Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/030,473

ENGINEERING-DESIGN-BASED WORKFLOW FOR VALVE RECONSTRUCTION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 05, 2023
Priority
Oct 07, 2020 — provisional 63/088,663 +1 more
Examiner
GHERBI, SUZETTE JAIME J
Art Unit
3774
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Children's Medical Center Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1188 granted / 1397 resolved
+15.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1418
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
39.6%
-0.4% vs TC avg
§102
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1397 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 4/22/26 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on all of the references applied in the prior rejection of record. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 8, 14, 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Graybill et al. 2017/0325940 in view of Cao et al. 20070208550. Current claims 1 and 17 recites: "1. (Original) A method of preparing an implantable material comprising: obtaining a target configuration for a biological valve; obtaining one or more characteristics of the biological valve to be reconstructed; obtaining one or more mechanical characteristics of the implantable material; and determining, based at least in part on the target configuration, the one or more biological valve characteristics, and the one or more mechanical characteristics of the implantable material, a pattern for the implantable material configured to reconstruct the biological valve, wherein the implantable material is anisotropic.” Graybill et al. discloses a method of preparing an implantable material (To help reconstruct/fabricate and surgically implant valve leaflets, a temporary disposable scaffold/fixture is provided. An injected molded polymer based material forms a three dimensional scaffold to help hold individual leaflets in place for pre-assembly (i.e., stitching the leaflets together in a desired configuration), para.0012; to allow a surgeon to sew together the corners of adjacent leaflets to form a 3D valve which can later be transferred into the patient for implantation, para.0038) comprising: obtaining a target configuration for a biological valve (To help reconstruct/fabricate and surgically implant valve leaflets, a temporary disposable scaffold/fixture is provided. An injected molded polymer based material forms a three dimensional scaffold to help hold individual leaflets in place for pre-assembly i.e., stitching the leaflets together in a desired configuration [i.e. target configuration], para.0012; the leaflets attached in a configuration to function as an aortic valve [i.e. biological valve] as known in the art, para.0033); obtaining one or more characteristics of the biological valve to be reconstructed (Commissure-to-commissure distances of the dissected aorta are sized with gages to determine what size individual leaflets will be required for reconstruction, para.0007; (Regarding the formation of leaflets for use on the scaffolds, thin tissue sheet(s) may be excised from the pericardium tissue having a desired thickness. Then, a desired shape for each leaflet is cut, usually with the help of a template of a chosen size, para.0040; the leaflets attached in a configuration to function as an aortic valve [i.e. biological valve] as known in the art, para.0033); obtaining one or more mechanical characteristics of the implantable material (To help reconstruct/fabricate and surgically implant valve leaflets, a temporary disposable scaffold/fixture is provided. An injected molded polymer based material forms a three dimensional scaffold to help hold individual leaflets in place for pre-assembly (i.e., stitching the leaflets together in a desired configuration), para.0012; A base ring 41 allows scaffold 40 to be free-standing on a convenient surface outside the patient to allow a surgeon to sew together the corners of adjacent leaflets to form a 3D valve which can later be transferred into the patient for implantation, para.0038; Regarding the formation of leaflets for use on the scaffolds, thin tissue sheet(s) may be excised from the pericardium tissue having a desired thickness. Then, a desired shape for each leaflet is cut, usually with the help of a template of a chosen size, para.0040); and determining, based at least in part on the target configuration, the one or more biological valve characteristics, and the one or more mechanical characteristics of the implantable material, a pattern for the implantable material! configured to reconstruct the biological valve (An injected molded polymer based material forms a three dimensional scaffold to help hold individual leaflets in place for pre-assembly (i.e., stitching the leaflets together in a desired configuration), para.0012; the leaflets attached in a configuration to function as an aortic valve, para.0033; A base ring 41 allows scaffold 40 to be free-standing on a convenient surface outside the patient to allow a surgeon to sew together the corners of adjacent leaflets to form a 3D valve which can later be transferred into the patient for implantation, para.0038; Regarding the formation of leaflets for use on the scaffolds, thin tissue sheet(s) may be excised from the pericardium tissue having a desired thickness. Then, a desired shape for each leaflet is cut, usually with the help of a template of a chosen size. A desired pattern is traced onto the tissue (e.g., with a biocompatible marking pen) and then cut out using scissors, para.0040; FIG. 16 shows a first pattern A for creating a unified leaflet set with particular leaflet sizes at particular positions in the set, para.0045; procedure for fabrication of a total biological valve reconstruction, para.0004). However Graybill et al. does not specify that the implantable material is anisotropic.” According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, the term anisotropic mean exhibiting properties with different values when measured in different directions. Cao et al. teaches that materials that exhibit anisotropic properties may be utilized in the production of preparing an implantable heart valve (see [0012; 0038]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention as made to modify Graybill et al. to utilize anisotropic implantable materials in order to product a prosthesis that mimics heart material properties that are directionally dependent mechanical, electrical, and structural properties of cardiac tissue. 5. Regarding Claim 2, Graybill et al. discloses the method of claim 1, wherein obtaining a target configuration for the biological valve includes obtaining a target size and/or shape of the implantable material (An injected molded polymer based material forms a three dimensional scaffold to help hold individual leaflets in place for pre- assembly i.e. stitching the leaflets together in a desired configuration, para.0012; a cutting tool for excising leaflets from a pericardial tissue sheet according to predetermined sizes and shapes, Abstract; to allow a surgeon to sew together the corners of adjacent leaflets to form a 3D valve which can later be transferred into the patient for implantation, para.0038; select a cutting block that provides the desired size and arrangement of leaflets needed to match the anatomy of a particular patient, para.0045). 6. Regarding Claim 3, Graybill et al. discloses the method of any one of claims 1-2, further including cutting the implantable material into the determined pattern (A plate 60 has a plurality of patterned openings 61-63 with respective sizes and/or shapes of the type useful for valve reconstruction. A desired pattern is traced onto the tissue (e.g., with a biocompatible marking pen) and then cut out using scissors, para.0040; a cutting tool for excising leaflets from a pericardial tissue sheet, wherein a leaflet having a desired contour and size is obtained by pressing the tool against the sheet, para.0015). 7. Regarding claim 8, Graybill et al. does not disclose measuring the stress-strain relationship of the implantable material. Cao teaches that materials may be measured for a stress strain relationship (see [0012; 0038; 0058]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the invention of Graybill et al. and measure the stress-strain relationship of the implantable materials in order to manufacture accurate parameters of the simulated heart valve. 8. Claim 5, 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Graybill et al. 2017/0325940 in view of Cao et al. 20070208550 and further in view of Mortier 2015/0112659. Graybill et al. has been disclosed supra however does not specify that measuring one or more characteristics of the biological valve to be reconstructed includes constructing a three-dimensional model of the biological valve. Mortier teaches that anatomical models of heart valves may be estimated based on 3D cardiac medical image dated (e.g. see [0033]). It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art to modify the invention of Graybill et al. and provide 3d modeling and measuring in order to provide more precise valve sizing and positioning. Allowable Subject Matter 9. Claims 4, 6, 9-10, 12-13, 15-16, 18-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion 9. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Suzette Gherbi whose telephone number is (571)272- 4751. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 7:00am-3:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http:/Avww.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Melanie Tyson can be reached on 571-272-9062. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent- center for more information about Patent Center and https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197. /SUZETTE J GHERBI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3774 July 8, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 05, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §103
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 22, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746117
PROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741060
GENERATING ENDOTHELIAL CELL-SEEDED VASCULAR GRAFTS
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12714503
METHOD FOR DEFINING A PLACEMENT POSITION
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12702541
BREAST IMPLANTS AND TISSUE EXPANDERS HAVING INTEGRATED SYSTEMS FOR FILLING IMPLANT SHELLS WITH FLUIDS, INFUSING FLUIDS, AND DRAINING FLUIDS FROM BREAST TISSUE SURROUNDING IMPLANT SHELLS
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702547
HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS, ARTIFICIAL VALVE FORMED BY SAME, AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+8.8%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1397 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month