Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/030,406

DRAWING UNIT AND CORRESPONDING METHOD FOR METAL PRODUCTS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 05, 2023
Examiner
TOLAN, EDWARD THOMAS
Art Unit
3725
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
M E P Macchine Elettroniche Piegatrici S P A
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
1035 granted / 1324 resolved
+8.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1366
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
50.8%
+10.8% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1324 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1,4,5,9,13 and14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yu et al. (CN 204842760). Regarding claims 1 and 9, Yu discloses a drawing unit (Fig. 3) and drawing method for moving at least one metal product (A) along an axis of feed (between rollers; 2,4 Fig. 4) comprising a motorized roller (2; [0025], lines 2-3) and at least two contrast rollers (4; [0025], lines 4-5) which are disposed opposite the same motorized roller (2; Fig. 3) with respect to the axis of feed of the metal product (A). The two contrast rollers (4) are selectively mobile ([0030], lines 2-6) with respect to the motorized roller (2) along an axis of transverse movement (swing axis; arrows, Fig. 4) which swing axis is at a small pivot angle, substantially parallel to the axis of rotation (41) of the contrast rollers (4) to adjust to changes in wire diameter ([0015], lines 4-7) in an adjustment step. Regarding claim 4, Yu discloses a machine base (B) with which the motorized and contrast rollers (2,4) are operatively associated, a first support (6) and a second support (5) with which the contrast rollers (4) are operatively associated (Fig. 3). The second support (5) is selectively moved with respect to the base (B) along the axis of transverse movement (arrow, Fig. 4; [0026], lines 5-7). Regarding claim 5, the first support (21) “can be selectively moved” with respect to the second support by pivoting and the first support (6) is actuated by a pressing mechanism (7) to move transversely (downward, Fig. 3) to press the second support (5) and contrast rollers (4) against the motorized roller (2; [0028], lines 3-5 and [0030]). Regarding claim 13, the adjustment step moves the contrast rollers (4) at a small angle along the axis of transverse movement. Regarding claim 14, the adjustment step occurs as a function of diameter changes in the metal product ([0030], lines 2-5). Claim(s) 1,2,9 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mizuno et al. (JP 2001-121211). Regarding claims 1 and 9, Mizuno discloses a method and apparatus for moving steel product (7) along an axis of feed along a pass line (Fig. 2). Mizuno discloses (page 3; [0009], paragraph 4) a motorized roll (drive roll, 2; Fig. 1) rotated by a drive shaft (6), the drive roll (2) is oppositely positioned across the pass line (7, Fig. 2) from two movable contrast rollers (3, Fig. 1). The contrast rollers comprise ring rollers (3) that rotate around a roller shaft (5) and which are configured to be selectively mobile in an axial direction (Fig. 1) along the roller shaft (5), transversely to the pass line direction, with respect to the motorized roll (2). Each ring roller (3) is axially movable wherein at least two ring rollers (Fig. 1) are movable transversely to any same motorized roll structure (4) that is fixed along the roller shaft axis (page 4, paragraph 3). Regarding claims 2 and 10, each ring roller (3) faces another along the roller shaft axis; Fig. 1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yu et al. (CN 204842760) in view of Wang et al. (CN 104841804). Yu does not disclose that the contrast rollers are pressed against the metal product independently. Wang teaches that each contrast roller (4) is connected by an independent connecting plate (63) through a spring (64; Fig. 4) so that each of the contrast rollers press independently against metal product. It would have been obvious to the skilled artisan prior to the effective filing date of the present invention to modify the contrast rollers of Yu to include springs as taught by Wang so that the contrast rollers independently press against the metal product. Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yu et al. (CN 204842760) in view Kuwano et al. (6,604,663). Yu does not disclose a contrast roll position sensor. Kuwano teaches a transducer (10c,10d) for actuators (6) acting on a contrast roller (1a). It would have been obvious to the skilled artisan prior to the effective filing date of the present invention to include a position sensor in the drawing unit of Yu as taught by Kuwano in order to detect a position of the pinch roller. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 7 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art of record does not disclose two pairs of contrast rollers and two motorized rollers wherein at least two contrast rollers of at least two different pairs of contrast rollers are homologous and pivoted to contrast supports associated with first support, including the limitations of base claim 1 and intervening claims 4 and 5. Claim 12 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art of record does not disclose that in said drawing step, at least two metal products are drawn at the same time, wherein a first contrast roller of said at least two contrast rollers acts only on a first metal product and a second contrast roller acts only on a second metal product different from said first metal product, including the limitations of base claim 9. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 7-7-2025 have been fully considered and Yu is used to respond to the amendment to claim 1, incorporating dependent claim 3. Yu discloses that the contrast rollers (4) are configured to adjust along the axis (41) by swinging around the shaft (61), Applicant is claiming “substantially parallel” in claim 1, line 7 and the specification recites “substantially parallel” which does not have to be strictly parallel and Yu discloses pivoting the contrast rollers in Fig. 3 about the axis (41) wherein small angular pivots are read as substantially parallel. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDWARD THOMAS TOLAN whose telephone number is (571)272-4525. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chris Templeton can be reached at 571-270-1477. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EDWARD T TOLAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 05, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jul 07, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599953
METHOD FOR FORMING AND HEAT TREATING NEAR NET SHAPE COMPLEX STRUCTURES FROM SHEET METAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599948
Method and computer program product for calculating a pass schedule for a stable rolling process
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601189
ADJUSTABLE STOPPER ASSEMBLY FOR PRESS BRAKE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599954
HYDRAULIC FORMING MACHINE FOR PRESSING WORKPIECES, IN PARTICULAR FORGING HAMMER, AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A HYDRAULIC FORMING MACHINE, IN PARTICULAR A FORGING HAMMER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596345
FORMING STYLUS TOOL DESIGN AND TOOLPATH GENERATION MODULE FOR 3 AXIS COMPUTER NUMERICAL CONTROL MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+15.8%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1324 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month