Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/030,793

METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING STATOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 07, 2023
Examiner
CAZAN, LIVIUS RADU
Art Unit
3729
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Aisin Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
587 granted / 940 resolved
-7.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
988
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 940 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4 and 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sung (US2020/00212749A1) in view of Harada (JP2003317547A). Regarding claims 1, 4 and 6, Sung discloses a method for manufacturing a stator (100, Figs. 3-6) including a stator core (110, Figs. 3-6) and a coil portion (150, Figs. 3-6) disposed in the stator core, the method comprising: a disposing step for disposing the coil portion in the stator core (see [0097]). The coil portion includes a segment conductor (210, Fig. 4 and 9A) including a pair of slot housing portions (221a, 222a, Fig. 9A; see [0109]) to be housed in different slots (114, Fig. 3) of the stator core and a coil end portion (230a, Fig. 9A) connecting the pair of slot housing portions. The method comprises a bending step (see “bending” in [0097]) for bending the segment conductor, wherein the cross section forming step is performed, before the bending step, on a part of the segment conductor that is not bent in the bending step (the hairpins are formed by bending wire having rectangular section). However, Sung does not discloses details pertaining to how the magnet wire having rectangular cross section is formed. Pertinent to claim 1, Harada discloses (see [0013] and [0019]) a process of forming a magnet wire 10 (Figs. 1 and 9) having a rectangular cross-section, the process comprising: a cross section forming step for forming a sectional shape of the magnet wire 1’ by compressing the wire 1; a coating step for applying an insulation coating 104a to the wire 1’; a common heat treatment step for performing, after the cross section forming step and the coating step, by the same heat treatment (in annealing and insulation coating baking furnace 105), annealing of the wire 1’ whose sectional shape has been formed in the cross section forming step and baking of the insulation coating applied to the wire in the coating step; and Pertinent to claim 2, Harada discloses the common heat treatment step (in furnace 105) is a step of performing the heat treatment at a temperature at which the annealing of the wire whose sectional shape has been formed in the cross section forming step and the baking of the insulation coating applied to wire in the coating step are performable. Pertinent to claim 3, Harada discloses applying a thermosetting resin (see polyimide and polyamideimide in [0014], the same resins as recited in [0035] of the present application) to the coil portion as the insulation coating, and the common heat treatment step is a step of performing the heat treatment at an annealing temperature of the coil portion that is higher than a curing temperature at whichthe thermosetting resin serving as the insulation coating applied to the coil portion in the coating step is cured by the baking. Pertinent to claim 7, Harada discloses the common heat treatment step is a step of performing the heat treatment by using the same heating apparatus (105) to perform the annealing of the wire whose sectional shape has been formed in the cross section forming step and the baking of the insulation coating applied to the wire in the coating step. Pertinent to claim 8, Harada discloses the common heat treatment step is a step of performing the heat treatment at the same heating temperature (in furnace 105) to perform the annealing of the wire whose sectional shape has been formed in the cross section forming step and the baking of the insulation coating applied to the wire in the coating step. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have found it obvious to utilize the process taught by Hurada to form a magnet wire having a rectangular cross section, for use as the magnet wire with rectangular cross section of Sung, as a choice among conventional magnet wire manufacturing processes, with predictable results. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 5 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LIVIUS R CAZAN whose telephone number is (571)272-8032. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday noon-8:30 pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sunil K Singh can be reached at 571-272-3460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LIVIUS R. CAZAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 07, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12550268
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CIRCUIT WIRING BY THREE-DIMENSIONAL ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12528254
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A 3D ELECTROMECHANICAL COMPONENT HAVING AT LEAST ONE EMBEDDED ELECTRICAL CONDUCTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12506458
PACKAGING MODULE AND PACKAGING METHOD OF BAW RESONATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12501551
Method for Embedding a Component in a Printed Circuit Board
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12500494
METHOD FOR HARDENING A BRIDGE ASSEMBLY OF A ROTATIONAL BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+12.7%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 940 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month