Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/031,758

DISPLAY PANELS INCLUDING SEGMENTED CONVEX RIB

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 13, 2023
Priority
May 31, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2022096471
Examiner
SOWARD, IDA M
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allowance Rate
1263 granted / 1354 resolved
+25.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1383
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
37.7%
-2.3% vs TC avg
§102
36.4%
-3.6% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1354 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in response to the Applicant’s amendment filed June 15, 2026. Drawings The objection to the drawings has been withdrawn due to the amendment filed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6, 10, 19, 25 and 27-28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cao et al. (CN 101866584 A) in view of Qin et al. (CN 113130822 A). In regard to claim 1, Cao et al. teach a display panel, comprising a display area (center) and a frame area (at 711/721) surrounding the display area (center), the display panel comprising: a base substrate 71 and a cover plate 72 opposite to each other; one or more convex ribs 711/721 on at least one of the base substrate 71 and the cover plate 72, wherein each convex rib 711/721 of at least some of the convex ribs comprises a plurality of rib segments (See Figure 8) connected sequentially along an extension trajectory of the convex rib, and an angle is formed between adjacent two of the rib segments (See Figure 8); and an encapsulation structure 73 between the base substrate 71 and the cover plate 72 and covering the convex ribs 711/721(Figures 7-8, pages 8-9, paragraphs [0049]-[0059]). In regard to claim 4, Cao et al. teach a plurality of convex rib groups (at 711/721) are provided on at least one of the base substrate 71 and the cover plate 72 and are distributed at intervals, each convex rib group of the convex rib groups (at 711/721) comprising one or more of the convex ribs 711/721 (Figures 7-8, pages 8-9, paragraphs [0049]-[0059]). In regard to claim 5, Cao et al. teach multiple of the convex rib groups (at 711/721) in the frame area (at 711/721), and distributed at intervals along a periphery of the display area (center) (Figures 7-8, pages 8-9, paragraphs [0049]-[0059]). In regard to claim 6, Cao et al. teach the frame area (at 711/721) in a ring shape and comprises at least one corner portion, and a density of the convex ribs at the corner portion of the frame area (at 711/721) is greater than that of the convex ribs 711/721 at other portions of the frame area (at 711/721) (Figures 7-8, pages 8-9, paragraphs [0049]-[0059]). In regard to claim 10, Cao et al. teach the encapsulation structure 73 comprising a sealant provided in the frame area (at 711/721) and bonded between the base substrate 71 and the cover plate 72; and wherein one of the convex ribs 711/721 is provided in the frame area (at 711/721) and is covered by the sealant, or wherein multiple of the convex ribs are provided in the frame area and are at least partially covered by the sealant (Figures 7-8, pages 8-9, paragraphs [0049]-[0059]). In regard to claim 25, Cao et al. teach the convex rib group (See Figure 8) comprises multiple of the convex ribs 711/721 distributed at intervals, with a trench being formed between adjacent two of the multiple of the convex ribs 711/721 (Figures 7-8, pages 8-9, paragraphs [0049]-[0059]). In regard to claim 27, Cao et al. teach the convex ribs 711/721 provided on the base substrate 71 and the cover plate 72, and orthographic projections of the convex ribs 711 on the base substrate 71 on the cover plate and the convex ribs 721 on the cover plate 72 are arranged at intervals (Figures 7-8, pages 8-9, paragraphs [0049]-[0059]). In regard to claim 28, Cao et al. teach a display apparatus, comprising the display panel according to claim 1 (Figures 7-8, pages 8-9, paragraphs [0049]-[0059]). However, Cao et al. fail to teach the encapsulation structure comprising an encapsulation layer; wherein the base substrate comprises a base, a light-emitting unit, and a barrier dam; wherein the light-emitting unit is provided on the base, and the encapsulation layer covers the light-emitting unit; wherein the barrier dam is provided on the base and located in the frame area, and the barrier dam is configured to block a portion of the encapsulation layer; and wherein one or more of the convex ribs are provided in the frame area on a side of the barrier dam away from the display area. Qin et al. teach an encapsulation structure 80 comprising an encapsulation layer 81/82/83; wherein the base substrate comprises a base 10, a light-emitting unit 31, and a barrier dam 90; wherein the light-emitting unit 31 is provided on the base 10, and the encapsulation layer 81/82/83 covers the light-emitting unit 31; wherein the barrier dam 90 is provided on the base and located in the frame area 103, and the barrier dam 90 is configured to block a portion 82 of the encapsulation layer 80; and wherein one or more of the convex ribs 80 are provided in the frame area 103 on a side of the barrier dam 90 away from the display area 101. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the display device structure as taught by Cao et al. with the display device having an encapsulation structure comprising an encapsulation layer; wherein the base substrate comprises a base, a light-emitting unit, and a barrier dam; wherein the light-emitting unit is provided on the base, and the encapsulation layer covers the light-emitting unit; wherein the barrier dam is provided on the base and located in the frame area, and the barrier dam is configured to block a portion of the encapsulation layer; and wherein one or more of the convex ribs are provided in the frame area on a side of the barrier dam away from the display area as taught by Qin et al. to prevent failure of the display panel (page 2). In regard to claim 2, Qin et al. teach the plurality of rib segments (of 40) comprise at least a first rib segment (of 40), a second rib segment (of 40), and a third rib segment (of 40) connected sequentially, a first angle is formed between the first rib segment (of 40) and the second rib segment (of 40), and a second angle is formed between the third rib segment (of 40) and the second rib segment (of 40), and an end of the first rib segment (of 40) away from the second rib segment (of 40) and an end of the third rib segment (of 40) away from the second rib segment (of 40) are on a same side in a width direction of the second rib segment (of 40) (Figure 4, pages 13-18). In regard to claim 3, Qin et al. teach the angle formed between the adjacent two of the rib segments (of 40) being an obtuse angle (Figure 4, pages 13-18). In regard to claim 19, Qin et al. teach the base substrate comprising: a base 10; a pixel definition layer 32 on a side of the base 10 and with a pixel opening (in 32); and a light-emitting unit 31 in the pixel opening (in 32), wherein orthographic projections of the convex ribs 40/90 in the non-display area 103/104 on the base 10 are within an orthographic projection of the pixel definition layer 32 on the base 10 (Figures 4-5, pages 13-18). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 29 is allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: In regard to claim 29, The prior art of record (Cao et al. (CN 101866584 A) in view of Qin et al. (CN 113130822 A)) does not disclose, make obvious, or otherwise suggest the structure of the applicant's claimed invention, such as the configuration of the display area, frame area, base substrate, cover plate, convex ribs, rib segments, angles, encapsulation structure, base, light-emitting unit, encapsulation layer, sealant. Claims 7, 11, 14, 20 and 23 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 8-9 are objected to as being dependent upon objected claim 7. Claim 16 is objected to as being dependent upon objected claim 14. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 02/05/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Cao et al. (CN 101866584 A) further in view of Qin et al. (CN 113130822 A) to teach the claimed subject matter from canceled claim 13. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following patents are cited to further show the state of the art with respect to display devices: Wang et al. (CN 113013221 A). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to IDA M SOWARD whose telephone number is (571)272-1845. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Thursday, 7am to 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Leonard Chang can be reached on 571-570-3691. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. IMS July 14, 2026 /IDA M SOWARD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 13, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 09, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 05, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 15, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707861
SPLICED SCREEN AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701879
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701873
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS INCLUDING TRANSMISSION AREA WITHIN COMPONENT AREA
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695198
TERAHERTZ TRANSCEIVER INCLUDING TRIPLE-BARRIER RESONANT TUNNELING DIODE
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12696669
DISPLAY APPARATUS INCLUDING MULTILAYER NEUTRAL PLANE COMPENSATION MEMBER
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+5.5%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1354 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month