Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/032,688

NOZZLE, DEVELOPMENT DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING OBJECT BEING TREATED

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 19, 2023
Examiner
CERNOCH, STEVEN MICHAEL
Art Unit
3752
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Sintokogio Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 0m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allow Rate
382 granted / 721 resolved
-17.0% vs TC avg
Strong +41% interview lift
Without
With
+41.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
763
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
44.4%
+4.4% vs TC avg
§102
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§112
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 721 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of group I, claims 1-5 in the reply filed on 1/20/2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 6-15 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 1/20/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Williams et al. (US Pat No 5,779,159). Re claim 1, Williams et al. show a nozzle (Fig. 5) for injecting a processing liquid (W), the nozzle comprising a cylindrical housing (B) having a central axis, wherein the housing comprises: a liquid supply port (at W) to supply the processing liquid into the housing; a gas supply port (24) to supply a compressed gas into the housing; and an injection port (top of B) to inject the processing liquid together with the compressed gas, wherein the injection port has an annular shape (Fig. 4A, demonstrated as cylindrical) extending around the central axis. Re claim 2, Williams et al. show a rod member (S) disposed between the liquid supply port (at W) and the injection port (top of B) in an extending direction of the central axis, the rod member (S) having an inclined surface (Fig. 5) in which a diameter increases toward the injection port (top of B), wherein a fluid passage (F+W) is formed between an inner peripheral surface of the housing (B) and the inclined surface to guide the processing liquid (W) supplied from the liquid supply port (at W) and the compressed gas (F) supplied from the gas supply port (24) to the injection port (top of B). Re claim 3, Williams et al. show the nozzle is configured to atomize and inject the processing liquid from the injection port (top of B). Re claim 4, Williams et al. show a liquid supply pipe (bottom of B) to guide the processing liquid into the housing (B) along the central axis; and a diffusion plate (Figs. 4C & 5, SS) to diffuse the processing liquid flowing through the liquid supply pipe, the diffusion plate having a plurality of openings (between 18) arranged along a circumferential direction about the central axis. Re claim 5, Williams et al. disclose the processing liquid is an etching liquid (col. 3, line 13) to etch a workpiece. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN MICHAEL CERNOCH whose telephone number is (571)270-3540. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri; 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arthur Hall can be reached at (571)270-1814. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. STEVEN MICHAEL CERNOCH Primary Examiner Art Unit 3752 /STEVEN M CERNOCH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 19, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594909
SPRAY STRUCTURE FOR CLEANING A SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594564
INJECTION NOZZLE AND INJECTION DEVICE INCLUDING INJECTION NOZZLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582998
SERVICEABLE SPRINKLER WITH NUTATING DISTRIBUTION PLATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582857
DEVICE FOR GENERATING A JET OF TWO-PHASE FLUID
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583006
Blow Off Cover for a Nozzle
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+41.0%)
4y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 721 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month