Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/026,747

GROUPING OF A PLURALITY OF COMMUNICATION DEVICES FOR ENERGY SAVING MODE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 16, 2023
Priority
Aug 10, 2022 — JP 2022-128396 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, TU X
Art Unit
2642
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Rakuten Mobile Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
767 granted / 903 resolved
+22.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
929
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
67.0%
+27.0% vs TC avg
§102
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§112
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 903 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1 and 20-21 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Applicant argues that Yu fails to disclose the energy saving information received from a first communication device, among the plurality of communication devices, indicates which of a plurality of energy saving modes are supported and configurable in the first communication device to reduce energy use of the first communication device. The Examiner disagrees. Yu discloses “The UE may report……capability……X1 means……the time domain position and periodicity …….PCI are the same as those of the SSB of the serving cell…..X2 means…….PCI are different from those of the SSB correspond to the PCI reported as X1” (par.0125-0127). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-12, 16 and 18-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yi (US Pub. 2023/0354163) in view of Babaei (US Pub. 2023/0389120). Regarding claims 1 and 20, Yi discloses a communication control apparatus comprising at least one processor that performs: by an energy saving mode designation unit (par.0118-0121 “The base station may use various ….two TRPs having different PCIs may operate ……..and designate the SSB transmitted in either TRP1 or TRP 2”, “par.044 “the term unit means……..Functions provide within the components”), designating a common energy saving mode to be applied to a plurality of communication devices (par.0198 “to transmit the SSB in the group common DCI broadcast and having a network energy saving-radio network temporary identifier”). Babaei discloses receiving from the plurality of communications device the energy saving information indicating energy saving modes supported by each of the plurality of communication devices (par.0305 “a wireless device may transmit/send a message…..a capability message….indicating……a cell that is a network energy saving cell”). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the system of Yi with the above teaching of Babaei in order to provide time-domain energy saving control. The modified Yi discloses the energy saving information received from a first communication device, among the plurality of communication devices, indicates which of a plurality of energy saving modes are supported and configurable in the first communication device to reduce energy use of the first communication device (Yi, par.0125-0127). Regarding claim 2, the modified Yi discloses the at least one processor performs: by an energy saving ID setting unit, setting a common energy saving ID for the plurality of communication devices; and by an energy saving information sharing unit, sharing at least one of the energy saving ID and the energy saving mode designation information with the plurality of communication devices (Yi, par.0198 “to transmit the SSB in the group common DCI broadcast and having a network energy saving-radio network temporary identifier….nes-RNTI”). Regarding claim 3, the modified Yi discloses a scrambling unit, applying scrambling based on the energy saving ID to the control information including the energy saving mode designation information, and wherein the energy saving information sharing unit shares at least one of the energy saving ID and the energy saving mode designation information, by having the plurality of communication devices descramble the control information (Yi, par.0198 “scrambled by the news-RNTI”). Regarding claim 4, the modified Yi discloses the energy saving ID is configured as a RNTI (Radio Network Temporary Identifier) temporarily assigned to the plurality of communication devices (Yi, par.0198 “to transmit the SSB in the group common DCI broadcast and having a network energy saving-radio network temporary identifier….nes-RNTI”). Regarding claim 5, the modified Yi discloses the control information is a DCI (Downlink Control Information) transmitted from a base station to the plurality of communication devices, and the energy saving mode designation unit designates the common energy saving mode to be applied to the plurality of communication devices based on the DCI format corresponding to the energy saving mode (Yi, par.0200 “the group common DCI 1103 having the network energy saving-radio network temporary identifier”). Regarding claim 6, the modified, Yi discloses SSB configuration information through common DCI (par.0198). Babaei discloses the one or more synchronization signals received at 4010, may indicate whether the cell is in a network energy saving state based on a discontinuous transmission DTX pattern….DRX pattern of the cell (Babei, par.0438). Regarding claim 7, the modified Yi discloses the time-domain energy saving control includes aligning the timings of discontinuous receptions of the plurality of communication devices (Babei, par.0438). Regarding claim 8, the modified Yi discloses the common energy saving mode involves frequency-domain energy saving control for the plurality of communication devices (Babei, par.097 “The number of subcarriers …..in the frequency domain”, par.098 “the width of the transmit and/or receive bandwidth may change…shrink during period of low activity to save power”). Regarding claim 9, the modified Yi discloses the frequency-domain energy saving control includes assigning a common BWP (Bandwidth Part) to the plurality of communication devices (Babei, par.098). Regarding claim 10, the modified Yi discloses the frequency-domain energy saving control includes at least one of simultaneous switching of PCells (Primary Cells) of the plurality of communication devices (consideration is optional), and simultaneous shutoff of SCells (Secondary Cells) of the plurality of communication devices, in carrier aggregation (Babaei, par.0104 “In carrier aggregation…..SCells may be deactivated…based on traffic and/or channel conditions”). Regarding claim 11, the modified Yi discloses the common energy saving mode involves space-domain energy saving control for the plurality of communication devices (Babei, par.0132 “spatial domain filter”). Regarding claim 12, the modified Yi discloses wherein the space-domain energy saving control includes stopping at least one of the plurality of beams that can be transmitted by a base station in at least one direction (Babaei, par.0132 “beam selection”). Regarding claim 16, the modified Yi discloses the common energy saving mode involves power-domain energy saving control for the plurality of communication devices (Yi, par.0198 “All the UEs in the serving mean all UEs in the serving cell supporting the energy saving mode”). Regarding claim 18, the modified Yi discloses a detailed information provision unit (Yi, “par.044 “the term unit means……..Functions provide within the components”), providing detailed information of the energy saving mode from a base station to the plurality of communication devices in advance through the RRC (Radio Resource Control) signal, and wherein the plurality of communication devices, which have acquired the energy saving mode designation information by descrambling the control information, acquire the detailed information of the energy saving mode from the detailed information provision unit (Yi, par.0108, 0198). Regarding claim 19, the modified Yi discloses the energy saving mode designation unit is provided on the network side that can communicate with a communication device, and designates the common energy saving mode after recognizing the common energy saving mode that can be commonly supported by the plurality of communication devices (Yi, par.044 “the term unit means……..Functions provide within the components”, par.0198). Regarding claim 21, the modified Yi discloses everything as claim 1 above. More specifically, Yi discloses a computer-readable medium storing a communication control program causing a computer to perform (Yi, par.045). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13-15 and 17 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Examiner Tu Nguyen whose telephone number is (571)272-7883. The examiner can normally be reached on 8AM-5PM Eastern Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at https://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor Rafael Perez-Gutierrez can be reached on 571-272-791515. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300 or mailed to: Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TU X NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Dec 12, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 31, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 23, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 25, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 25, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 30, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641545
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12628002
BEAM INDICATION METHOD, TERMINAL, NETWORK-SIDE DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12621039
CELL IDENTIFIER FOR PUCCH/PUSCH PATHLOSS REFERENCE OR BEAM REFERENCE SIGNAL
3y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12610321
AEROSPACE SYSTEM AND DEVICE FOR MITIGATING INTERFERENCE THROUGH DYNAMIC UPLINK POWER MODIFICATION
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12598551
USER EQUIPMENT, BASE STATION, AND METHODS THEREOF, READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+6.5%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 903 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month