Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/029,374

SARS-CoV-2 PROTEIN-DERIVED PEPTIDE AND VACCINE CONTAINING SAME

Non-Final OA §101§102§103§DP
Filed
Mar 29, 2023
Examiner
BOESEN, AGNIESZKA
Art Unit
1672
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Cancer Precision Medicine Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
555 granted / 816 resolved
+8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
847
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
§103
31.6%
-8.4% vs TC avg
§102
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
§112
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 816 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102 §103 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-4, 6 and 24 in the reply filed on January 9, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 13-15, 17, 19-23, 25, 27, and 29-31 are withdrawn as being drawn to non-elected invention. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on September 13, 2023, April 8, 2024, February 6, 2025, August 28, 2025, September 12, 2025 and November 14, 2025 have been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1, 4 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claimed invention is directed to a judicial exception (i.e., a law of nature, a natural phenomenon, or an abstract idea) without significantly more. The present claims are drawn to A peptide of less than 15 amino acids having cytotoxic T cell (CTL)-inducing ability, which comprises the amino acid sequence selected from the group below:(a) the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7,9,10, 11, 12, 13 and 15; and (b) the amino acid sequence in which one, two or several amino acids are substituted, deleted, inserted and/or added to the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15. The claims are interpreted to recite a Markush group with regard to a) and b), and are thus interpreted to not require both (a) and (b) but either (a) or (b). Thus, the claims are drawn to peptides of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7,9,10, 11, 12, 13 and 15. The claims do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because the claimed SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15 represent naturally occurring CTL peptide epitopes of SARS-CoV-2. Gaynor et al. (US Patent Application Publication US 2023/0083931) disclose SARS-CoV-2 peptides of less than 15 amino acids in length identical with present SEQ ID NO: 2 and SEQ ID NO: 3 (see sequence alignments below). Present SEQ ID NO: 2 and SEQ ID NO: 3408 in Gaynor et al. Query Match 100.0%; Score 50; Length 10; Best Local Similarity 100.0%; Matches 10; Conservative 0; Mismatches 0; Indels 0; Gaps 0; Qy 1 TAYANSVFNI 10 |||||||||| Db 1 TAYANSVFNI 10 Present SEQ ID NO: 3 and SEQ ID NO: 9052 in Gaynor et al. Query Match 100.0%; Score 53; Length 9; Best Local Similarity 100.0%; Matches 9; Conservative 0; Mismatches 0; Indels 0; Gaps 0; Qy 1 VFMSEAKCW 9 ||||||||| Db 1 VFMSEAKCW 9 DeGroot et al. (US Patent Application Publication US 2023/0190915) discloses SARC-CoV-2 CTL epitopes identical with present SEQ ID NO: 1 having the total length of 10 amino acids. Present SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 7221 in DeGroot Query Match 100.0%; Score 45; Length 10; Best Local Similarity 100.0%; Matches 9; Conservative 0; Mismatches 0; Indels 0; Gaps 0; Qy 1 AYANSVFNI 9 ||||||||| Db 1 AYANSVFNI 9 Csiszowszki et al. (US Patent 10,973,909) discloses SARC-CoV-2 CTL epitopes identical with present SEQ ID NO: 5 having the total length of 15 amino acids. Present SEQ ID NO: 5 and SEQ ID NO: 52 Query Match 100.0%; Score 54; Length 15; Best Local Similarity 100.0%; Matches 10; Conservative 0; Mismatches 0; Indels 0; Gaps 0; Qy 1 PFAMQMAYRF 10 |||||||||| Db 5 PFAMQMAYRF 14 Perera et al. (US Patent 11,414,700) discloses SARC-CoV-2 CTL epitopes identical with present SEQ ID NO: 15 having the total length of 15 amino acids. Present SEQ ID NO: 15 and SEQ ID NO: 18 Query Match 100.0%; Score 55; Length 15; Best Local Similarity 100.0%; Matches 10; Conservative 0; Mismatches 0; Indels 0; Gaps 0; Qy 1 YAYLRKHFSM 10 |||||||||| Db 3 YAYLRKHFSM 12 Thus, since the present claims fail to recite significantly more than the judicial exception, the claims are rejected as being drawn non-statutory subject matter. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 4, 6 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Gaynor et al. (US Patent Application Publication US 2023/0083931). The present claims are drawn to A peptide of less than 15 amino acids having cytotoxic T cell (CTL)-inducing ability, which comprises the amino acid sequence selected from the group below:(a) the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7,9,10, 11, 12, 13 and 15; and (b) the amino acid sequence in which one, two or several amino acids are substituted, deleted, inserted and/or added to the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2,3,4,5,7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15. The claims are interpreted to recite a Markush group with regard to a) and b), and are thus interpreted to not require both (a) and (b) but either (a) or (b). To require both (a) and (b) Applicant is suggested to recite: “which comprises the amino acid sequence comprising (a) and (b)”. Gaynor et al. disclose peptides of less than 15 amino acids in length identical with present SEQ ID NO: 2 and SEQ ID NO: 3 (see sequence alignments below). Regarding present claim 4. Gaynor et al. disclose an amino acid sequence consisting of a sequence identical with present SEQ ID NO: 2 and SEQ ID NO: 3. The sequences in Gaynor are 10 and 9 amino acids in length, respectively. Regarding present claim 24. Gaynor et al. disclose kits comprising CTL epitopes (see paragraph [1275]). Present SEQ ID NO: 2 and SEQ ID NO: 3408 in Gaynor et al. Query Match 100.0%; Score 50; Length 10; Best Local Similarity 100.0%; Matches 10; Conservative 0; Mismatches 0; Indels 0; Gaps 0; Qy 1 TAYANSVFNI 10 |||||||||| Db 1 TAYANSVFNI 10 Present SEQ ID NO: 3 and SEQ ID NO: 9052 in Gaynor et al. Query Match 100.0%; Score 53; Length 9; Best Local Similarity 100.0%; Matches 9; Conservative 0; Mismatches 0; Indels 0; Gaps 0; Qy 1 VFMSEAKCW 9 ||||||||| Db 1 VFMSEAKCW 9 Thus, by this disclosure Gaynor et al. anticipates the present claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-4, 6 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gaynor et al. (US Patent Application Publication US 2023/0083931) in view of Dionne et al. (Cancer Immunological Therapy, 2004, Vol. 53, p. 307-314). Gaynor et al. teach peptides of less than 15 amino acids in length identical with present SEQ ID NO: 2 and SEQ ID NO: 3 (see sequence alignment below). Present SEQ ID NO: 2 and SEQ ID NO: 3408 in Gaynor et al. Query Match 100.0%; Score 50; Length 10; Best Local Similarity 100.0%; Matches 10; Conservative 0; Mismatches 0; Indels 0; Gaps 0; Qy 1 TAYANSVFNI 10 |||||||||| Db 1 TAYANSVFNI 10 Present SEQ ID NO: 3 and SEQ ID NO: 9052 in Gaynor et al. Query Match 100.0%; Score 53; Length 9; Best Local Similarity 100.0%; Matches 9; Conservative 0; Mismatches 0; Indels 0; Gaps 0; Qy 1 VFMSEAKCW 9 ||||||||| Db 1 VFMSEAKCW 9 Regarding present claim 6. Gaynor et al. teach a composition comprising two peptides identical with present SEQ ID NO: 2 and SEQ ID NO: 3 (see sequence alignment below and Regarding present claim 24. Gaynor et al. disclose kits comprising CTL epitopes (see paragraph [1275]). Regarding present claims 1-3. Gaynor et al. does not teach (a) the second amino acid from the N terminus is substituted with an amino acid selected from the group consisting of phenylalanine, tyrosine, methionine and tryptophan; and (b) the C-terminal amino acid is substituted with an amino acid selected from the group consisting of phenylalanine, leucine, isoleucine, tryptophan and methionine or (a) the second amino acid from the N terminus is substituted with an amino acid selected from the group consisting of leucine and methionine and (b) the C-terminal amino acid is substituted with an amino acid selected from the group consisting of valine and leucine. Dionne et al., teach making amino acid substitutions within the anchor residues of the CTL epitopes, at the second position from the N terminus and at the C-terminal amino acid in order to make the CTL epitopes stronger peptide immunogens than the natural wild-type CTL epitopes (see Materials and Methods, Table 1 and Discussion). It would have been prima facie obvious to provide the Gaynor’s CTL peptide epitopes identical with present SEQ ID NO: 2 and SEQ ID NO: 3 and to introduce amino acid substitutions within Gaynor’s CTL peptide epitopes because Dionne et al., teach making amino acid substitutions within the anchor residues of the CTL epitopes, at the second position from the N terminus and at the C-terminal amino acid, in order to make the CTL epitopes stronger peptide immunogens than the natural wild-type CTL epitopes (see Materials and Methods, Table 1 and Discussion). One would have been motivated to modify the CTL epitopes of Gaynor as suggested by Dionne in order to strengthen the peptide’s affinity to the HLA-A molecules and thereby increase the peptides immunogenicity (see Dionne page 312 right column). Thus, the present invention would have been prima facie obvious at the time the invention was made. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 1-4, 6 and 24 are provisionally rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-5 of copending Application No. 18/270,590. This is a provisional statutory double patenting rejection since the claims directed to the same invention have not in fact been patented. The present claims are drawn to A peptide of less than 15 amino acids having cytotoxic T cell (CTL)-inducing ability, which comprises the amino acid sequence selected from the group below:(a) the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7,9,10, 11, 12, 13 and 15; and (b) the amino acid sequence in which one, two or several amino acids are substituted, deleted, inserted and/or added to the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2,3,4,5,7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15. Claim 1 of copending Application No. 18/270,590 is drawn to A peptide of less than 15 amino acids having cytotoxic T cell (CTL)-inducing ability, which comprises the amino acid sequence selected from the group below:(a) the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7,9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15; and (b) the amino acid sequence in which one, two or several amino acids are substituted, deleted, inserted and/or added to the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15. The present claims are drawn to the same invention as claims 1-5 of the copending application. Thus, the claims are provisionally rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention. Pertinent references DeGroot et al. (US Patent Application Publication US 2023/0190915) discloses SARC-CoV-2 CTL epitopes identical with present SEQ ID NO: 1 having the total length of 10 amino acids. Present SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 7221 in DeGroot Query Match 100.0%; Score 45; Length 10; Best Local Similarity 100.0%; Matches 9; Conservative 0; Mismatches 0; Indels 0; Gaps 0; Qy 1 AYANSVFNI 9 ||||||||| Db 1 AYANSVFNI 9 Csiszowszki et al. (US Patent 10,973,909) discloses SARC-CoV-2 CTL epitopes identical with present SEQ ID NO: 5 having the total length of 15 amino acids. Present SEQ ID NO: 5 and SEQ ID NO: 52 Query Match 100.0%; Score 54; Length 15; Best Local Similarity 100.0%; Matches 10; Conservative 0; Mismatches 0; Indels 0; Gaps 0; Qy 1 PFAMQMAYRF 10 |||||||||| Db 5 PFAMQMAYRF 14 Perera et al. (US Patent 11,414,700) discloses SARC-CoV-2 CTL epitopes identical with present SEQ ID NO: 15 having the total length of 15 amino acids. Present SEQ ID NO: 15 and SEQ ID NO: 18 Query Match 100.0%; Score 55; Length 15; Best Local Similarity 100.0%; Matches 10; Conservative 0; Mismatches 0; Indels 0; Gaps 0; Qy 1 YAYLRKHFSM 10 |||||||||| Db 3 YAYLRKHFSM 12 Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AGNIESZKA BOESEN whose telephone number is (571)272-8035. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:30 - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Visone can be reached on 571-270-0684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AGNIESZKA BOESEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 29, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599660
THERAPEUTIC RNA FOR HPV-POSITIVE CANCER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589143
HUMAN ANTI-PD-L1 PEPTIDE VACCINES AND METHODS OF THEIR USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12569553
SHINGLES VACCINES COMPRISING A TLR9 AGONIST
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12552854
PEPTIDES THAT BLOCK PRESENTATION OF ANTIGENIC ISLET PEPTIDES BY HLA-DQ8 AND METHODS FOR TREATING TYPE-1 DIABETES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12551550
COMPOSITIONS AND VACCINES FOR TREATING AND/OR PREVENTING CORONAVIRUS VARIANT INFECTIONS AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+22.5%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 816 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month