Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 23, 2026
Application No. 18/029,688

DOUGH CONDITIONER FOR BAKED PRODUCTS AND THE LIKE, WHICH REPLACES THE FAT CONTENT THEREOF AND PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Mar 31, 2023
Priority
Oct 05, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCTIB2020059340
Examiner
WATTS, JENNA A
Art Unit
1791
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Prodia S A S
OA Round
2 (Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allowance Rate
326 granted / 674 resolved
-16.6% vs TC avg
Strong +54% interview lift
Without
With
+54.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
692
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
81.3%
+41.3% vs TC avg
§102
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 674 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 18-21, 23-26 are allowable. The restriction requirement, as set forth in the Office action mailed on 11/3/2025, has been reconsidered in view of the allowability of claims to the elected invention pursuant to MPEP § 821.04(a). The restriction requirement is hereby withdrawn as to any claim that requires all the limitations of an allowable claim. Specifically, the restriction requirement in its entirety has been withdrawn from consideration because the claim(s) requires all the limitations of an allowable claim. Claims 27-35 are not rejected over any prior art, and Claims 34 and 35, as amended are indicated as allowable. In view of the above noted withdrawal of the restriction requirement, applicant is advised that if any claim presented in a divisional application is anticipated by, or includes all the limitations of, a claim that is allowable in the present application, such claim may be subject to provisional statutory and/or nonstatutory double patenting rejections over the claims of the instant application. Once a restriction requirement is withdrawn, the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 121 are no longer applicable. See In re Ziegler, 443 F.2d 1211, 1215, 170 USPQ 129, 131-32 (CCPA 1971). See also MPEP § 804.01. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 18-21, 23-26, 34 and 35 are allowed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 22, 27-33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 22 recites some limitations and then other limitations in parentheses, and it is unclear whether the limitations in parentheses are also required or further limiting the types of starch. Therefore, Applicant is recommended to either delete the parentheses or amend the limitations to render the claim definite. Claims 27, 28 recite limitations like “the raw materials” and “the mixer”, “the liquid raw material” and “the solid raw material”, among many others, and such claims lack antecedent basis in the claims. This is not an exhaustive listing of limitations that lack antecedent basis in these claims. Claims 27-33 recite “A process” or “The process” or “The procedure” and such preamble should be consistent throughout the process claims and should be corrected. Claim 30 recites “step b)” and Claim 27 recites stages and not steps. Similarly, Claim 33 recites “mixing step c)” and Claim 27 recites stages not steps. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed 2/2/2026, with respect to Claims 18-26 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, in light of Applicant’s claim amendments made, the 103 rejections have been withdrawn. The Examiner notes that Claim 22 has been rejected over 112b but will be allowed provided the 112b rejection is overcome. The Examiner notes that the restriction requirement previously set forth withdrawing Claims 27-35 is withdrawn and the Examiner is prepared to allow these claims as well, provided the 112b rejections are overcome. Applicant’s previously withdrawn claims 27-33 are replete with 112b issues and inconsistent claim terminology, as set forth above. Therefore, at this time, the office action is made final and deemed proper at this time. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JENNA A WATTS whose telephone number is (571)270-7368. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday. 9am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nikki Dees can be reached at 571-270-3435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JENNA A. WATTS Primary Examiner Art Unit 1791 /JENNA A WATTS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1791 5/20/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 31, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 31, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
May 11, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 02, 2026
Response Filed
May 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677846
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING BEVERAGES
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672662
COLLAGEN BEVERAGE COMPOSITION FOR NUTRITIONAL CONSUMPTION WITH NEUTRAL TO BASIC PH AND LOW DETECTABILITY
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12660828
NOVEL FROZEN CONFECTION SHAPED BAKERY ITEM COMPOSITIONS
4y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12660839
METHOD TO PREPARE A MIXTURE AND FOOD PRODUCTS DERIVING THEREFROM
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653199
Pulse and/or Legume Protein-Fortified Doughs and Baked Goods Comprising Lipase
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+54.2%)
3y 8m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 674 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month