Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/024,584

SUBSTRATE HOLDING HAND AND SUBSTRATE CONVEYING ROBOT

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 03, 2023
Priority
Sep 03, 2020 — JP 2020-148491 +1 more
Examiner
LOIKITH, CATHERINE A
Art Unit
3674
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kawasaki Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
831 granted / 977 resolved
+33.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
995
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
73.1%
+33.1% vs TC avg
§102
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
§112
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 977 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 10 is objected to because of the following informalities: the claim recites “a first side and a second side” yet it is unclear what the sides are referring to. The claim would be clearer if it were amended to clarify the sides of what component are being claimed. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 7 recites the limitation "the intermediate blades" in page 48-49. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 10-12 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Somekh et al. (US 5,556,147) (“Somekh”). Referring to claims 1 and 14: Somekh teaches a substrate conveying robot comprising: a substrate holding hand; and an arm 16 to move the substrate holding hand; wherein the substrate holding hand includes: a frame (Figs. 1-3); a plurality of blades 18, 40 each to support a substrate 22; and a mounting member 84 to support the plurality of blades and mount the plurality of blades to the frame; wherein the plurality of blades are aligned in a direction perpendicular to main surfaces of the blades (Figs. 8-9); and among the plurality of blades, an intermediate blade 40 is removable from the mounting member while an end blade 18 located at an end in the direction perpendicular to the main surfaces of the blades is attached to the mounting member (column 6, lines 47-65; column 8, lines 16-35; column 9, lines 50-62). Referring to claim 10: Somekh teaches among the plurality of blades, the intermediate blade is removable from the mounting member while the end blade is attached to the mounting member on both of a first side and a second side in the direction perpendicular to the main surfaces of the blades (Figs. 10-12). Referring to claim 11: Somekh teaches the intermediate blade is adjacent to the end blade in the direction perpendicular to the main surfaces of the blades (Fig. 9). Referring to claim 12: Somekh teaches a substrate holding hand comprising: a frame (Figs. 1-3); a plurality of blades 18, 40 each to support a substrate 22; and a mounting member 84 to support the plurality of blades and mount the plurality of blades to the frame; wherein the plurality of blades are aligned in a direction perpendicular to main surfaces of the blades (Figs. 8-9); among the plurality of blades, an end blade 18 located at an end in the direction perpendicular to the main surfaces of the blades and a blade 40 adjacent to the end blade are removable from a same side in the direction perpendicular to the main surfaces of the blades (in the event of disassembly of the system); and the blade adjacent to the end blade is removable from the mounting member while the end blade is attached to the mounting member (column 6, lines 47-65; column 8, lines 16-35; column 9, lines 50-62). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-6, 8, 9 and 13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 7 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Somekh et al. (US 5,697,748) teaches a substrate conveying device comprising a removable blade 40. Carducci (US 6,132,165) also teaches a substrate conveying robot comprising multiple substrate-conveying blades (Fig. 2A). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CATHERINE A LOIKITH whose telephone number is (571)270-7822. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Doug Hutton can be reached at 571-272-4137. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Catherine Loikith/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3674 30 April 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 03, 2023
Application Filed
May 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637936
COMBINED GAS SEPARATION ASSEMBLY
2y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12618315
SLURRY PROPORTIONER SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618301
JOINT ASSEMBLY, PRODUCTION WELL MANUFACTURING METHOD, AND GAS PRODUCTION METHOD
1y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12607082
BI-DIRECTIONAL WELLHEAD ANNULUS PACKOFF WITH INTEGRAL SEAL AND HANGER LOCKDOWN RING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12607100
DOWNHOLE DEVICE FOR HYDROCARBON PRODUCING WELLS WITHOUT CONVENTIONAL TUBING
1y 11m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+7.6%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 977 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month