Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 13, 2026
Application No. 18/028,100

6-METHOXY-2-PHENETHYL ISOINDOLINE-1-ONE DERIVATIVE AND COMPOSITION FOR TREATING NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS, COMPRISING SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 23, 2023
Priority
Sep 23, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0123295 +1 more
Examiner
CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S
Art Unit
1625
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Gachon University Of Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
1289 granted / 1774 resolved
+12.7% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
92 currently pending
Career history
1862
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
§102
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
§112
36.7%
-3.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1774 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions PNG media_image1.png 44 592 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 a)(1) as being anticipated by Haldar, Journal of Organic Chemistry (2013), 78(20),10192-10202 NPL in IDS 03/23/2023. PNG media_image2.png 195 460 media_image2.png Greyscale (formula 19 in claim 5) R1=alkoxy, R3=H; R2=H, R4=alkyl of instant base claim formula 22 Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Haldar, Journal of Organic Chemistry (2013), 78(20),10192-10202 NPL in IDS 03/23/2023; Lee, KR 2061526 Publication date 20200106 (KR priority 20181205) Cite No. 1 IDS 03/23/2023; Mun, Journal of Organic Chemistry (2017), 82(12), 6349-6357 and Shah, Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, October 2007; 22(5): 527–540. Note instant case KR filing date 09/23/2020 Haldar PNG media_image2.png 195 460 media_image2.png Greyscale (formula 19 in claim 5) R1=alkoxy, R3=H; R2=H, R4=alkyl of instant base claim formula 22, corresponds to claimed compounds of claims 1-4, 6-13. Lee at page 2 PNG media_image3.png 215 414 media_image3.png Greyscale R1=H, R3=hydroxyalkyl; R2=H, R4=alkyl lower homolog of formula 17 of claim 5 Also see page 3-4 for additional analogs. Lee teach pharmaceutically acceptable salt and pharmaceutical compositions food compositions or feed compositions comprising the same having the ability to promote nerve growth factor. As per MPEP 2144.09 Close Structural Similarity Between Chemical Compounds (Homologs, Analogues, Isomers) [R-01.2024]. Homologs (compounds differing regularly by the successive addition of the same chemical group, e.g., by -CH2- groups) are generally of sufficiently close structural and therefore obvious. Further consider the top two compounds of compounds of claim 5. The F in these represent F substitution for H in Mun’s compound in Scheme 2 at page 6350. In addition F substitution for H are routinely used in medicinal chemistry as per Shah at page column A page 527: “Fluorine substitution has been extensively investigated in drug research as a means of enhancing biological activity and increasing chemical or metabolic stability” Therefore nothing unobvious is seen in the claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NIZAL S CHANDRAKUMAR whose telephone number is (571)272-6202. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrew Kosar can be reached at (571) 272-0913. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NIZAL S CHANDRAKUMAR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1625
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 23, 2023
Application Filed
May 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698292
TOXIN MOLECULE SUITABLE FOR ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATE
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698263
PROCESS FOR PREPARING 3-AMINO-1-BUTANOL AND RELATED COMPOUNDS
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693297
COUMARIN-BASED CROSSLINKING REAGENTS
5y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12685738
INOTODIOL AS AGONIST OF LIVER X RECEPTORS, AND USE THEREOF
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12678466
Method to Improve Therapeutic Properties of Stem Cells
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+18.3%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1774 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month