Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/030,387

CONTROLLED LOCAL HEATING OF SUBSTRATES

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 05, 2023
Priority
Oct 06, 2020 — EU 20200373.7 +1 more
Examiner
TRAN, THIEN S
Art Unit
3761
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Nederlandse Organisatie Voor Toegepast-natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek Tno
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
979 granted / 1366 resolved
+1.7% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
1405
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
86.3%
+46.3% vs TC avg
§102
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§112
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1366 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1, 5, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious over Inagawa (US 2004/0065656) in view of Ramanan (US 2002/0186967). With respect to the limitations of claim 1, Inagawa teaches an apparatus for controlled local heating a target surface of a substrate (title, abstract, substrates 102, 0026), the apparatus comprising: a carrier having a carrier surface (Figs 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, support assemblies 120, 0025-0027) for carrying the substrate at a carried surface opposite the target surface, the carrier having a plurality of laterally distributed heating zones (Fig 5, thermally regulated zones 502i, 0035) that are thermally insulated (thermal isolators 504i, 0035, air gaps, thermally insulative material) from each other, and the respective heating zones comprise respective resistive heating elements (resistive heaters 506i, 0036) that are thermally coupled to a heat sink (Fig 8, shows heating elements 808 thermally coupled to stainless steel bottom plate 814, 0040, which is equivalent to a heat sink), and a controller configured to control a selective supply of electric energy (Fig 5, controller 510, multiple-output power source 508, 0036, controller 510 that facilitates thermal regulation of each zone 502i by controlling the power applied to each resistive heater 506i) to at least one of the respective resistive heating elements comprised in at least one of the plurality of laterally distributed heating zones, the plurality of laterally distributed heating zones are thermally insulated from each other in that the carrier defines slits that at least extend along portions of boundaries between mutually neighboring heating zones (Figs 4, 8, shows slots 2121-3 extending along boundaries of heat zones 2021-3), and the slits are in communication with an evacuation channel (Fig 4, top and bottom opening of slots 2121-3 are in communication with atmosphere in heating chamber 100, 0024, which is in a vacuum environment, 0030, vacuum environment each slot 2121-3; see fig 1 bottom pump). Inagawa discloses the claimed invention except for the slits and evacuation channel are arranged for providing a vacuum at the carrier surface, such that an atmospheric pressure at the target surface of the substrate presses the substrate to the carrier. However, Ramanan discloses the slits (Figs 1a-1c, flow channels 38, 0098) and evacuation channel (gap 62, 0098) are arranged for providing a vacuum at the carrier surface, such that an atmospheric pressure at the target surface of the substrate presses the substrate (0098, gap 62 may be used to pull a slight vacuum, e.g., a vacuum on the order of 3000 Pa to 14,000 Pa, against wafer 12 in order to help hold wafer 12 in position) to the carrier (bake plate 20, protuberances 56, 0095) is known in the art. It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to adapt the heating apparatus of Inagawa having a carrier with slits and an evacuation channel silent to pressing the substrate to the carrier with the slits and evacuation channel are arranged for providing a vacuum at the carrier surface, such that an atmospheric pressure at the target surface of the substrate presses the substrate to the carrier of Ramanan for the purpose of providing a known vacuum configuration that holds the wafer against the support plate in a desired position (0098). With respect to the limitations of claim 5, Inagawa teaches respective resistive heating elements are coupled to an electric power supply switched by respective switching elements that are controlled by the controller (Fig 5, controller 510, multiple-output power source 508, 0036, controller 510 that facilitates thermal regulation of each zone 502i by controlling the power applied to each resistive heater 506i, thermal regulation of each zone requires switching elements). With respect to the limitations of claims 10 and 11, Inagawa discloses the claimed invention except for the controller is configured to provide control signals for providing electric energy in a pulse width modulated (PWM) manner; the controller is configured to provide control signals for providing electric energy in an interleaved pulse width modulated (IPWM) manner. However, Ramanan discloses the controller is configured to provide control signals for providing electric energy in a pulse width modulated (PWM) manner (0136-0138); the controller is configured to provide control signals for providing electric energy in an interleaved pulse width modulated (IPWM) manner is known in the art (0136-0138) is known in the art. It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to adapt the heating apparatus of Inagawa having a controller providing control signals to the heating elements silent to pulse width modulation with the controller is configured to provide control signals for providing electric energy in a pulse width modulated (PWM) manner; the controller is configured to provide control signals for providing electric energy in an interleaved pulse width modulated (IPWM) manner of Ramanan for the purpose of a known heating control method that allows the temperatures of a heating element to be controlled with agility and precision over a wide dynamic range (0136). With respect to claim 13, Inagawa teaches a manufacturing method for controlled local heating a target surface of a substrate (title, abstract, substrates 102, 0026), the method comprising: providing a carrier (Figs 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, support assemblies 120, 0025-0027) with a plurality of laterally distributed heating zones (Fig 5, thermally regulated zones 502i, 0035) that are thermally insulated (thermal isolators 504i, 0035, air gaps, thermally insulative material) from each other, the respective heating zones comprise respective resistive heating elements (resistive heaters 506i, 0036) that are thermally coupled to a heat sink (Fig 8, shows heating elements 808 thermally coupled to stainless steel bottom plate 814, 0040, which is equivalent to a heat sink), and the carrier includes a carrier surface (support assemblies 120) for carrying the substrate at a carried surface (substrates 102) opposite the target surface, and selectively providing electric energy to at least one of the respective resistive heating elements comprised in at least one of the plurality of laterally distributed heating zones (Fig 5, controller 510, multiple-output power source 508, 0036, controller 510 that facilitates thermal regulation of each zone 502i by controlling the power applied to each resistive heater 506i), the plurality of laterally distributed heating zones are thermally insulated from each other in that the carrier defines slits that at least extend along portions of boundaries between mutually neighboring heating zones (Figs 4, 8, shows slots 2121-3 extending along boundaries of heat zones 2021-3), and the slits are in communication with an evacuation channel (Fig 4, top and bottom opening of slots 2121-3 are in communication with atmosphere in heating chamber 100, 0024, which is in a vacuum environment, 0030, vacuum environment each slot 2121-3; see fig 1 bottom pump). Inagawa discloses the claimed invention except for the slits and evacuation channel are arranged for providing a vacuum at the carrier surface, such that an atmospheric pressure at the target surface of the substrate presses the substrate to the carrier. However, Ramanan discloses the slits (Figs 1a-1c, flow channels 38, 0098) and evacuation channel (gap 62, 0098) are arranged for providing a vacuum at the carrier surface, such that an atmospheric pressure at the target surface of the substrate presses the substrate (0098, gap 62 may be used to pull a slight vacuum, e.g., a vacuum on the order of 3000 Pa to 14,000 Pa, against wafer 12 in order to help hold wafer 12 in position) to the carrier (bake plate 20, protuberances 56, 0095) is known in the art. It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to adapt the heating method of Inagawa having a carrier with slits and an evacuation channel silent to pressing the substrate to the carrier with the slits and evacuation channel are arranged for providing a vacuum at the carrier surface, such that an atmospheric pressure at the target surface of the substrate presses the substrate to the carrier of Ramanan for the purpose of providing a known vacuum configuration that holds the wafer against the support plate in a desired position (0098). With respect to the limitations of claim 14, Inagawa teaches comprising: providing the substrate with a heat sensitive material, and applying the method to change a state of the heat sensitive material (a plurality of large area substrates 102 may be heated or thermally regulated while being stored thereon). With respect to the limitations of claim 15, Inagawa in view of Ramanan discloses the providing electric energy is carried out in a pulse width modulated (PWM) manner (Ramanan, 0136-0138). Claims 2 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious over Inagawa (US 2004/0065656) in view of Ramanan (US 2002/0186967) as applied to claim 1, further in view of Ogawa (US 2016/0111331). With respect to the limitations of claim 2, Inagawa in view of Ramanan discloses the claimed invention except for the carrier surface of the carrier is provided with an adhesive layer. However, Ogawa discloses the carrier surface of the carrier (Figs 3-5, chuck table 51, 0041) is provided with an adhesive layer support (protective tape 3, 0041) is known in the art. It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to adapt the heating apparatus of Inagawa in view of Ramanan having a carrier with a carrier surface silent to an adhesive support layer with the carrier surface of the carrier is provided with an adhesive layer of Ogawa for the purpose of providing a known adhesive support layer that allows for wafer dicing to be suitably performed (0041). With respect to the limitations of claim 4, Inagawa in view of Ramanan and Ogawa discloses the claimed invention except for the heating zones of the carrier are supported by respective protrusions of the heat sink. However, Ogawa disclose using protrusions to support the substrate (Figs 1-4, spacers 206, 0028) and has the advantage of providing a known spaced-apart configuration the helps to limit or eliminate scratching to the substrate (0029). It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to adapt the heating apparatus of Inagawa in view Ramanan and Ogawa having heating zones of the carrier supported by the heat sink silent to protrusions with the protrusion configuration of Ogawa for the purpose of providing a known spaced-apart configuration the helps to limit or eliminate scratching or damage to the heating zones of the carrier. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious over Inagawa (US 2004/0065656) in view of Ramanan (US 2002/0186967) as applied to claim 1, further in view of Moslehi (US 2011/0021006). With respect to the limitations of claim 3, Inagawa in view of Ramanan discloses the claimed invention except for the carrier surface of the carrier is provided with an anti-stick layer. However, Moslehi discloses the carrier surface of the carrier is provided with an anti-stick layer (0148, there may be an optional surface coating, such as a thin Teflon layer, on the vacuum chuck surface to prevent the surface damage to the wafer surface) is known in the art. It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to adapt the heating apparatus of Inagawa in view of Ramanan having a carrier with a carrier surface silent to an anti-stick layer with the carrier surface of the carrier is provided with an anti-stick layer of Moslehi for the purpose of providing a known thin layer material that prevents surface damage to the wafer surface (0148). Claims 5, 7, 9 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious over Inagawa (US 2004/0065656) in view of Ramanan (US 2002/0186967) as applied to claim 1, further in view of Volfovski (US 2014/0197151). With respect to the limitations of claim 5, Inagawa in view of Ramanan discloses the claimed invention except for explicitly showing respective resistive heating elements are coupled to an electric power supply switched by respective switching elements that are controlled by the controller. However, Volfovski discloses respective resistive heating elements (Figs 1, 4, resistive heating elements 110, heater segment 410, 0032, 0033) are coupled to an electric power supply (power source 404, 0032) switched by respective switching elements (transistor switches 408, 0032) that are controlled by the controller (controller 402, 0032) is known in the art. It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to adapt the heating apparatus of Inagawa in view of Ramanan having respective heating elements connected to a power supply and controller silent to switches with the respective resistive heating elements are coupled to an electric power supply switched by respective switching elements that are controlled by the controller of Volfovski for the purpose of providing a known switching configuration that the allows for turning power from the power source on and off to the resistive heating elements (0032), thereby enabling independent control of the individual resistive heating elements. With respect to the limitations of claim 7, Inagawa in view of Ramanan discloses the claimed invention except for further comprising a sensing unit configured to provide a sense signal indicative for an observed process temperature; a feedback unit cooperating with the controller, causing the controller to provide control signals so as to minimize a deviation between the observed process temperature as indicated by the sense signal and a desired value of the process temperature as indicated by a target signal. However, Volfovski discloses further comprising a sensing unit (Figs 1A, 4, temperature monitoring devices 112, 0032) configured to provide a sense signal indicative for an observed process temperature; a feedback unit (inputs 420, 0034) cooperating with the controller (controller 402, 0034), causing the controller to provide control signals so as to minimize a deviation between the observed process temperature as indicated by the sense signal and a desired value of the process temperature as indicated by a target signal (0034, based at least in part on those inputs, the controller 402 controls the power source 404 and the multiplexor 406; 0037, maintaining the temperature of a substrate, or uniformly distributing heat to a substrate) is known in the art. It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to adapt the heating apparatus of Inagawa in view of Ramanan having a controller silent to a sensing unit with the further comprising a sensing unit configured to provide a sense signal indicative for an observed process temperature; a feedback unit cooperating with the controller, causing the controller to provide control signals so as to minimize a deviation between the observed process temperature as indicated by the sense signal and a desired value of the process temperature as indicated by a target signal of Volfovski for the purpose of providing a known temperature sensing unit that works in conjunction with the controller that allows for maintaining the temperature of a substrate, or uniformly distributing heat to a substrate. With respect to the limitations of claims 9 and 12, Inagawa in view of Ramanan and Volfovski discloses the sensing unit comprises a respective temperature sensor (Volfovski, Figs 1A, 4, temperature monitoring devices 112, 0032) for each resistive heating element (Volfovski, heating elements 110, 0022) configured to provide a sense signal indicative for the temperature of the resistive heating elements; further comprising a substrate transport device (Volfovski, Figs 1A, 1C, lift pins 138, 0031) to transport the substrate over the carrier surface. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious over Inagawa (US 2004/0065656) in view of Ramanan (US 2002/0186967) and Volfovski (US 2014/0197151) as applied to claims 1 and 5, further in view of Parkhe (US 2016/0329231). With respect to the limitations of claim 6, Inagawa in view of Ramanan and Volfovski discloses the claimed invention except for the respective switching elements are accommodated in the heat sink. However, Parkhe discloses locating the switching elements in the electrical controller, on the control board or any other suitable location (0084) is known in the art. It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to adapt the heating apparatus of Inagawa in view of Volfovski having a heat sink and respective switching elements silent to locating the switching elements in the heat sink with the locating the switching elements in heat sink of Parkhe for the purpose of locating the switching elements in another suitable location. Claims 8, 18, 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious over Inagawa (US 2004/0065656) in view of Ramanan (US 2002/0186967) and Volfovski (US 2014/0197151) as applied to claims 1 and 7, further in view of Erickson (US 2018/0148835). With respect to the limitations of claim 8, Inagawa in view of Ramanan and Volfovski discloses the claimed invention except for the sensing unit comprises a thermal camera arranged to determine a temperature distribution at the target surface of the substrate. However, Erickson discloses the sensing unit comprises a thermal camera arranged to determine a temperature distribution (0048, an in-chamber infrared camera may be used to detect temperatures and provide the temperature distribution data under an applied heat load) at the target surface of the substrate (0048, estimate a temperature distribution pattern of a substrate) is known in the art. It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to adapt the heating apparatus of Inagawa in view of Ramanan and Volfovski having a sensing unit silent to a thermal camera with the sensing unit comprises a thermal camera arranged to determine a temperature distribution at the target surface of the substrate of Erickson for the purpose of providing a known alternative sensing unit configuration that is suitable for estimating a temperature distribution pattern of a substrate. Claim 18 is similarly rejected as set forth in the rejection of claim 9 above. Claims 19 and 20 are similarly rejected as set forth in the rejection of claim 10 above. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious over Inagawa (US 2004/0065656) further in view of Ogawa (US 2016/0111331) as applied to claims 1 and 4, further in view of Volfovski (US 2014/0197151). Claim 17 is similarly rejected as set forth in the rejection of claim 5 above. Response to Amendments Claims 1 and 13 have been amended. Claim 16 is cancelled. Claims 1-15 and 17-20 are pending. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-15 and 17-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THIEN S TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-7745. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday [8:00-4:00]. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Crabb can be reached at 571-270-5095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THIEN S TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3761 5/26/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 05, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 15, 2026
Response Filed
May 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678894
Method for Welding an Attachment Piece to a Semiconductor Metallisation by Laser Welding
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673384
LASER PROCESSOR, LASER PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR MOUNTING CARTRIDGE
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667219
COOKING VESSEL
4y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667222
DC COOKING APPLIANCE
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661712
METHOD FOR THE ADDITIVE MANUFACTURE OF A TURBOMACHINE COMPONENT
4y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+24.1%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1366 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month