Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/028,222

METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR STORING GENOMIC DATA IN A FILE STRUCTURE COMPRISING AN INFORMATION METADATA STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 24, 2023
Examiner
WU, TONY
Art Unit
2166
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N V
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allow Rate
108 granted / 209 resolved
-3.3% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
229
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
§103
68.6%
+28.6% vs TC avg
§102
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§112
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 209 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Response to Amendment The amendment filed on December 10, 2025 has been entered. Claims 1 and 12 have been amended, and claims 7, 8, 14 have been canceled. Claims 1-6, 9-13, 15 are currently pending in the application. Response to Arguments 35 U.S.C 103 Applicant’s arguments filed with respect to the rejection(s) of claims 1-15 under U.S.C 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However upon further consideration, new grounds of rejection are made in view of Shukla (U.S Pub # 20150213079). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5, 9-13, 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Text of ISO/IE CD 23092-6 Coding of Genomic Annotations (Motion Picture Expert Group or ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11) hereby to referred to as ISO that was submitted in an IDS filed on 03/23/2023 in view of Shukla (U.S Pub # 20150213079) and in further view of Cotton (U.S Pub # 20030187821). With regards to claim 1, ISO discloses a method for storing genomic data within a data structure comprising a file structure, the method comprising: receiving a genomic dataset comprising a plurality of fields or attributes of different data types ([Introduction, page 8 lines 4-8] genomic record including different data types); generating an information metadata structure for the genomic dataset, comprising one or more of: (i) information about an annotation table within the file structure, including one or more user profiles and associated profile permission; ([Section 7.3.2, Section 7.3.5, Page 33, Page 36] annotation__table_protection that describes access control policy enforcement for users) (ii) analytics information detailing a source dataset and one or more processing steps for producing the genomic dataset, wherein the analytics information is configured to facilitate verification of data reproducibility ([Section 7.3.2, Section 7.3.6, Page 33, Page 37]); (iv) linkage information defining a relationship between the annotation table and one or more data objects, wherein the linkage information is configured to enhance data navigation and/or to support a data query across linked data ([Section 7.3.2, Section 7.3.6, Page 33, Page 37]) annotation table indices consist of one or multiple indexing data structures that support query on the annotation data; compressing the genomic data, and the information metadata, using one or more compression algorithms to generate a compressed genomic dataset and compressed information metadata; and storing the compressed genomic dataset and the compressed information metadata in a container data structure ([Introduction Page 10, Section 8.4.4 Page 78 compressor parameter set] compress genomic sequencing and annotation table); wherein some or all of the annotation table is encrypted ([Section 7.3.5.2 Page 36] encryption). ISO does not disclose however Shukla discloses: wherein the one or more user profiles can be created by a user, encrypted for confidentially, signed for authenticity, and/or shared with another designated user ([0049] encrypt users omic data); (ii) analytics information detailing a source dataset and one or more processing steps for producing the genomic dataset ([0049] genomic analyses), wherein the analytics information comprises instructions for verification of data reproducibility by evaluating a concordance of the genomic dataset with an existing counterpart genomic data being verified ([0049] Genomic analyses for verifying data integrity and authenticating data provenance. An authentication server using the disclosed implementations can at once guarantee that both parties to the calculation are using genuine and un-tampered-with omic data, and that the authentication server itself cannot intentionally or unintentionally violate the privacy of either party. [0078] determining, by the first computing device, that the first verification output matches the first set of verification data); It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the date the current invention was effectively filed to have modified ISO by Shukla to use verification results to verify a genomic data set. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to maintain genetic information private from other people (Shukla [0003]). Cotton discloses: (iii) access history for the genomic dataset, configured to facilitate data traceability, wherein the verification of the data reproducibility includes verifying the authenticity and/or integrity of the access history ([0159] The traceability feature is particularly important for responding to the FDA, for example, or in any other report where the entity reported to requires a complete verification of the data gathered and its history from time of entry into the system. By selecting which artifact should be traced, (i.e., by selecting the unique identifier of the artifact to be traced) all events with have been generated, and hence, linked to that unique identifier are produced in chronological order, giving a complete history of who entered the data and when and as to how the data has been further developed, used, commented on, revised, etc. up to the time that the traceability report is produced). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the date the current invention was effectively filed to have modified ISO and Muse by the system of ISO to produce a traceability report. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to allow a scientific user to access, manage and analyze integrated scientific data from a variety of external and internal databases (Cotton [0012]). Claim 12 corresponds to claim 1 and is rejected accordingly. With regards to claim 2, ISO further discloses: further comprising the steps of: receiving new data for the annotation table; and updating the annotation table, comprising updating one or both of the information metadata and the genomic data ([Section 7.3.2 Page 30] annotation table). Claim 13 corresponds to claim 2 and is rejected accordingly. With regards to claim 3, ISO further discloses: wherein one or more of (i) through (iv) comprise selective encryption and a digital signature ([Section 7.3.5.2 Page 36] selective encryption and signature). With regards to claim 4, ISO further discloses: wherein the access history for the genomic dataset is configured to track access and/or change to the genomic data by one or more users, and wherein tracked access or changes are predefined ([Section 7.3.5.2 Page 36] privacy rules specify who can execute a given action and under which condition according to XACML). With regards to claim 5, ISO further discloses: ([Section 7.3.5.2 Page 36] privacy rules specify who can execute a given action and under which condition according to XACML). With regards to claim 9, ISO further discloses: with an optional digital signatures by a user that performed the verification ([Section 7.3.5.2 Page 36] selective encryption and signature). ISO does not disclose however Shukla discloses: wherein the analytics information further comprises one or more verification results ([0078] verification output). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the date the current invention was effectively filed to have modified ISO by Shukla to use verification results to verify a genomic data set. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to maintain genetic information private from other people (Shukla [0003]). With regards to claim 10, ISO further discloses: wherein the linkage information comprises one or more specifications for mapping data between one or more annotation tables ([Section 7.3.1 Page 32-33] linkage information). With regards to claim 11, ISO does not disclose however Newman discloses: verifying data reproducibility using the analytics information and ([0159] verification of the data gathered and its history). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the date the current invention was effectively filed to have modified ISO and Muse by the system of ISO to produce a traceability report. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to allow a scientific user to access, manage and analyze integrated scientific data from a variety of external and internal databases (Cotton [0012]). Claim 15 corresponds to claim 10 and is rejected accordingly. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Text of ISO/IE CD 23092-6 Coding of Genomic Annotations (Motion Picture Expert Group or ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11) in view of Shukla (U.S Pub # 20150213079) and in further view of Cotton (U.S Pub # 20030187821) and Adams (U.S Pub # 20140115515). With regards to claim 6, ISO does not disclose however Adams discloses: wherein the one or more user profiles comprise one or more parameters for presentation and/or further processing such as filtering, sorting, and/or highlighting of the genomic data ([0067] The display is user controllable in the sense that (depending on how the system is configured), the user may request one or more of the following in any combination: a change in expansion or detail, the imposition or removal of filters, highlighting or annotating a particular variant identified by the system or a gene region comprising one or more variations of interest, and permitting other system users to provide their own annotations directly on the display). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the date the current invention was effectively filed to have modified ISO, Shukla and Cotton by the system of Adams to allow a user to customize how they want to visualize genomic data. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to display variations between genomes between different individuals of the same species (Adams [0006]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TONY WU whose telephone number is (571)272-2033. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday (9-5). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sanjiv Shah can be reached at (571) 272-4098. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TONY WU/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2166
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 24, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 20, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 27, 2024
Response Filed
Dec 17, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Mar 20, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 27, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 10, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12585545
DYNAMIC ADJUSTMENTS OF BACKUP POLICIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12566674
SPLITTING IMAGE BACKUPS INTO MULTIPLE BACKUP COPIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12566766
Using Artificial Intelligence for Tagging Key Ingredients to Provide Recipe Recommendations
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12561382
AUTOMATICALLY RESTRUCTURING SEARCH CAMPAIGNS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12541430
GENERATING FILE-BLOCK CHANGE INFORMATION FOR A BACKUP
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+27.2%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 209 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month