Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/032,345

CARBON FIBER REINFORCED CERAMIC ATOMIZING CORE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Apr 18, 2023
Examiner
SIMONE, CATHERINE A
Art Unit
1781
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Shenzhen Anxin Precision Components Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
684 granted / 937 resolved
+8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
983
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
38.7%
-1.3% vs TC avg
§102
36.6%
-3.4% vs TC avg
§112
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 937 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-6 and 11-14, in the reply filed on 1/20/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 7-10 and 15-19 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 1/20/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2, 4, 5, 11, 13 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 2, 4 and 5 recite the limitation "the granularity". There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claims. Appropriate correction is requested. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tan et al. (CN110282979A) [hereinafter Tan]. Tan discloses a carbon fiber reinforced ceramic atomizing core, comprising, by mass, the following materials: 30-70 parts of ceramic powder (aggregate; Example 3; paragraph [0060]; claims 1-2), 1-10 parts of carbon fibers (carbon fiber additive; Example 3; paragraph [0064]; claim 1), 10-50 parts of a sintering aid (sintering adhesive; Example 3; paragraph [0061]; claim 1), and 0-30 parts of a pore former (Example 3; paragraph [0062]; claim 1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yu et al. (CN111205104A) [hereinafter Yu] in view of Tan et al. (CN110282979A) [hereinafter Tan]. Regarding claim 1, Yu teaches a ceramic atomizing core, comprising, by mass, the following materials: 30-70 parts of ceramic powder (abstract), 10-50 parts of a sintering aid (abstract), and 0-30 parts of a pore former (abstract). Yu fails to teach the ceramic atomizing core comprising 1-10 parts of carbon fibers. Tan teaches that it is well known in the porous ceramic art for electronic cigarettes to include 1-5% carbon fibers (additive; Example 3; claim 1) in the porous ceramic for the purpose of enhancing the activation ability of other components and to change the viscosity of the component (paragraph [0037]). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the porous ceramic of Yu to include 1-5 parts of carbon fibers as suggested by Tan in order to increase the activation ability of the other components and change the viscosity, thereby improving the ceramic atomizing core. Regarding claim 6, Yu discloses the ceramic atomizing core further including 20-40 parts of paraffin (abstract). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 3 and 12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The cited prior art, Tan (CN110282979) and Yu (CN111205104), both fail to teach or reasonably suggest the distinct features of “wherein the carbon fibers are active carbon fibers formed by carbonization at 1100oC-1200oC, and have a length of 0.05 mm-1 mm”. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CATHERINE A SIMONE whose telephone number is (571)272-1501. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Frank Vineis can be reached at 571-270-1547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CATHERINE A. SIMONE Examiner Art Unit 1781 /Catherine A. Simone/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1781
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 18, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 18, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600095
Forming Joints Between Composite Components
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595205
GLASS SUBSTRATE, COVER GLASS, ASSEMBLY, ASSEMBLY MANUFACTURING METHOD, IN-VEHICLE DISPLAY DEVICE, AND IN-VEHICLE DISPLAY DEVICE MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583208
MULTILAYER STRUCTURE, PACKAGING MATERIAL IN WHICH SAME IS UTILIZED, REGRIND COMPOSITION, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING REGRIND COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571980
Optical Module Component Features that Aid Adhesive Attachment
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570075
TRANSPARENT RESIN FILM, DECORATIVE BOARD, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING DECORATIVE BOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+23.2%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 937 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month