Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/025,728

Positive Electrode Active Material for Lithium Secondary Battery, Method for Preparing the Same and Lithium Secondary Battery Comprising the Same

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 10, 2023
Priority
Nov 10, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0149674 +1 more
Examiner
ARMSTRONG, KAREN JOYCE
Art Unit
1726
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
18 granted / 28 resolved
-0.7% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
89
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
95.3%
+55.3% vs TC avg
§102
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 28 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 11-16 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Group II, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 03/03/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et. al. (KR20190093453A, as cited in IDS dated 3/10/23, reference made to attached English translation) in view of Baek et. al. (WO2019088806 as previously cited, reference made to US20200083524 as English translation). Regarding claim 1, 3, and 6-10, Lee discloses a positive electrode active material for a lithium secondary battery of the formula Li(Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1)O2, comprising: secondary particles, wherein each secondary particle comprises an agglomerate of primary macro particles, wherein an average particle size (D50) of the primary macro particles is 2 μm and the crystallite size is 260 nm and an average particle size (D50) of the secondary particles is 6 μm (¶[0121]) but does not disclose wherein a part of a surface of each secondary particle is coated with a cobalt compound and an aluminum compound. Baek, related to positive electrode materials, teaches a lithium nickel cobalt manganese based oxide(¶[0071]) with a surface coating containing Co and Al(¶[0072]). One of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized adding the Co and Al coating layer to the positive electrode material of Lee would achieve suppression of the occurrence of a side reactions, thereby improving life characteristics when used in a battery (¶[0072]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to have added the coating layer of Baek to the positive electrode material of Lee to provide a system where the coating on the surface of the active material suppresses the occurrence of side reactions thereby improving life characteristics when used in a battery. Regarding claim 2, modified Lee teaches the positive electrode active material of claim 1 and Baek further teaches the Co and Al coating may be partially formed on the surface covering 5% up to <100% of the surface which one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize these sections of coverage as dots(¶[0074]). Regarding claim 4, modified Lee teaches the positive electrode active material of claim 1 and Baek further teaches the cobalt coating may be a oxide, hydroxide, oxyhydroxide(¶[0123]). Regarding claim 5, modified Lee teaches the positive electrode active material of claim 1 and Baek further teaches the aluminum coating component may be Al2O3, Al(OH)3(¶[0123]). Regarding claim 9, modified Lee teaches the positive electrode active material of claim 1 and Lee further teaches a positive electrode comprising the positive electrode active material of claim 1(¶[0145]). Regarding claim 10, modified Lee teaches the positive electrode active material of claim 1 and Lee further teaches a lithium secondary battery comprising the positive electrode active material of claim 1(¶[0147]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAREN J. ARMSTRONG whose telephone number is (703)756-1243. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10 am-6 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Barton can be reached at (571) 272-1307. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /K.J.A./Examiner, Art Unit 1726 /JEFFREY T BARTON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1726 14 April 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 10, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12658470
SOLID ELECTROLYTE MATERIAL AND BATTERY USING SAME
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658445
Binder for Secondary Battery, Negative Electrode for Secondary Battery Including the Same, and Lithium Secondary Battery Including the Same
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12646746
POSITIVE ELECTRODE LAYER, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING POSITIVE ELECTRODE LAYER, AND ALL SOLID-STATE BATTERY
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12646750
POSITIVE ELECTRODE LAYER, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING POSITIVE ELECTRODE LAYER, AND ALL SOLID-STATE BATTERY
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12620666
BATTERY MODULE MID PLANE CROSSMEMBER MOUNT
3y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+19.5%)
3y 5m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 28 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month