Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/029,392

METHODS, COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE EQUIPMENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 30, 2023
Priority
Oct 22, 2020 — EU 20203465.8 +1 more
Examiner
AYAD, SALMA ABDELMONEM
Art Unit
2462
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
43 granted / 54 resolved
+21.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
75
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
88.5%
+48.5% vs TC avg
§102
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 54 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 06/17/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed on 05/20/2026 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground of rejection is made in view of AWADIN et al. (US 20220377790 A1) to address the amended limitations. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2, 14-16 and 53 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over AWADIN et al. (US 20230035989 A1) in view of AWADIN et al. (US 20220377790 A1). Regarding claim 1, AWADIN discloses “A method of operating a communications device, the method comprising” (See [0005] Methods and apparatuses are described herein for transmission priority, collisions, and sharing in the COT by frame-based equipment (FBE)) “determining that the communications device can transmit data via one or more communications resources of an unlicensed channel of a wireless access interface” (See [0092] In mmWave, there is wide range of unlicensed spectrum that can be further utilized to attain higher data rate than attained by operating in sub 6 GHz frequency band. [0093] An FBE may comprise equipment where the transmit/receive structure has a periodic timing with a periodicity equal to the Fixed Frame Period (FFP). Initiating device comprises a device that initiates a sequence of one or more transmissions. Otherwise, the device is called Responding device. [0094] The initiating device may implement channel access mechanism as follows: [0095] A device may perform a Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) 53 check during a single observation slot. If the initiating device finds the operating channel(s) to be clear, it may transmit immediately), “the communications resources of the unlicensed channel being shared in time with at least one of an infrastructure equipment of a wireless communications network and one or more other communications devices which can also transmit in the communications resources of the unlicensed channel” (See [0099] procedures to enable the UE initiated COT to be shared with its gNB and possibly other UEs served by the same gNB are described herein to allow better utilization of the unused parts of the COT), “the transmission of the data by the communications device on the unlicensed channel being arranged in time according to a fixed frame period including a channel occupancy time for transmitting the data and an idle period” (See [0093] An FBE may comprise equipment where the transmit/receive structure has a periodic timing with a periodicity equal to the Fixed Frame Period (FFP). See Fig. 1, [0096] The COT 54 may not be greater than 95% of the Fixed Frame Period 51 and may be followed by an Idle period 55 until the start of the next Fixed Frame Period 51 such that the Idle Period 55 is at least 5% of the COT 54, with a minimum of 100 μs), “the determining that the communications device can transmit the data on the communications resources of the unlicensed channel including detecting that none of the infrastructure equipment and the one or more other communications devices are transmitting according to a clear channel assessment, CCA, phase associated with a channel occupancy time of a fixed frame period” (See [0094] The initiating device may implement channel access mechanism as follows: [0095] A device may perform a Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) 53 check during a single observation slot. If the initiating device finds the operating channel(s) to be clear, it may transmit immediately), “transmitting at least part of the data by the communications device in one or more of the communications resources of the channel occupancy time of the fixed frame period in the unlicensed channel” (See [0095] If the initiating device finds the operating channel(s) to be clear, it may transmit immediately. [0198] The initiating FBE device may not occupy the whole COT. In fact, it may occupy a small portion of COT, which as described above may be labeled as Tx window, especially if the initiating FBE device is a UE. Note: The device starts transmitting after determining the channel is clear, and it occupies a portion of the COT of the FFP to transmit at least part of its data), “and the method includes determining that one or more portions of the channel occupancy time of the fixed frame period are unused by the communications device by detecting that the data is less than a total capacity of the channel occupancy time; and releasing the one or more portions of the channel occupancy time unused by the communications device as a release device to at least one of the infrastructure equipment and the one or more other communications devices as a recipient device” (See [0096] An initiating device is allowed to grant an authorization to one or more associated responding devices to transmit on the current operating channel within the current COT 54. [0190] it may be beneficial that the UE, which starts its COT early to terminate the transmission and release the channel early (even before the end of its COT) to give a chance for other UEs to initiate their transmissions. For example, a UE may only use a particular portion of the COT which may be indicated by high layer signaling such as RRC or MAC-CE. Alternatively, the UE may only transmit in the first few UL occasions and then release the channel. [0195] Channel sharing and COT indication are described herein. It is beneficial that initiating device, e.g., either the gNB or UE, indicate that it successfully acquires the channel by transmitting an indicator, which it may be denoted by a CAI, such that other responding devices become aware of which nodes occupied the COT. The indication may carry information including: [0198] The duration of the actual transmission period: The initiating FBE device may not occupy the whole COT. In fact, it may occupy a small portion of COT, which as described above may be labeled as Tx window, especially if the initiating FBE device is a UE. Therefore, such information may allow other nodes to exploit the remaining portion of the COT. Note: The initiating device is the release device that releases the unused portion of the COT to the responding/ recipient devices to utilize. The initiating device only uses a portion of the COT to transmit at least part of its data and terminates the COT early, which implies that the initiating UE recognizes/ detects that the data to be transmitted is less than the total capacity of the COT, and accordingly releases the COT early). AWADIN does not explicitly disclose adopting a new fixed frame period upon receiving the released portions. However, AWADIN ’790 discloses “wherein releasing the one or more portions causes the recipient device to adopt a new fixed frame period for the recipient device upon receiving the released one or more portions” (See [0085] if a UE initiates a COT according to UE's FFP and if gNB share the UE initiated COT, then the gNB has to terminate the DL transmission according to the UE's FFP configurations. Therefore, the gNB may initiate its own COT according to its FFP configurations. Effectively, both the UE and the gNB occupy the channel, but each one occupies it according to the UE's and the gNB's FFP configuration, respectively). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of AWADIN with the teachings of AWADIN ‘790, and the motivation to do so would have been to increase flexibility in channel access by allowing operation under different FFP configurations. Regarding claim 2, AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 discloses “The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more portions of the channel occupancy time of the fixed frame period unused comprises a remaining portion of the channel occupancy time after the communications device has transmitted at least part of the data” (See AWADIN [0198] The initiating FBE device may not occupy the whole COT. In fact, it may occupy a small portion of COT, which as described above may be labeled as Tx window, especially if the initiating FBE device is a UE. Therefore, such information may allow other nodes to exploit the remaining portion of the COT), “and the method comprises transmitting, by the communications device, to one of the infrastructure equipment and one of the one or more other communications devices an indication that the infrastructure equipment or the other one of the one or more communications devices can transmit in the remaining portion of the channel occupancy time of the fixed frame period unused by the communications device” (See AWADIN [0096] An initiating device is allowed to grant an authorization to one or more associated responding devices to transmit on the current operating channel within the current COT 54. The Responding Device may perform transmissions on the current operating channel for the remaining COT 54 of the current Fixed Frame Period 51. [0190] it may be beneficial that the UE, which starts its COT early to terminate the transmission and release the channel early (even before the end of its COT) to give a chance for other UEs to initiate their transmissions. For example, a UE may only use a particular portion of the COT which may be indicated by high layer signaling such as RRC or MAC-CE. Alternatively, the UE may only transmit in the first few UL occasions and then release the channel. Note: The initiating device decides to release the remaining unused portion of the COT, and grants an authorization/ indication to the other devices to use the remaining portion for transmissions). Regarding claim 14, AWADIN discloses “A method of operating a communications device to communicate using a wireless communications network, the method comprising” (See [0005] Methods and apparatuses are described herein for transmission priority, collisions, and sharing in the COT by frame-based equipment (FBE)) “determining that the communications device can transmit data via one or more communications resources of an unlicensed channel of a wireless access interface” (See [0092] In mmWave, there is wide range of unlicensed spectrum that can be further utilized to attain higher data rate than attained by operating in sub 6 GHz frequency band. [0096] An initiating device is allowed to grant an authorization to one or more associated responding devices to transmit on the current operating channel within the current COT 54), “the communications resources of the unlicensed channel being shared in time with at least one of an infrastructure equipment of a wireless communications network and one or more other communications devices which can also transmit in the communications resources of the unlicensed channel” (See [0099] procedures to enable the UE initiated COT to be shared with its gNB and possibly other UEs served by the same gNB are described herein to allow better utilization of the unused parts of the COT), “the transmission of the data by the communications device on the unlicensed channel being arranged in time according to a fixed frame period including a channel occupancy time for transmitting the data and an idle period” (See [0093] An FBE may comprise equipment where the transmit/receive structure has a periodic timing with a periodicity equal to the Fixed Frame Period (FFP). See Fig. 1, [0096] The COT 54 may not be greater than 95% of the Fixed Frame Period 51 and may be followed by an Idle period 55 until the start of the next Fixed Frame Period 51 such that the Idle Period 55 is at least 5% of the COT 54, with a minimum of 100 μs), “and the determining that the communications device can transmit the data on the communications resources of the unlicensed channel comprises detecting that one of the infrastructure equipment and one of the one or more other communications devices, which has transmitted signals on the unlicensed channel in a channel occupancy time of a fixed frame period of the infrastructure equipment or the one other communications device has released one or more portions of the channel occupancy time of the fixed frame period which are unused by the infrastructure equipment or the one other communications device upon determination that the transmitted signals of the infrastructure equipment or the one other communications device is less than a total capacity of the channel occupancy time” (See [0096] An initiating device is allowed to grant an authorization to one or more associated responding devices to transmit on the current operating channel within the current COT 54. [0190] it may be beneficial that the UE, which starts its COT early to terminate the transmission and release the channel early (even before the end of its COT) to give a chance for other UEs to initiate their transmissions. For example, a UE may only use a particular portion of the COT which may be indicated by high layer signaling such as RRC or MAC-CE. Alternatively, the UE may only transmit in the first few UL occasions and then release the channel. [0195] Channel sharing and COT indication are described herein. It is beneficial that initiating device, e.g., either the gNB or UE, indicate that it successfully acquires the channel by transmitting an indicator, which it may be denoted by a CAI, such that other responding devices become aware of which nodes occupied the COT. The indication may carry information including: [0196] Parameters associated with frame periodicity (FFP), the length of the COT, the length of the idle window. [0198] The duration of the actual transmission period: The initiating FBE device may not occupy the whole COT. In fact, it may occupy a small portion of COT, which as described above may be labeled as Tx window, especially if the initiating FBE device is a UE. Therefore, such information may allow other nodes to exploit the remaining portion of the COT. Note: The receiving device has information about the actual transmission period and the length of the COT, which helps determine that the transmitted signals are less than a total capacity of the COT), “the infrastructure equipment or the one other communications device being a release device, and the communications device being a recipient device, and transmitting, by the communications device as the recipient device, at least part of the data in one or more of the released portions of the unlicensed channel from the channel occupancy time of the fixed frame period of the release device” (See [0096] An initiating device is allowed to grant an authorization to one or more associated responding devices to transmit on the current operating channel within the current COT 54. The Responding Device may perform transmissions on the current operating channel for the remaining COT 54 of the current Fixed Frame Period 51. Note: The initiating device is the release device that releases the unused portion of the COT to the responding/ recipient devices to utilize)). AWADIN does not explicitly disclose adopting a new fixed frame period upon receiving the released portions. However, AWADIN ’790 discloses “the recipient device adopting a new fixed frame period for the recipient device upon receiving the released one or more portions” (See [0085] if a UE initiates a COT according to UE's FFP and if gNB share the UE initiated COT, then the gNB has to terminate the DL transmission according to the UE's FFP configurations. Therefore, the gNB may initiate its own COT according to its FFP configurations. Effectively, both the UE and the gNB occupy the channel, but each one occupies it according to the UE's and the gNB's FFP configuration, respectively). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of AWADIN with the teachings of AWADIN ‘790, and the motivation to do so would have been to increase flexibility in channel access by allowing operation under different FFP configurations. Regarding claim 15, AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 discloses “The method of claim 14, wherein the transmitting, by the communications device as the recipient device, at least part of the data in the one or more released portions of the unlicensed channel from the channel occupancy time of the fixed frame period of the release device comprises transmitting at least part of the data by the communications device as the recipient device in the one or more communications resources of the unlicensed channel from a channel occupancy time of a fixed frame period of the communications device as the recipient device” (See AWADIN [0096] An initiating device is allowed to grant an authorization to one or more associated responding devices to transmit on the current operating channel within the current COT 54. The Responding Device may perform transmissions on the current operating channel for the remaining COT 54 of the current Fixed Frame Period 51. [0198] The initiating FBE device may not occupy the whole COT. In fact, it may occupy a small portion of COT, which as described above may be labeled as Tx window, especially if the initiating FBE device is a UE. Therefore, such information may allow other nodes to exploit the remaining portion of the COT. Note: The responding/ recipient device uses the remaining/ unused portion of the COT to transmit at least part of its data). Regarding claim 16, AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 discloses “The method of claim 14, wherein the transmitting, by the communications device as the recipient device, at least part of the data in the one or more released portions of the unlicensed channel comprises transmitting at least part of the data by the communications device as the recipient device in the one or more of the released portions according to the channel occupancy time of the fixed frame period of the release device” (See AWADIN [0096] An initiating device is allowed to grant an authorization to one or more associated responding devices to transmit on the current operating channel within the current COT 54. The Responding Device may perform transmissions on the current operating channel for the remaining COT 54 of the current Fixed Frame Period 51. [0198] The initiating FBE device may not occupy the whole COT. In fact, it may occupy a small portion of COT, which as described above may be labeled as Tx window, especially if the initiating FBE device is a UE. Therefore, such information may allow other nodes to exploit the remaining portion of the COT), “the fixed frame period of the release device including the channel occupancy time and an idle period” (See AWADIN [0093] An FBE may comprise equipment where the transmit/receive structure has a periodic timing with a periodicity equal to the Fixed Frame Period (FFP). See Fig. 1, [0096] The COT 54 may not be greater than 95% of the Fixed Frame Period 51 and may be followed by an Idle period 55 until the start of the next Fixed Frame Period 51 such that the Idle Period 55 is at least 5% of the COT 54, with a minimum of 100 μs). Regarding claim 53, AWADIN discloses “A communications device comprising transmitter circuitry configured to transmit signals via communications resources of an unlicensed channel of a wireless access interface, receiver circuitry configured to receive signals transmitted via the communications resources of the unlicensed channel, and controller circuitry configured to control the transmitter circuitry and the receiver circuitry” (See Fig. 36B, [0005] Methods and apparatuses are described herein for transmission priority, collisions, and sharing in the COT by frame-based equipment (FBE)). [0092] In mmWave, there is wide range of unlicensed spectrum that can be further utilized to attain higher data rate than attained by operating in sub 6 GHz frequency band) “the communications resources of the unlicensed channel being shared in time with at least one of an infrastructure equipment of a wireless communications network and one or more other communications devices which can also transmit in the communications resources of the unlicensed channel at different times” (See [0099] procedures to enable the UE initiated COT to be shared with its gNB and possibly other UEs served by the same gNB are described herein to allow better utilization of the unused parts of the COT), “the controller circuitry being configured with the receiver circuitry to determine that the transmitter circuitry can transmit data via one or more of the communications resources of the unlicensed channel according to a fixed frame period” (See [0093] An FBE may comprise equipment where the transmit/receive structure has a periodic timing with a periodicity equal to the Fixed Frame Period (FFP). Initiating device comprises a device that initiates a sequence of one or more transmissions. Otherwise, the device is called Responding device. [0094] The initiating device may implement channel access mechanism as follows: [0095] A device may perform a Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) 53 check during a single observation slot. If the initiating device finds the operating channel(s) to be clear, it may transmit immediately), “including a channel occupancy time for transmitting the data and an idle period” (See Fig. 1, [0096] The COT 54 may not be greater than 95% of the Fixed Frame Period 51 and may be followed by an Idle period 55 until the start of the next Fixed Frame Period 51 such that the Idle Period 55 is at least 5% of the COT 54, with a minimum of 100 μs), “by detecting that none of the infrastructure equipment and the one or more other communications devices are transmitting according to a clear channel assessment, CCA, phase associated with a channel occupancy time of a fixed frame period” (See [0094] The initiating device may implement channel access mechanism as follows: [0095] A device may perform a Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) 53 check during a single observation slot. If the initiating device finds the operating channel(s) to be clear, it may transmit immediately), “and to control the transmitter circuitry to transmit at least part of the data in one or more of the communications resources of the channel occupancy time of the fixed frame period in the unlicensed channel” (See [0095] If the initiating device finds the operating channel(s) to be clear, it may transmit immediately. [0198] The initiating FBE device may not occupy the whole COT. In fact, it may occupy a small portion of COT, which as described above may be labeled as Tx window, especially if the initiating FBE device is a UE. Note: The device starts transmitting after determining the channel is clear, and it occupies a portion of the COT of the FFP to transmit at least part of its data), “wherein the controller circuitry is configured to determine that one or more portions of the channel occupancy time of the fixed frame period are unused by the communications device by detecting that the data is less than a total capacity of the channel occupancy time, and to release the one or more portions of the channel occupancy time unused by the communications device as a release device, the one or more portions being released to at least one of the infrastructure equipment and the one or more other communications devices as a recipient device” (See [0096] An initiating device is allowed to grant an authorization to one or more associated responding devices to transmit on the current operating channel within the current COT 54. [0190] it may be beneficial that the UE, which starts its COT early to terminate the transmission and release the channel early (even before the end of its COT) to give a chance for other UEs to initiate their transmissions. For example, a UE may only use a particular portion of the COT which may be indicated by high layer signaling such as RRC or MAC-CE. Alternatively, the UE may only transmit in the first few UL occasions and then release the channel. [0195] Channel sharing and COT indication are described herein. It is beneficial that initiating device, e.g., either the gNB or UE, indicate that it successfully acquires the channel by transmitting an indicator, which it may be denoted by a CAI, such that other responding devices become aware of which nodes occupied the COT. The indication may carry information including: [0198] The duration of the actual transmission period: The initiating FBE device may not occupy the whole COT. In fact, it may occupy a small portion of COT, which as described above may be labeled as Tx window, especially if the initiating FBE device is a UE. Therefore, such information may allow other nodes to exploit the remaining portion of the COT. Note: The initiating device is the release device that releases the unused portion of the COT to the responding/ recipient devices to utilize. The initiating device only uses a portion of the COT to transmit at least part of its data and terminates the COT early, which implies that the initiating UE recognizes/ detects that the data to be transmitted is less than the total capacity of the COT, and accordingly releases the COT early). AWADIN does not explicitly disclose adopting a new fixed frame period upon receiving the released portions. However, AWADIN ’790 discloses “wherein releasing the one or more portions causes the recipient device to adopt a new fixed frame period for the recipient device upon receiving the released one or more portions” (See [0085] if a UE initiates a COT according to UE's FFP and if gNB share the UE initiated COT, then the gNB has to terminate the DL transmission according to the UE's FFP configurations. Therefore, the gNB may initiate its own COT according to its FFP configurations. Effectively, both the UE and the gNB occupy the channel, but each one occupies it according to the UE's and the gNB's FFP configuration, respectively). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of AWADIN with the teachings of AWADIN ‘790, and the motivation to do so would have been to increase flexibility in channel access by allowing operation under different FFP configurations. Claims 3, 5 and 7-8 and 11-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over AWADIN et al. (US 20230035989 A1) in view of AWADIN et al. (US 20220377790 A1), and further in view of Fakoorian et al. (US 20210176669 A1). Regarding claim 3, AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 discloses “The method of claim 1, wherein the releasing the one or more portions of the channel occupancy time unused by the communications device as a release device, releasing a portion of the channel occupancy time of the fixed frame period that unused by the communications device to the infrastructure equipment or the one of the other communications devices as the recipient device, the communications device transmitting at least part of the data before or after the portion released” (See AWADIN [0190] it may be beneficial that the UE, which starts its COT early to terminate the transmission and release the channel early (even before the end of its COT) to give a chance for other UEs to initiate their transmissions. For example, a UE may only use a particular portion of the COT which may be indicated by high layer signaling such as RRC or MAC-CE. Alternatively, the UE may only transmit in the first few UL occasions and then release the channel. [0198] The initiating FBE device may not occupy the whole COT. In fact, it may occupy a small portion of COT, which as described above may be labeled as Tx window, especially if the initiating FBE device is a UE. Therefore, such information may allow other nodes to exploit the remaining portion of the COT). AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 discloses that the release/ initiating device transmits at least part of its data before releasing the COT for the recipient/ responding devices to utilize the remaining portion, but does not explicitly disclose transmitting a release indication to the recipient devices. However, Fakoorian discloses “comprises transmitting by the communications device as the release device an indication that the communications device is releasing a portion of the channel occupancy time” (See [0064] the network 100 may operate over a shared channel, which may include shared frequency bands and/or unlicensed frequency bands. To avoid collisions, the BSs and the UEs may employ a listen-before-talk (LBT) procedure to monitor for transmission opportunities (TXOPs) in the shared channel. A TXOP may also be referred to as channel occupancy time (COT). [0067] a UE 115 may release an unused reserved resource to allow another sidelink UE 115 to reclaim the unused resources for sidelink transmissions. [0046] the inclusion of a resource release indication in SCI allows a sidelink UE to release an unused reserved sidelink resource and allows another sidelink UE to transmit in the resource that may otherwise by wasted). Note: AWADIN discloses that the unused resource is the remaining portion of the COT. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of AWADIN and AWADIN ‘790 with the teachings of Fakoorian to include a release indication of unused resources/ portion of the COT, and the motivation to do so would have been to improve resource utilization efficiency (Fakoorian [0046]). Regarding claim 5, AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 and Fakoorian discloses “The method of claim 3, wherein the portion of the channel occupancy time released is pre-configured using radio resource control signalling before the communications device transmits the data” (See AWADIN [0190] a UE may only use a particular portion of the COT which may be indicated by high layer signaling such as RRC or MAC-CE). Note: Since the used portion of the COT is indicated via RRC, it inherently the remaining portion of the COT, since the duration of the COT is known. Regarding claim 7, AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 discloses “The method of claim 1”, “releasing of the one or more portions of the channel occupancy time unused by the communications device as the release device to the recipient device” (See AWADIN [0190] it may be beneficial that the UE, which starts its COT early to terminate the transmission and release the channel early (even before the end of its COT) to give a chance for other UEs to initiate their transmissions. For example, a UE may only use a particular portion of the COT which may be indicated by high layer signaling such as RRC or MAC-CE. Alternatively, the UE may only transmit in the first few UL occasions and then release the channel. [0198] The initiating FBE device may not occupy the whole COT. In fact, it may occupy a small portion of COT, which as described above may be labeled as Tx window, especially if the initiating FBE device is a UE. Therefore, such information may allow other nodes to exploit the remaining portion of the COT). AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 discloses that the release/ initiating device transmits at least part of its data before releasing the COT for the recipient/ responding devices to utilize the remaining portion, but does not explicitly disclose transmitting a release signal indicating the releasing of unused portions of the COT. However, Fakoorian discloses “transmitting a release signal indicating the releasing of the one or more portions of the channel occupancy time unused by the communications device as the release device to the recipient device” (See [0064] the network 100 may operate over a shared channel, which may include shared frequency bands and/or unlicensed frequency bands. To avoid collisions, the BSs and the UEs may employ a listen-before-talk (LBT) procedure to monitor for transmission opportunities (TXOPs) in the shared channel. A TXOP may also be referred to as channel occupancy time (COT). [0067] a UE 115 may release an unused reserved resource to allow another sidelink UE 115 to reclaim the unused resources for sidelink transmissions. [0046] the inclusion of a resource release indication in SCI allows a sidelink UE to release an unused reserved sidelink resource and allows another sidelink UE to transmit in the resource that may otherwise by wasted). Note: AWADIN discloses that the unused resource is the remaining portion of the COT. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of AWADIN and AWADIN ‘790 with the teachings of Fakoorian to include a release indication of unused resources/ portion of the COT, and the motivation to do so would have been to improve resource utilization efficiency (Fakoorian [0046]). Regarding claim 8, AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 discloses “The method of claim 1”, but does not explicitly disclose transmitting a release signal indicating releasing the unused portion of the COT after transmitting the release signal. However, Fakoorian discloses “comprising transmitting a release signal indicating that the communications device as the release device is releasing the portion of the channel occupancy time unused by the communications device after the transmission of the release signal” (See [0064] the network 100 may operate over a shared channel, which may include shared frequency bands and/or unlicensed frequency bands. To avoid collisions, the BSs and the UEs may employ a listen-before-talk (LBT) procedure to monitor for transmission opportunities (TXOPs) in the shared channel. A TXOP may also be referred to as channel occupancy time (COT). [0067] a UE 115 may release an unused reserved resource to allow another sidelink UE 115 to reclaim the unused resources for sidelink transmissions. [0046] the inclusion of a resource release indication in SCI allows a sidelink UE to release an unused reserved sidelink resource and allows another sidelink UE to transmit in the resource that may otherwise by wasted). Note: AWADIN discloses that the unused resource is the remaining portion of the COT. Note: It is implied that the release device releases the unused resource/ unused portion of the COT, after transmitting the release signal since the release signal serves as an explicit indication the release device has relinquished its reservation and will no longer occupy the resource, allowing other devices to utilize the resource. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of AWADIN and AWADIN ‘790 with the teachings of Fakoorian to include a release indication of unused resources/ portion of the COT, and the motivation to do so would have been to improve resource utilization efficiency (Fakoorian [0046]). Regarding claim 11, AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 and Fakoorian discloses “The method of claim 7, wherein the release signal identifies one of the infrastructure equipment or one of the one or more other communications devices to which the one or more remaining shared communications resources are being released” (See Fakoorian, Fig. 7B, [0109] the SCI A 712 may indicate reserved resources per sidelink. For instance, the SCI A may indicate that the resource 706a is reserved for transmission by the UE 715a to the UE 715b, the resource 706b is reserved for transmission by the UE 715b to the UE 715a, and the resource 706c is reserved for transmission by the UE 715b to the UE 715c). Note: the SCI A transmitted by UE 715 a identifies for each reserved resource, the transmitting and receiving UEs, thereby indicating to which UE a resource is released. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of AWADIN and AWADIN ‘790 with the teachings of Fakoorian to include a release indication of unused resources/ portion of the COT, and the motivation to do so would have been to improve resource utilization efficiency (Fakoorian [0046]). Regarding claim 12, AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 and Fakoorian discloses “The method of claim 7, wherein the recipient device is one of the one or more other communications devices and the release signal is transmitted via a sidelink channel” (See Fakoorian [0067] a UE 115 may release an unused reserved resource to allow another sidelink UE 115 to reclaim the unused resources for sidelink transmissions. [0046] the inclusion of a resource release indication in SCI allows a sidelink UE to release an unused reserved sidelink resource and allows another sidelink UE to transmit in the resource that may otherwise by wasted). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of AWADIN and AWADIN ‘790 with the teachings of Fakoorian to include a release indication of unused resources/ portion of the COT, and the motivation to do so would have been to improve resource utilization efficiency (Fakoorian [0046]). Regarding claim 13, AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 discloses “The method of claim 1”, but does not explicitly disclose that the recipient device is defined as a default for the communications device acting as a release device. However, Fakoorian discloses “wherein the recipient device is defined as a default for the communications device acting as a release device” (See Fakoorian, Fig. 7B, [0109] the SCI A 712 may indicate reserved resources per sidelink. For instance, the SCI A may indicate that the resource 706a is reserved for transmission by the UE 715a to the UE 715b, the resource 706b is reserved for transmission by the UE 715b to the UE 715a, and the resource 706c is reserved for transmission by the UE 715b to the UE 715c). Note: The SCI A transmission implies that UE 715 b serves as the default or primary receiving device, since it the device receiving the SCI indicating resource release. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of AWADIN and AWADIN ‘790 with the teachings of Fakoorian to include a release indication of unused resources/ portion of the COT, and the motivation to do so would have been to improve resource utilization efficiency (Fakoorian [0046]). Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over AWADIN et al. (US 20230035989 A1) in view of AWADIN et al. (US 20220377790 A1) and further in view of Fakoorian et al. (US 20210176669 A1), and further in view of STEFANTOS et al. (US 20230309141 A1). Regarding claim 4, AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 and Fakoorian discloses “The method of claim 3”, and discloses transmitting a release signal, See Fakoorian [0067] a UE 115 may release an unused reserved resource to allow another sidelink UE 115 to reclaim the unused resources for sidelink transmissions. [0046] the inclusion of a resource release indication in SCI allows a sidelink UE to release an unused reserved sidelink resource and allows another sidelink UE to transmit in the resource that may otherwise by wasted. AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 and Fakoorian discloses transmitting a release signal for releasing unused resources via SCI, but does not explicitly disclose determining the portion of the COT dynamically and indicating it in a release signal. However, STEFANTOS discloses “wherein the portion of the channel occupancy time released is determined dynamically and indicated by transmitting a release signal” (See [0068] The UE may transmit information regarding the COT (e.g., in SCI), including the remaining COT duration). Note: AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 and Fakoorian disclose transmitting a release signal through SCI. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a POSITA before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have included the dynamically determined remaining COT duration as taught by STEFANTOS, in the SCI release signaling as taught by AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 and Fakoorian, since both convey COT-related information dynamically through SCI, and the motivation to do so would have been in order to provide better control of COT release and improve channel reuse efficiency. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over AWADIN et al. (US 20230035989 A1) in view of AWADIN et al. (US 20220377790 A1) and further in view of in view of LIANG et al. (US 20230363002 A1), and further in view of JIA et al. (US 20210068154 A1). Regarding claim 6, AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 discloses “The method of claim 1”, but does not explicitly disclose receiving a force release signal. However, LIANG discloses “comprising receiving a force release signal from one of the infrastructure equipment and one of the other communications devices, and the transmitting at least part of the data by the communications device in one or more of the communications resources of the channel occupancy time comprises transmitting the at least part of the data by the communications device in the one or more communications resources of the channel occupancy time until the force release signal is received” (See FIG. 2 [0078] As seen in FIG. 2, the gNB 5 of this example is configured to be able to cancel the uplink transmissions of a transmitting UE 3-1 when another UE 3-2 has higher priority uplink data to transmit (e.g. a higher priority URLLC transmission). In this example, this is achieved by sending an indication that transmission should be stopped (e.g. in the form of a COT ‘cancellation’ or ‘release’ indication), to the transmitting UE, using appropriate signalling during a downlink period of that UE's FFP. Note: In Fig. 2, the UE transmits at least part of its data until the force release signal is received), “the one or more portions of the channel occupancy time of the fixed frame period remaining unused by the communications device after the force release signal is received” (See Fig. 2, After receiving the force release signal, the remaining portion of the COT remains unused. [0083] The lower priority transmission is then cancelled, and the higher priority transmission(s) can continue, if needed, in one or more subsequent FFPs without interference from an ongoing lower priority transmission from the other UE 3-1. Note: Higher priority transmissions start in subsequent FFPs, which also means that the remaining portion of the COT remains unused). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of AWADIN and AWADIN ‘790 with the teachings of LIANG, and the motivation to do so would have been to provide improvements to a UE initiated access to unlicensed spectrum using a Listen-Before-Talk (LBT) approach (LIANG [0001]). AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 and LIANG does not explicitly disclose transmitting an acknowledgment in response to the force release signal. However, JIA discloses “and transmitting an acknowledgement in response to the force release signal” (See [0015] the receiving device further receives a channel release signal from the sending device, and the channel release signal is used to indicate the one or more other receiving devices to release the to-be-protected channel occupancy time indicated by the first channel occupancy signal; and the receiving device sends a release acknowledgement signal in response to the release signal). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of AWADIN, AWADIN ‘790 and LIANG, with the teachings of JIA, and the motivation to do so would have been to avoid collision between devices that need to perform transmission, thereby improving communication efficiency (JIA [0005]). Claims 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over AWADIN et al. (US 20230035989 A1) in view of AWADIN et al. (US 20220377790 A1), and further in view of Fakoorian et al. (US 20210176669 A1), and further in view of Bhattad et al. (US 20220377795 A1). Regarding claim 9, AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 and Fakoorian discloses “The method of claim 8”, but does not explicitly an indication of the portion of the unused COT as an offset from a start of the FFP and a duration. However, Bhattad discloses “wherein the release signal provides an indication of the portion of the channel occupancy time unused by the communications device as an offset from a start of the fixed frame period and a duration of the portion of the remaining one or more communications resources” (See [0027] A UE, sharing a COT may indicate in the uplink control indicator (UCI) the remaining COT duration, an offset indication identifying where the uplink transmission is expected to end). Note: It is implied that the offset is from a start of the transmission, which is the start of the FFP/ COT. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have included this information about the portion of the COT to be shared/ unused as taught by Bhattad in the release signal taught by AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 and Fakoorian, and the motivation to so do would have been in order to provide better control of COT release and improve channel reuse efficiency. Regarding claim 10, AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 and Fakoorian discloses “The method of claim 8”, but does not explicitly disclose a pre-configured index of a look-up table indicating a different offset from a start of the FFP and a duration. However, Bhattad discloses “wherein the release signal provides an indication of a pre- configured index of a look-up table each index indicating a different offset from a start of the fixed frame period and a different duration of the portion of the channel occupancy time released by the communications device” (See [0027] A UE, sharing a COT may indicate in the uplink control indicator (UCI) the remaining COT duration, an offset indication identifying where the uplink transmission is expected to end). Note: It is implied that the offset is from a start of the transmission, which is the start of the FFP/ COT. [0111] wherein the COT sharing information includes an index to a table shared by the UE and the serving base station, wherein the table includes a plurality of entries each identifying one or more of the remaining COT duration, the offset indication indicated as a remaining transmission time). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have included this information about the portion of the COT to be shared/ unused as taught by Bhattad in the release signal taught by AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 and Fakoorian, and the motivation to so do would have been in order to provide better control of COT release and improve channel reuse efficiency. Claims 17-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over AWADIN et al. (US 20230035989 A1) in view of AWADIN et al. (US 20220377790 A1), and further in view of Singh et al. (US 20230189338 A1). Regarding claim 17, AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 discloses “The method of claim 14, wherein the transmitting, by the communications device as the recipient device, at least part of the data in the one or more released portions of the unlicensed channel from the channel occupancy time of the fixed frame period of the release device, comprises transmitting the data by the communications device as the recipient device in the one or more released portions of the unlicensed channel from the channel occupancy time of the fixed frame period of the recipient device as one or more communications resources of a first fixed frame period of the recipient device” (See AWADIN [0096] An initiating device is allowed to grant an authorization to one or more associated responding devices to transmit on the current operating channel within the current COT 54. The Responding Device may perform transmissions on the current operating channel for the remaining COT 54 of the current Fixed Frame Period 51. [0198] The initiating FBE device may not occupy the whole COT. In fact, it may occupy a small portion of COT, which as described above may be labeled as Tx window, especially if the initiating FBE device is a UE. Therefore, such information may allow other nodes to exploit the remaining portion of the COT. Note: The responding/ recipient device uses the remaining/ unused portion of the COT to transmit at least part of its data). AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 does not disclose transmitting data on a COT of a second FFP that occurs after the first FFP. However, Singh discloses “and one or more communications resources of a channel occupancy time of a second fixed frame period of the recipient device, which second fixed frame period of the recipient device occurs as a next fixed frame period after the first fixed frame period” (See [0019] transmitting uplink data comprises segmenting the uplink data into two or more segments and one segment of the two or more segments includes an indication that the wireless device will transmit the next segment of the two or more segments using wireless device initiated COT in a next FFP of the first plurality of FFPs). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of AWADIN and AWADIN ‘790 with the teachings of Singh, and the motivation to do so would have been to facilitate reliable and low latency transmissions (Singh [0032]). Regarding claim 18, AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 and Singh discloses “The method of claim 17, wherein the transmitting the data includes not transmitting the data in an idle period of the first or the second fixed frame period of the recipient device” (See AWADIN [0120] Typically, transmissions during the idle window of the FFP are prohibited. See Singh [0094] a transmission may fall over the idle period of FFP, then following solutions can be considered. In some embodiments, the UE skips the transmission if a part of the transmission intersects the idle period. In some embodiments, the UE can transmit the transmission in the resource only that is not part of an idle period in an FFP (i.e., on COT only)). Regarding claim 19, AWADIN in view of AWADIN ‘790 and Singh discloses “The method of claim 17, wherein the transmitting the data includes transmitting the data without detecting whether one of the infrastructure equipment or one or more others of the communications devices as the release device transmits signals according to a clear channel assessment, CCA, phase of the unlicensed channel” (See AWADIN [0096] An initiating device is allowed to grant an authorization to one or more associated responding devices to transmit on the current operating channel within the current COT 54. If the gap between the responding device transmission and the last transmission by the initiating device that issued the grant is less than 16 us, the responding device transmit without performing a CCA 53. The Responding Device may perform transmissions on the current operating channel for the remaining COT 54 of the current Fixed Frame Period 51). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SALMA A AYAD whose telephone number is (571)270-0285. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 to 5:30 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yemane Mesfin can be reached at 5712723927. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SALMA AYAD/Examiner, Art Unit 2462 /KEVIN C. HARPER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2462
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 30, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 11, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 17, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672171
RANDOM ACCESS TIMELINE FOR A REDUCED CAPABILITY DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12659059
INTERFERENCE CANCELLATION APPROACH FOR NEW RADIO SYSTEMS
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12652696
HARQ FEEDBACK TRANSMISSION FOR SIDELINK COMMUNICATION IN UNLICENSED SPECTRUM
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12603827
ASYMMETRIC ROUTING RESOLUTIONS IN MULTI-REGIONAL LARGE SCALE DEPLOYMENTS WITH DISTRIBUTED GATEWAYS
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588046
DUAL CONNECTION ON BROADBAND MODEM
3y 9m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+2.3%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 54 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month