Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/032,068

Solid-State Battery Management System for High Current Applications

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 14, 2023
Examiner
ZHOU, ZIXUAN
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Auto Motive Power Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
463 granted / 605 resolved
+8.5% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
635
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
55.7%
+15.7% vs TC avg
§102
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 605 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 04/14/2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 5-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Saito et al. US Pub 2018/0309308 (hereinafter Saito). Regarding claim 1, Saito teaches a battery management system (BMS) printed circuit board assembly (PCBA) for managing a battery (fig. 1, element 2) comprising: PNG media_image1.png 974 1262 media_image1.png Greyscale a plurality of solid-state power transistors in back-to-back serial configuration (see fig. 1, elements 3 and 4; the charge control FET and the discharge control FET in back-to-back serial configuration) configured to connect and disconnect the battery (¶¶ 0009, 0025-0026, 0028-0032; turning on/off elements 3 and 4), and to function as resettable fuse (repeatedly turning on/off by a control circuit), gate drive circuitries configured to turn on and off the solid-state power transistors (¶¶ 0025, 0028; turns off the charge control FET3 and instruct turning on of the charge control FET3 to the control circuit…the control circuit turns on the charge control FET3), one or more shunt resistors configured for current sensing (¶ 0026; detecting the overcurrent situation), a battery monitoring application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) (fig. 1, element 1a), and a microprocessor (fig. 1; overcurrent detection circuit and control circuit 1b are able to receive inputs, process inputs, and generate output signal and ¶ 0026), wherein the battery monitoring ASIC (claim 1; a charge/discharging monitoring circuit configured to output a signal to instruct turning off of the charge control FET or the discharging control FET to the control circuit in response to detection of overcharge or overdischarge of the secondary battery) and the microprocessor (claim 1; an overcurrent detection circuit configured to output a signal to instruct turning off of the discharge control FET to the control circuit according to the detection of a discharge overcurrent) are configured to provide redundant overcurrent detection (¶ 0026; in such an overcharge detection state, the load 30 is connected between the charge/discharge terminal P+ and the discharge terminal DIS-, and the load 30 goes into an abnormal state to make a large current flow, then a potential difference developed across the resistor becomes large, exceeding a voltage determined to be a discharge overcurrent. The overcurrent detection circuit 1c detects the discharge overcurrent and outputs signal to instruct turning off of the discharge control FET4 to the control circuit 1b; further claim 1; a charge/discharging monitoring circuit configured to output a signal to instruct turning off of the charge control FET or the discharging control FET to the control circuit in response to detection of overcharge or overdischarge of the secondary battery. 1) The charge/discharge monitoring circuit continuously monitors the battery’s voltage level and provide control signals when the battery reaches overcharge voltage, because the charge/discharge monitoring circuit monitors battery voltage directly, it can determine abnormal conditions that can be caused by excessive current (e.g., a sudden voltage drop or rise outside normal range, and excessive charging current can cause overcharge by driving the battery voltage rise above its safe limit), then the charge/discharging monitoring circuit configured to output a signal to instruct turning off of the charge control FET or the discharging control FET to the control circuit in response to detection of overcharge or overdischarge of the secondary battery. 2) The overcurrent detection circuit 1c directly detects the discharge overcurrent and outputs signal to instruct turning off of the discharge control FET4 to the control circuit 1b in ¶ 0026 and claim 1. Therefore, the charge/discharge monitoring circuit and the overcurrent detection circuit provide redundant overcurrent detection). Regarding claim 5, Saito teaches wherein the gate drive circuitries comprise of a fast gate turn-off circuit configured to turn off the transistors when responding to an over-current fault (¶ 0026 and claim 1; able to turn on/off the FET/MOSFET). Regarding claim 6, Saito teaches wherein the gate drive circuitries comprise of a charge pump circuit configured to turn on and off the solid-state power transistors (¶ 0026 and claim 1; capable of turning on/off the switches). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Saito et al. US Pub 2018/0309308 (hereinafter Saito). Regarding claim 2, Saito teaches wherein the plurality of solid-state power transistors are arranged in a common drain configuration. Rearranging the order of the first FET and the second FET in the circuit, does not show any criticality, is only considered to be an obvious modification of the Saito device that a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would be able to provide using routine experimentation since the courts have held that there is no invention in shifting the position if the operation of the device would not be thereby modified. See In re Japikse, 86 USPQ 70 (CCPA 1950) and MPEP 2144.04 VI. Claim(s) 3-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Saito in view of Klowak et al. US 2016/0240471 (hereinafter Klowak). Regarding claim 3, Saito fails to teach wherein the plurality of solid-state power transistors comprise drain pins connected to large copper pads with vias to cool the solid-state power transistors through surrounding air convection. Klowak further discloses wherein the plurality of solid-state power transistors (¶ 0067; GaN chip includes a silicon substrate and overlying GaN semiconductor layers, defining a large area lateral GaN power transistor) comprise drain pins connected to large copper pads with vias (¶ 0068; vias or contact openings are provided through the polyimide layer to expose the underlying on-chip metal layer. The Cu RDL fills the contact openings to provide larger area source and drain interconnects…the thick back-side copper foil layer is patterned to define the external contact pads) to cool the solid-state power transistors through surrounding air convection (¶ 0037; copper layer is attached for thermal dissipation). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Saito to incorporate with the teaching of Klowak by including a back-side copper layer providing a back-side heat-plate, because it would be advantageous to increase lifetime of switching devices and avoid package cracking. Regarding claim 4, Saito fails to teach the BMS PCBA further comprising a metal clad or metal core printed circuit board (PCB). Klowak further discloses the BMS PCBA further comprising a metal clad or metal core printed circuit board (PCB) (¶¶ 0083-0086; underlying copper foil layers, to respective contact areas and then plating copper therein, to form conducive copper pillars and/or posts…Thus the package can be mounted on an underlying thermal subtract, e.g. on a printed circuit board providing thermal vias for heat dissipation from the external thermal pad of the package, and corresponding source, drain, gate and source sense contact areas for electrical connections). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Saito to incorporate with the teaching of Klowak by including a back-side copper layer providing a back-side heat-plate, because it would be advantageous to reduce silicon aging rate and prolong the service of the device. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Saito in view of Kang (US Pub 2017/0025872) Regarding claim 7, Saito fails to teach the BMS PCBA further comprising a pre-charge circuit using MOSFET and resistors connected in parallel to one or more of the solid-state power transistors. PNG media_image2.png 362 738 media_image2.png Greyscale However, Kang further discloses a pre-charge circuit (including a resistor R, a relay 114) using MOSFET and resistors connected in parallel (see fig. 2, elements R and 114 connected in parallel with element 112) to one or more of the solid-state power transistors (fig. 2 and ¶¶ 0066, 0068, 0071, 0074). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Saito to incorporate with the teaching of Kang by including a pre-charge circuit in the system, because it would be advantageous to prevent damage of the main switching device due to input of an inrush current generated. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZIXUAN ZHOU whose telephone number is (571)272-6739. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 am to 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Taelor Kim can be reached at 571-270-7166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZIXUAN ZHOU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859 01/23/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 14, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603800
TERMINATING RESISTANCE SETTING CIRCUIT AND BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594850
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRIORITIZING VEHICLE CHARGING USING ENERGY FROM RENEWABLE OR LOW CARBON EMISSION SOURCES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12573858
POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573886
LAMINAR COIL ARRAY IN A MULTI-DEVICE WIRELESS CHARGER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12558982
INTELLIGENT BREADCRUMB NAVIGATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+17.2%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 605 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month