Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/032,583

DISCONTINUOUS RECEPTION METHOD AND USER EQUIPMENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 19, 2023
Examiner
VALLAMDASU, SHIVAKRISHNA
Art Unit
2468
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allow Rate
5 granted / 5 resolved
+42.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
41
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
64.3%
+24.3% vs TC avg
§102
32.2%
-7.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 5 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This action is responsive to claims filed on 02/17/2026 and Information Disclosure Statements filed on 04/19/2023. Claims 11-12 are pending for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 11 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. (US 20230276458A1) in view of Kwon et al. (US 20250309969 A1). With regarding Claim 11: Lee disclose User equipment (UE), comprising a processor configured to: receive a medium access control (MAC) packet data unit (PDU) a medium access control (MAC), packet data unit (PDU) for a multicast broadcast service (MBS) identifier, which is a group-radio network temporary identifier (G-RNTI) (See FIG. 13-14 and ¶[0005], [0242]-[0243], [0005], [0128], [0200]-[0201], [0177]-[0180]. Disclosed a UE comprising one or more processors configured to implement the disclosed methods. And receiving a PDCCH (DCI) scrambled with a G-RNTI for a multicast service and receiving the corresponding PDSCH(which carries the MAC PDU/TB). And that the BS inform); and in response to receiving the MAC PDU for the G-RNTI, determine whether hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) feedback is enabled for the G-RNTI (See ¶[0177]-[0180], [0263]. Disclosed the UE checks the HARQ enablement configuration (received via RRC/SIB) upon reception of MBMS service data to decide whether to transmit feedback. This is standard MAC layer behavior triggered by PDU reception.), and Lee may not explicitly disclose in a case that the HARQ feedback is enabled for the G-RNTI, start a timer drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL for a corresponding HARQ process in a first symbol after the end of the corresponding transmission carrying the HARQ feedback, wherein the timer drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL defines a minimum duration before a downlink assignment for HARQ retransmission, and the timer drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL is per downlink (DL) HARQ process except for the broadcast process. However, in analogous art, Kwon disclose in a case that the HARQ feedback is enabled for the G-RNTI, start a timer drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL for a corresponding HARQ process in a first symbol after the end of the corresponding transmission carrying the HARQ feedback (See ¶[0078]-[0088]. Disclosed start the Drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL for the corresponding HARQ process in the first symbol after the end of the corresponding transmission carrying the DL HARQ feedback), wherein the timer drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL defines a minimum duration before a downlink assignment for HARQ retransmission (See ¶[0075]-[0076]. Disclosed define the timer and the minimum duration before a downlink assignment for HARQ retransmission.), and the timer drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL is per downlink (DL) HARQ process except for the broadcast process (See ¶[0075]-[0076]. Disclosed per downlink HARQ process-expect for the broadcast process). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine Kwon teaches to Lee teachings. Lee teaches DRX configuration for MBS/G-RNTI reception in RRC_CONNECTED state ¶[0128], [0256]-[0269], and Kwon teaches DRX timer mechanism for downlink HARQ processes including drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL ¶[0075]-[0088]. This combination solve the configure UE DRX behavior to reduce power consumption while maintaining reliable data reception with HARQ retransmission support. receiving PDCCH with G-RNTI for MBS services. Lee teaches starting drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL upon HARQ feedback reception. Combining them yields the predictable results of improved HARQ coordination in a multicast-enable system and more efficient HARQ retransmission timing and improved DRX operation. With regarding Claim 12: Lee disclose a communication method for user equipment (UE), comprising: receive a medium access control (MAC) packet data unit (PDU) a medium access control (MAC), packet data unit (PDU) for a multicast broadcast service (MBS) identifier, which is a group-radio network temporary identifier (G-RNTI) (See FIG. 13-14 and ¶[0005], [0242]-[0243], [0005], [0128], [0200]-[0201], [0177]-[0180]. Disclosed a UE comprising one or more processors configured to implement the disclosed methods. And receiving a PDCCH (DCI) scrambled with a G-RNTI for a multicast service and receiving the corresponding PDSCH(which carries the MAC PDU/TB). And that the BS inform); and in response to receiving the MAC PDU for the G-RNTI, determine whether hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) feedback is enabled for the G-RNTI (See ¶[0177]-[0180], [0263]. Disclosed the UE checks the HARQ enablement configuration (received via RRC/SIB) upon reception of MBMS service data to decide whether to transmit feedback. This is standard MAC layer behavior triggered by PDU reception.), and Lee may not explicitly disclose in a case that the HARQ feedback is enabled for the G-RNTI, start a timer drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL for a corresponding HARQ process in a first symbol after the end of the corresponding transmission carrying the HARQ feedback, wherein the timer drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL defines a minimum duration before a downlink assignment for HARQ retransmission, andthe timer drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL is per downlink (DL) HARQ process except for the broadcast process. However, in analogous art, Kwon disclose in a case that the HARQ feedback is enabled for the G-RNTI, start a timer drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL for a corresponding HARQ process in a first symbol after the end of the corresponding transmission carrying the HARQ feedback (See ¶[0078]-[0088]. Disclosed start the Drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL for the corresponding HARQ process in the first symbol after the end of the corresponding transmission carrying the DL HARQ feedback), wherein the timer drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL defines a minimum duration before a downlink assignment for HARQ retransmission (See ¶[0075]-[0076]. Disclosed define the timer and the minimum duration before a downlink assignment for HARQ retransmission.), and the timer drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL is per downlink (DL) HARQ process except for the broadcast process (See ¶[0075]-[0076]. Disclosed per downlink HARQ process-expect for the broadcast process). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine Kwon teaches to Lee teachings. Lee teaches DRX configuration for MBS/G-RNTI reception in RRC_CONNECTED state ¶[0128], [0256]-[0269], and Kwon teaches DRX timer mechanism for downlink HARQ processes including drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL ¶[0075]-[0088]. This combination solve the configure UE DRX behavior to reduce power consumption while maintaining reliable data reception with HARQ retransmission support. receiving PDCCH with G-RNTI for MBS services. Lee teaches starting drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL upon HARQ feedback reception. Combining them yields the predictable results of improved HARQ coordination in a multicast-enable system and more efficient HARQ retransmission timing and improved DRX operation. Conclusion The prior art Lee et al.(US 20230276458 A1) cited in the previously made of record. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHIVAKRISHNA VALLAMDASU whose telephone number is (571)272-5249. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Smith, Marcus R. can be reached on (571) 270-1096. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHIVAKRISHNA VALLAMDASU/Examiner, Art Unit 2468 /MARCUS SMITH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2468
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 19, 2023
Application Filed
May 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 25, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 10, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 17, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604238
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SUPPORTING NEW SERVICE IN WIRELESS COMMUNCIATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588041
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING SIDELINK INFORMATION IN UNLICENSED BAND IN FRAME-BASED CHANNEL ACCESS METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 2 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+0.0%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 5 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month