Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/030,553

METHOD FOR PRODUCING PIG IRON IN A SHAFT FURNACE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Apr 06, 2023
Examiner
MCGUTHRY BANKS, TIMA MICHELE
Art Unit
1733
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe AG
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
941 granted / 1154 resolved
+16.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
65 currently pending
Career history
1219
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
33.0%
-7.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1154 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed 10/14/2025 fails to comply with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97, 1.98 and MPEP § 609 because the name of patentee or applicant of cited document for JP 2022525655 A is not in English and the Japanese Office Action is not in English It has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered as to the merits. Applicant is advised that the date of any re-submission of any item of information contained in this information disclosure statement, or the submission of any missing element(s) will be the date of submission for purposes of determining compliance with the requirements based on the time of filing the statement, including all certification requirements for statements under 37 CFR 1.97(e). See MPEP § 609.05(a). Drawings The drawings were received on 09/25/2025. These drawings are approved. Status of Claims Claims 1-10 and 14 are cancelled, Claim 11, 15, 19, and 20 are currently amended, Claims 12, 13, and 16-18 are previous amended, and Claims 21-28 are new. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL - The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 11-13 and 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, because the specification, while being enabling for substituting or displacing the cold gas stream by CO2 (page 4 and Figure 2) that is either separated out of an offgas combusting in the heat exchanger or blast heater or can be produced or deposited from other process (page 7), does not reasonably provide enablement for an uncirculated cold gas stream comprising CO2 that is provided from a CO2 separation that is separated out of an offgas combusted in the at least one heat exchanger as recited in Claim 11. The specification does not enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to use the invention commensurate in scope with these claims. Instant Claim 11 recites the cold gas stream is uncirculated, but separating CO2 from offgas combusted in same heat exchanger to which the CO2 is introduced is reads on a circulated gas stream. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11-13 and 15-20 are free from prior art rejections but are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) as stated above. Claims 21-28 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: CN 209722190 U does not suggest an uncirculated gas stream comprising at least 5% by volume of CO2 that is fed to a heat exchanger to form a gas stream to fed into the lower region of a shaft furnace as claimed. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Tima M. McGuthry-Banks whose telephone number is (571)272-2744. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 7:30 am to 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Keith D. Hendricks can be reached at (571) 272-1401. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Tima M. McGuthry-Banks Primary Examiner Art Unit 1733 /TIMA M. MCGUTHRY-BANKS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1733
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 06, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 25, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 07, 2025
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601024
HETEROSTRUCTURED ANTIMICROBIAL STAINLESS STEEL AND METHOD FOR SYNTHESIZING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601030
METHOD FOR PRODUCING REDUCED FORM OF METAL OXIDES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590347
PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING COLD-ROLLED AND ANNEALED STEEL SHEET WITH A VERY HIGH STRENGTH, AND SHEET THUS PRODUCED
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590761
DIRECT FLAME PREHEATING SECTION FOR A CONTINUOUS METAL STRIP PROCESSING LINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12569897
PRODUCTION METHOD FOR GRAIN-ORIENTED ELECTRICAL STEEL SHEET, AND PRODUCTION LINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+1.9%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1154 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month