, thereby distributing itself evenly throughout. Id. at paragraph [0080]. Further regarding claim 4, the positive electrode active material is preferably LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2. Id. at paragraph [0061]. Further regarding claim 5, the plasticizer is not included in the negative electrode. Further regarding claim 6, the separator includes common polymer electrolyte separators known to have a degree of porosity to facilitate ion transport. Id. at paragraphs [0084] and [0085]. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 7 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Ryu is silent regarding a phase angle of the gel electrolyte or any reason to control it. Claims 8-12 are allowed. Ryu includes its gel electrolyte as a material to be distributed throughout the positive electrode active material layer. The claimed method would not generate such a structure, thus would not be an obvious means for making the battery of Ryu. Inclusion of succinonitrile and propene sultone as a positive electrode additive was also known in systems that include a liquid electrolyte that impregnates a porous separator located between the positive and negative electrodes. However, in those systems the additive is present specifically to reduce or eliminate reaction between the positive electrode active material and the liquid electrolyte solvent. Thus, there would be no reason to replace the liquid electrolyte with a gel electrolyte in those systems since the purpose of those inventions is only related to a liquid electrolyte system. See U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2005/0238957 and 2018/0294483. Succinonitrile is also known for use as part of a positive electrode active material layer in a separator-free gel battery. Because that application is specifically for a separator-free battery, however, there would be no reason to modify the method of making the battery to comport with the claimed method that requires placement of a separator between the positive and negative electrodes. See e.g., U.S. Patent Application No. 2018/0123169 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WYATT P MCCONNELL whose telephone number is (571)270-7531. The examiner can normally be reached 9am to 5pm M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Barbara Gilliam can be reached at 571-272-1330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WYATT P MCCONNELL/Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 09, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 27, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603347
METHOD FOR DESIGNING BATTERY MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592380
BATTERY ELECTRODE COMPOSITION COMPRISING CARBON AND SILICON WITH SPECIFIC PROPERTIES FOR SUPERIOR PERFORMANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592413
NEGATIVE ELECTRODE FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586862
BATTERY PACK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586786
CORE-SHELL PARTICLE AND LITHIUM ION BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+10.1%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1031 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month